Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Coleman Victory Would Be the Greatest GOP Senate Triumph in Minnesota History

Bookmark and Share

Earlier this month Smart Politics examined how a victory by Norm Coleman would mark the first time since 1940 that a Republican has been elected Senator from the Gopher State in a presidential election year in which a Democrat was sent to the White House.

That study examined the Coleman victory against the backdrop of the national political environment. But when examining other measures that capture the political temperature of the 2008 election within the Gopher State, a strong case can be made that a Coleman victory would be the most remarkable GOP U.S. Senate triumph in Minnesota history.

Since popular vote U.S. Senate elections began in Minnesota in 1912, the state has elected 4 Republicans to the Senate whilst also casting its electoral votes for the Democratic presidential nominee. Three of those cases involved incumbent GOP Senators, like Coleman in 2008: Dave Durenberger in 1988 (3rd term), Rudy Boschwitz in 1984 (2nd term), and Henrik Shipstead in 1940 (4th term).

But if Coleman retains his Senate seat, he would have emerged victorious in the face of a much tougher hurdle at the top of the ticket:

· In 2008, Barack Obama carried Minnesota by 10.2 points.
· In 1988, Michael Dukakis won Minnesota by 7.0 points.
· In 1984, Walter Mondale carried Minnesota by 0.2 points.
· In 1940, FDR won Minnesota by 3.8 points.

The only other instance in which a Republican was elected U.S. Senator in a year in which the Gopher State supported a Democratic presidential nominee was 1936. However, in that year (in which FDR carried the Gopher State by 30.8 points), Minnesota had two Senate elections on the ballot. Republican Guy V. Howard won the special election to serve out only the last two months of the term ending January 3, 1937 to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Republican Thomas D. Schall on December 22, 1935. (Farmer-Laborite Ernest Lundeen won the regular election).

In other words, a Coleman victory would mark the first time in Gopher State history that a Republican candidate won a full-term U.S. Senate seat whilst the state cast its electoral votes for a Democrat by double-digits.

There is also a second measure by which a Coleman victory would be historically “odds-defying,? and that is evident by examining the balance of power in the Minnesota House of Representatives.

The 2008 election will give the DFL a 40-seat advantage in the House, 87 to 47 seats. No Republican has been elected Senator in light of such a lopsided state legislative landslide in favor of the DFL since that party’s merger in 1944.

In three previous elections, GOP Senators were elected in the face of DFL majorities down the ballot in legislative House races across the state:

· In 1994, Republican Rod Grams won election while the DFL carried the House by 8 seats, 71 to 63.
· In 1988, Dave Durenberger won a third term as the DFL garnered a 28-seat advantage in the House, 81 to 53.
· In 1982, Durenberger won his second term in the face of a 20-seat DFL advantage statewide, 77 to 57 seats.

In light of this historical evidence, if Norm Coleman emerges victorious from the recount in the face of a double-digit win in Minnesota by Barack Obama and a 40-seat throttling of the GOP in state legislative races, the Senator can probably lay claim to the most impressive Senate victory for a Republican in Gopher State history.

Previous post: MN Senate Recount: Challenges in Franken Territory On the Rise
Next post: Smart Politics to Live Blog Conference on MN Redistricting

2 Comments


  • Eric, your hypothesis is sheer nonsense. If Coleman wins, it will be by the tiniest of margins in a three-way race. Whoever wins, he will have the smallest share of the vote since renegade Thomas Schall was elected in another three-way race in 1930 after beating the establishment Republican candidate in the primary. And Schall went on to become the most hated senator. (Time Magazine, December 30, 1935)

    How this can be a considered a "triumph" for Republicans is unclear. (A bare victory, yes.) It is more plausible that the election gives Coleman another six years to plan his exit. It should be obvious to all that had the DFL run anyone but Franken, he or she would have won handily. That includes Mike Ciresi, Judi Dutcher, Priscilla Lord-Faris ... even what's-his-name the anti-war activist.

    I also have no clue how this can be construed as a greater victory for Republicans than either 1942 or 1978, when they won both senate seats, the latter year with a majority for each and running no incumbents. If Monty offered you both Hubert Humphrey's and Walter Mondale's seats at once with majorities by running electorally inexperienced candidates, would you really take a chance on what was behind door number 2?

  • > I also have no clue how this can be construed as a greater
    > victory for Republicans than either 1942 or 1978, when
    > they won both senate seats, the latter year with a majority
    > for each and running no incumbents.

    It is quite simple why 2008 is more noteworthy - especially compared to your 1978 example.

    In 1978 there was a Republican wave in the Gopher State. The GOP picked up a net 37 seats in the MN House of Representatives, from 30 to 67 seats. Republicans also took back the governorship with Al Quie. During this 'wave election' it should not be surprising at all that the Republicans would win these Senate seats. In 2008 there were none of those variables in the GOP's favor nationally or statewide.

    You are also misrepresenting the 1942 election - the Republicans did not win two full-term Senate seats that November. One race was a special election for the unexpired term ending January 3, 1943 to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Farmer-Laborite Ernest Lundeen on August 31, 1940. The vacancy had been filled until the special election by the appointment of Republican Joseph H. Ball on October 14, 1940. Ball won the full-term election and Arthur E. Nelson got to serve for the remaining two months of Lundeen's seat. In other words, Republican continuity was simply maintained from Ball to Nelson back to Ball.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    No Free Passes: States With 2 Major Party Candidates in Every US House Race

    Indiana has now placed candidates from both major parties on the ballot in a nation-best 189 consecutive U.S. House races, with New Hampshire, Minnesota, Idaho, and Montana also north of 100 in a row.

    Political Crumbs

    Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

    Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


    An Idaho Six Pack

    Two-term Idaho Republican Governor Butch Otter only polled at 39 percent in a recent PPP survey of the state's 2014 race - just four points ahead of Democratic businessman A.J. Balukoff. Otter's low numbers reflect his own struggles as a candidate (witness his weak primary win against State Senator Russ Fulcher) combined with the opportunity for disgruntled Idahoans to cast their votes for one of four third party and independent candidates, who collectively received the support of 12 percent of likely voters: Libertarian John Bujak, the Constitution Party's Steve Pankey, and independents Jill Humble and Pro-Life (aka Marvin Richardson). The six candidate options in a gubernatorial race sets an all-time record in the Gem State across the 46 elections conducted since statehood. The previous high water mark of five candidates was reached in seven previous cycles: 1902, 1904, 1908, 1912, 1914, 1966, and 2010.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting