Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Hutchinson (’06) Performance Strong Predictor of Barkley Countywide Support in Minnesota Senate Race

Bookmark and Share

As documented by Smart Politics last week, Independence Party candidate Dean Barkley took a very different path to reach 15 percent in the 2008 Minnesota U.S. Senate race than did 2002 Independence Party gubernatorial nominee, Tim Penny (who reached 16 percent in that race).

Penny’s support was heavily skewed towards his old 1st Congressional District stomping ground, but generally performed fairly weak elsewhere. Barkley, unlike Penny, failed to finish second place in even a single county (Penny won 7 and placed second in 8 more), but his support was more evenly distributed throughout the state.

The Penny campaign was thus not a good template to project how Barkley’s support was to be allocated from county to county across Minnesota in the 2008 Senate election. However, the campaign of 2006 Independence Party gubernatorial nominee Peter Hutchinson, did provide such a blueprint.

Hutchinson, who finished a distant third in the 2006 race, ended up with just 6.4 percent of the vote, without reaching double-digits in any county. However, a Smart Politics analysis found countywide votes for Hutchinson and Barkley to be positively correlated (.573, significant a the .01 level). In sum, higher percentages of support for Hutchinson in 2006 are associated with higher percentages of support for Barkley in 2008. (And lower percentages with lower percentages).

But we can glean more from Hutchinson’s performance in 2006. Smart Politics conducted a linear regression analysis with 2006 gubernatorial countywide vote percentages for Hutchinson as the independent variable and 2008 senatorial countywide vote percentages for Barkley as the dependent variable. The model finds that 30 percent of the variation (R Square = .295) in the vote for Barkley is explained by the 2006 Hutchinson vote, with every 1 percent earned in a county by Hutchinson begetting a 1.6 percent vote in 2008 for Barkley (the model is very significant, at the .001 level).

In other words, putting aside all other reasons for vote choice (candidate travel to counties, candidate resource availability, candidate campaign advertising, candidate personality traits, candidate name recognition etc.), and just looking at the Independence Party gubernatorial vote in 2006, we have a very strong predictor to estimate the county-to-county distribution of Barkley’s countywide vote in 2008.

For example, consider the performances of Hutchinson and Barkley in Pipestone (3 and 9 percent respectively), Rouseau (3 and 10 percent), and Houston (4 and 9 percent) counties. All three counties were among the four worst for each candidate across the state.

On the flip side, three of top four counties with Hutchinson’s best performances (Waseca, 9 percent; Renville, 8 percent; Meeker, 8 percent) were three of the top four counties for Barkley as well (Waseca, 23 percent; Renville, 23 percent; Meeker 22 percent).

Barkley’s much stronger performance than Hutchinson was no doubt in some part attributed to the greater name recognition and favorability rating he enjoyed. For example, the (final) October 28th Rasmussen poll of 500 likely voters found only 15 percent of Minnesotans had no opinion of Barkley, with 53 percent having a favorable view of the IP nominee. By contrast, a November 1, 2006 Rasmussen poll found 25 percent of Minnesotans had no opinion of Peter Hutchinson, with just 41 percent viewing him favorably.

Barkley also likely benefited by some measure due to the fact that Norm Coleman and Al Franken collectively had a higher unfavorability rating (48 and 51 percent respectively, according to the late October 2008 Rasmussen poll) than compared to Tim Pawlenty and Mike Hatch (47 and 45 percent respectively, according to the November 2006 Rasmussen survey). Barkley became an attractive third choice to a slightly larger pool of voters who didn't like either the DFL or GOP nominee.

Countywide Vote for Penny ('02), Hutchinson (’06), and Barkley (’08)

County
Penny
Hutchinson
Barkley
Aitkin
17
7
19
Anoka
14
6
17
Becker
11
4
13
Beltrami
8
4
10
Benton
16
5
21
Big Stone
12
5
16
Blue Earth
33
6
18
Brown
23
7
20
Carlton
11
5
14
Carver
14
6
16
Cass
15
5
15
Chippewa
19
5
20
Chisago
13
6
18
Clay
8
4
12
Clearwater
8
5
11
Cook
16
8
14
Cottonwood
18
5
17
Crow Wing
15
5
16
Dakota
13
6
15
Dodge
42
6
18
Douglas
14
6
18
Faribault
48
7
19
Fillmore
48
5
14
Freeborn
52
5
17
Goodhue
30
7
20
Grant
13
6
18
Hennepin
14
8
13
Houston
36
4
9
Hubbard
11
5
15
Isanti
12
6
18
Itasca
12
5
13
Jackson
20
5
17
Kanabec
13
6
19
Kandiyohi
14
6
16
Kittson
8
4
11
Koochiching
13
5
11
Lac Qui Parle
16
5
19
Lake
12
6
13
Lake of the Woods
12
4
11
Le Sueur
32
6
22
Lincoln
14
5
11
Lyon
15
5
16
Mahnomen
10
4
13
Marshall
8
4
13
Martin
26
5
18
McLeod
17
7
22
Meeker
17
8
22
Mille Lacs
15
5
20
Morrison
14
5
20
Mower
43
5
15
Murray
16
3
12
Nicollet
29
7
18
Nobles
15
4
10
Norman
8
4
13
Olmsted
39
5
14
Otter Trail
11
4
13
Pennington
9
5
12
Pine
14
5
17
Pipestone
16
3
8
Polk
7
4
11
Pope
15
6
18
Ramsey
12
9
13
Red Lake
9
4
14
Redwood
18
7
20
Renville
18
8
23
Rice
24
7
17
Rock
10
5
9
Roseau
6
3
10
Scott
15
6
17
Sherburne
13
5
18
Sibley
23
7
26
St. Louis
11
5
12
Stearns
15
5
19
Steele
41
6
21
Stevens
13
4
14
Swift
13
6
19
Todd
14
5
19
Traverse
13
4
19
Wabasha
37
5
20
Wadena
11
5
15
Waseca
59
9
23
Washington
12
8
15
Watonwan
29
6
20
Wilkin
9
5
13
Winona
31
6
10
Wright
14
5
20
Yellow Medicine
15
6
19



Previous post: Crime and the Minnesota Economy Revisited: Brace for Property Crime Surge
Next post: Minnesota '08 U.S. House Contests More Competitive Than National Average by Double-Digits

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting