Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Crime and the Minnesota Economy Revisited: Brace for Property Crime Surge

Bookmark and Share

At about the same time Smart Politics posited the question as to what effect, if any, the rising unemployment rate and economic downturn would have on the state’s violent crime rate, Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak’s office issued a press release documenting how violent crime has declined in every Minneapolis precinct since 2007, has dropped 13 percent citywide thus far in 2008, and is down 24 percent compared to 2006.

In the release, the Mayor suggested, however, that the economic woes and budget deficit currently faced by Minnesota might be a predecessor for this trend to backtrack, and for violent crime to rise again:

“While we are pleased with this continued progress, we know that, with the current economy and state budget deficit, tougher times are around the corner. We need to keep our eye on the ball and keep public safety as our central focus.? (Minneapolis Crime Falls for 2nd Year in a Row, 12/22/08)

While historical data statewide (documented by Smart Politics earlier in the week) does not indicate there to be a positive association between economic indicators and violent crime, the same cannot be said for property crimes (burglary, larceny/theft, and vehicle theft).

Smart Politics conducted a bivariate correlation of trends in Minnesota’s gross domestic product and the property crime rate and found, not surprisingly, these variables are negatively related (-.837, significant at the .01 level). In other words, greater increases in gross domestic product are associated with greater decreases in the property crime rate in statewide. The “near zero growth rate? in the Minnesota economy projected by Pawlenty’s finance team would thus suggest a surge in property crimes is also on the horizon.

Smart Politics also conducted a linear regression analysis, using Minnesota’s yearly Gross Domestic Product as the independent variable and yearly property crime rate as the dependent variable. The results, using yearly data going back to 1976, show an increase of one million dollars in gross domestic product causes a drop in the property crime rate of .006 incidents per 100,000 people. Seventy percent (R Square = .700) of the variation in property crime in this model is explained by changes in GDP. The model as a whole is highly significant (at the .001 level).

Now, a drop of just .006 property crime incidents per 100,000 people does not sound like a large drop at all, until one examines the scope of Minnesota’s GDP. At over $250 billion dollars per year, the Gopher State’s GDP would make it the 28th largest in the world if it were a country (about the size of Norway’s GDP).

For example, from 2006 to 2007, the state GDP increased by 12.875 billion dollars. That means since an increase of GDP of one million dollars causes a .006 incident drop in the property crime rate, a 12.876 billion dollar increase would cause a drop of 77 property crime incidents per 100,000 people. This is not a trivial amount, as the average increase or decline in property crimes during this 30+-year period was just 166 incidents per 100,000 people.

There are, of course, many more factors than simply the state of the economy and GDP that contribute to the rise (and fall) of property crime rates. But, in general, an amended version of Mayor Rybak’s comments that a surge in property crime rates could befall the city during the current economic crisis is right on target.

Minnesota Property Crime and GDP, 1976-2007

Year
Property Crime rate
Gross Domestic Product
2007
3,036.6
254,970
2006
3,079.5
242,095
2005
3,087.8
232,001
2004
3,041.6
223,454
2003
3,113.3
208,179
2002
3,264.3
198,558
2001
3,311.2
190,231
2000
3,207.6
185,093
1999
3,323.6
172,874
1998
3,736.3
164,897
1997
4,076.1
155,938
1996
4,124.3
141,664
1995
4,141.2
131,357
1994
3,982.0
124,733
1993
4,059.0
114,946
1992
4,252.7
111,919
1991
4,180.2
103,791
1990
4,232.7
100,327
1989
4,094.9
96,165
1988
4,024.7
89,991
1987
4,330.4
83,947
1986
4,077.6
78,194
1985
3,877.8
74,808
1984
3,630.0
70,296
1983
3,843.3
61,029
1982
4,235.4
56,952
1981
4,508.2
54,966
1980
4,571.7
49,717
1979
4,171.8
46,353
1978
3,954.5
41,126
1977
4,037.0
36,380
1976
4,142.1
32,610

Minnesota Property Crime Index: rates Per 100,000 inhabitants (Source: FBI Uniform Crime Reports).
Minnesota Gross Domestic Product: in millions of current dollars, all industries total (Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce)



Previous post: Getting to 15 Percent: Two Different Paths for Dean Barkley (’08) and Tim Penny (’02)
Next post: Hutchinson (’06) Performance Strong Predictor of Barkley Countywide Support in Minnesota Senate Race

1 Comment


  • Indeed the the rising unemployment rate and economic downturn are preoccupying. It will be interesting to see if they will have any impact on the violent crime rate.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting