Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Inside Obama's Landslide: The Young Man Went West

Bookmark and Share

Barack Obama’s near landslide victory over John McCain last week was impressive on a number of dimensions. Most obviously, Obama picked up 9 states that went Republican in the 2004 election: Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, North Carolina, New Mexico, Nevada, Ohio, and Virginia.

Less evident, but equally impressive, is that Obama improved on John Kerry’s margin of victory (or defeat) in 46 of the 50 states plus the District of Columbia. The five states in which Obama lost ground for the Democrats from 2004 are Arkansas (-9.78 points), Louisiana (-4.19), Tennessee (-0.90), West Virginia (-0.24), and Oklahoma (-0.15).

Interestingly, Hillary Clinton carried 4 of those 5 states during the Democratic primary, as well as 7 of the 9 states in which Obama had the least impressive movement from the 2004 election: Arkansas, Tennessee, West Virginia, Oklahoma, Massachusetts (+0.54), Arizona (+1.87), and Kentucky (+3.63) (Obama won Louisiana and Alaska (+0.43)). While Obama was never expected to carry any of those states in the general election, save Massachusetts, it is possible that the selection of Sarah Palin, despite the beating she took in the national press, solidified support for McCain (or opposition to Obama) among Hillary Clinton voters in some of those states.

Still, Obama registered double-digit improvements over John Kerry’s margin of victory or loss in 24 states in 2008 – including 14 states that were won by George W. Bush in 2004: Indiana (+21.64), North Dakota (+18.68), Montana (+18.01), Nebraska (+17.18), Utah (+16.82), New Mexico (+15.39), Nevada (+15.01), Virginia (+14.35), South Dakota (+13.06), North Carolina (+12.75), Idaho (+12.64), Colorado (+11.42), Georgia (+11.34), and Texas (+11.11).

As the preceding data suggests, Obama’s 50-state strategy paid off much more in the West, where his average gain from 2004 was 11.3 points (excluding Hawaii), compared to just 4.1 points in the South – despite picking up Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida for the Democrats.

Democratic Presidential Nominee Margin of Victory / Loss By State, 2004-2008

State
2004
2008
Difference
Arkansas
-9.76
-19.54
-9.78
Louisiana
-14.51
-18.70
-4.19
Tennessee
-14.27
-15.17
-0.90
West Virginia
-12.86
-13.10
-0.24
Oklahoma
-31.14
-31.29
-0.15
Alaska
-25.55
-25.12
0.43
Massachusetts
25.16
25.70
0.54
Arizona
-10.47
-8.60
1.87
Kentucky
-19.86
-16.23
3.63
Alabama
-25.62
-21.62
4.00
Ohio
-2.11
3.79
5.90
Mississippi
-19.69
-13.74
5.95
D.C.
79.84
85.95
6.11
Minnesota
3.48
10.24
6.76
Missouri
-7.20
-0.20
7.00
New York
18.29
25.44
7.15
Rhode Island
20.75
27.91
7.16
Wyoming
-39.79
-32.24
7.55
New Jersey
6.68
14.42
7.74
Pennsylvania
2.50
10.25
7.75
Florida
-5.01
2.80
7.81
South Carolina
-17.08
-8.98
8.10
Maine
9.00
17.53
8.53
New Hampshire
1.37
10.40
9.03
Washington
7.18
16.56
9.38
Iowa
-0.67
9.27
9.94
Kansas
-25.38
-15.39
9.99
Maryland
12.98
23.82
10.84
Texas
-22.86
-11.75
11.11
Georgia
-16.60
-5.26
11.34
Colorado
-4.67
6.75
11.42
Oregon
4.16
16.06
11.90
Connecticut
10.37
22.60
12.23
Idaho
-38.12
-25.48
12.64
North Carolina
-12.43
0.32
12.75
Michigan
3.42
16.46
13.04
South Dakota
-21.47
-8.41
13.06
Wisconsin
0.38
13.90
13.52
California
9.95
23.57
13.62
Illinois
10.34
24.67
14.33
Virginia
-8.20
6.15
14.35
Nevada
-2.59
12.42
15.01
New Mexico
-0.79
14.60
15.39
Vermont
20.14
35.65
15.51
Utah
-45.54
-28.72
16.82
Nebraska
-33.22
-16.04
17.18
Delaware
7.59
24.99
17.40
Montana
-20.50
-2.49
18.01
North Dakota
-27.36
-8.68
18.68
Indiana
-20.68
0.96
21.64
Hawaii
8.74
45.27
36.53

Previous post: How Will the National Media Cover the Franken vs. Coleman Recount?
Next post: Will Pawlenty Run For A Third Term?

1 Comment


  • Arkansas
    -9.76

    -19.54

    -9.78
    Louisiana
    -14.51

    -18.70

    -4.19

    that s true

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting