Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Live Blog: Dean Barkley on Political Polarization

Bookmark and Share

12:07 p.m. Dean Barkley, founder of the Independence Party, is giving a speech this afternoon at the Humphrey Institute entitled, "The Polarization of Our Political Parties." Barkley has polled as high as 19 percent during this past week in the U.S. Senate matchup against Republican Norm Coleman and DFL-er Al Franken.

12:10 p.m. Barkley says the polarization of the two major parties started after the end of the Vietnam War. Barkley left the Democratic Party after he felt they lost their way in giving into the special interests. Barkley credits Independent presidential candidate John Anderson's 1980 run with the first attempt to unify the middle into a cohesive political movement.

12:15 p.m. In the 1990s in Minnesota, Barkley says Minnesota had two U.S. Senators that represented the extreme left (Paul Wellstone) and right (Rod Grams). Barkley jokes he could use the same campaign materials he used 16 years ago when he ran for Congress (e.g. gridlock, deficit spending), but that he'd "have to add a few more zeros."

12:22 p.m. Barkley says Norm Coleman left the Democratic Party in the 1990s over a single issue (abortion; Coleman is pro-life).

12:25 p.m. Barkley laments how the Taxpayers League has a hold on the Republican Party, and that the dogmatic pledge not to raise taxes Republicans are forced to take may have contributed to the I-35 bridge collapse, as Governor Jesse Ventura had attempted to secure more infrastructure funding that was shot down by the legislature.

12:27 p.m. Barkley says we have sold our political institutions to the highest bidder, and that bribery is illegal everywhere except in politics.

12:29 p.m. "How much child abuse can we inflict on our kids?," poses Barkley, in reference to the amount of deficit spending the United States is incurring.

12:33 p.m. Barkley says there are some good people in the U.S. Senate who are willing to break away from their caucus - there is a Gang of 20 (10 Democrats and 10 Republicans) - who will do what is right for the country on certain issues and vote agains their party's leadership.

12:36 p.m. When asked how he would deal with fixing Social Security, Barkley says he would bring AARP into the conservation ("start talking with the enemy") and asking them what their solution is, as opposed to having them be against everything. In regards to the national debt, Barkley says neither Coleman nor Franken will even touch the issue.

12:40 p.m. Barkley, although he was against the financial bailout legislation in its first incarnation, ultimately supported the second version, to avert greater financial crisis.

12:45 p.m. In terms of trimming the budget, Barkley says he would first look at the defense budget. He says we have too many bases around the world, and, hopefully, we have reached the point where we will stop being the world's policeman.

12:47 p.m. Barkley says he would consider eliminating the Department of Education. He says he does not want Washington D.C. to have its hand in running education in the State of Minnesota. Barkley says he would support vouchers for private institutions, but not religious institutions, as that "crosses the line" between the separation of church and state.

12:52 p.m. Barkley supports simplification of the tax code, whereby the tax rates drop and loopholes are eliminated.

12:56 p.m. Barkley says we were lied to in getting into the Iraq War, but we had a responsibility to "undo the damage we did." Barkley says we have now done enough to give Iraq a chance at being successful, and we should pull out now - in 6 months, a year, or 14 months, whatever the case may be. If the country devolves into chaos, "that's on them," he adds.

1:02 p.m. Barkley says the War in Iraq is the biggest foreign policy error since Vietnam, and that Congress should never pass another War Powers Act - only Congress should be able to send troops to war.

1:06 p.m. Barkley says he "is a Libertarian at heart," and that the Patriot Act went too far, though not by a lot.

1:09 p.m. With regards to how the rules could be change to benefit third party candidacies, Barkley advocates having uniform rules for achieving major party status across the 50 states. He also supports an instant run-off voting system, which would eliminate the 'wasted vote' argument.

1:13 p.m. Barkley says if New York City mayor Mike Bloomberg would have run for president as an independent he would have won. Barkley says he will not caucus with either party if he is elected to the U.S. Senate.


Previous post: Election Profile: Wisconsin's 4th Congressional District (2008)
Next post: Election Profile: Wisconsin's 5th Congressional District (2008)

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting