Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Smart Politics On WCCO-TV's "Good Question": Obama and His Blackberry

Bookmark and Share

Smart Politics' Eric Ostermeier was interviewed by the always-affable Jason DeRusha for his "Good Question" segment on WCCO-TV Tuesday evening.

The "Good Question" at issue was, "Why Can't the President Use E-Mail" - in light of Barack Obama's recent announcement that he would be giving up his Blackberry when he became president.

Obama's decision not to communicate as president via e-mail - whether for reasons of security (e.g. Sarah Palin's public relations disaster after her personal Yahoo account was hacked) or to further shield his presidency from potential future Congressional investigations - is the first sobering news, albeit trivial, for supporters who believe Obama will be an agent of great change in the White House (past presidents have also given up e-mail upon taking office, although they are not required to do so).

Obama will not, as it turns out, be the first e-mailing president - an interesting juxtaposition against the image of his presidential campaign which masterfully used e-mails and texting to mobilize thousands of volunteers, millions of voters, and raise hundreds of millions of dollars.

But, for those who are dismayed that Obama will not be the first 'digital President,' fear not: Election 2012 is just around the corner and the "Re-elect Obama" campaign will be more than happy to flood your inbox and cell phones with e-mails and text messages in just a few years.

Previous post: MN Senate Election Analysis, Part 2: Norm Coleman’s Metro Slide
Next post: Coleman Victory Would Renew Minnesota Tradition of Split-Ticket Voting

1 Comment


  • I can not belive he will have to give up the Blackberry.

    Blackberry's are one of the most secure devices out there im sure he will be lost without it.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Kevin McCarthy Becomes Least Tenured Floor Leader in US House History

    At less than four terms, McCarthy has served 423 fewer days in the chamber than any floor leader in U.S. House history and almost 10 years less than the average leader.

    Political Crumbs

    The Second Time Around

    Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


    How Are the Plurality Winners Doing?

    Nearly 40 percent of plurality winners of U.S. Senate elections lose their seat in the next election cycle. Will that happen to any of the three such incumbents on the ballot in 2014? Recent polling suggests Democrats Al Franken of Minnesota, Mark Begich of Alaska, and Jeff Merkley of Oregon all currently have an advantage over their nominated/frontrunning GOP opponents, but each is flirting with plurality support once again. Franken led endorsed GOPer Mike McFadden 48 to 42 percent in a new SurveyUSA poll while the polling group showed Merkley with a 50 to 32 percent advantage over Monica Wehby. Begich led each of the three major GOP candidates in last month's PPP survey: 42 to 37 percent over Daniel Sullivan, 41 to 33 percent over Mead Treadwell, and 43 to 27 percent over Joe Miller.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting