Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Minnesota '08 U.S. House Contests More Competitive Than National Average by Double-Digits

Bookmark and Share

As Minnesota gears up for congressional and legislative redistricting in the next few years, as well as the possible loss of a U.S. House seat, the Gopher State can take some pride in the fact that its U.S. House contests continue to be more competitive than the national average by double-digit margins – for four consecutive election cycles since the current redistricting map took effect in 2002, according to an analysis by Smart Politics.

In 2008, the average margin of victory in Minnesota’s eight U.S. House races was 27.6 points, 10.6 points lower than the 38.2-point average across all 435 contests nationwide. Since redistricting in 2002, the average margin of victory in Minnesota has been fairly steady in its elections to the U.S. House: 30.2 points in 2002, 26.6 points in 2004, and 25.4 points in 2006.

The state's 10.6-point competitiveness advantage in 2008, however, is the lowest for Minnesota since the new Congressional district lines were drawn. In 2002 the Gopher State was 12.4 points more competitive than the nation as a whole, followed by 14.1 points in 2004, and 10.9 points in 2006.

Minnesota has also boasted a greater number of highly competitive seats than the U.S. overall. Since 2002, 5 of Minnesota’s 32 U.S. House races, or 15.6 percent, have been decided by less than 10 points: Districts 3 and 6 in 2008, Districts 1 and 6 in 2006, and District 6 in 2004. Nationwide, just 9.3 percent of general election House races since 2002 have been decided by single-digits (161 of 1,740).

The Gopher State does not score the best marks in the region, however, when it comes to fielding competitive congressional races – not by a long shot. Iowa, home to five congressional districts, has seen an average margin of victory in the last four election cycles of just 15.9 points, compared to 27.5 points for Minnesota. In 2008, the average margin of victory in the Hawkeye State was 20.9 points – nearly 7 points more competitive than Minnesota. This past election was actually the least competitive in Iowa since redistricting: in 2002 the average margin of victory was 13.1 points, followed by 18.1 points in 2004, and 11.5 points in 2006. Overall, Iowa’s congressional races have been 23.6 points more competitive than the nation as a whole, with 20 percent of its contests decided by less than 10 points (4 of 20).

Minnesota has been much more competitive than its neighbor to the east. The state of Wisconsin actually has a poorer track record than the nation as a whole in terms of fielding competitive U.S. House races. Since 2002, the average margin of victory in the Badger State has been 41.4 points, which is 1.9 points higher than the national average: 52.6 points in 2002, 37.7 points in 2004, 34.8 points in 2006, and 40.3 points in 2008. Only 2 of Wisconsin’s 32 contests since 2002 (6.3 percent) have been decided by less than 10 points (the 8th CD in both 2006 and 2008). Moreover, Wisconsin has failed to place both a Democrat and a Republican on the ballot in nearly one-quarter of its contests during this span (7 of 32, 22 percent). Minnesota and Iowa have consistently fielded candidates from both major political parties.

Upper Midwestern Competitiveness in U.S. House Elections, 2002-2008 (Margin of Victory)

Year
U.S.
Minnesota
Iowa
Wisconsin
2008
38.2
27.6 (-10.6)
20.9 (-17.3)
40.3 (+2.1)
2006
36.3
25.4 (-10.9)
11.5 (-24.8)
34.8 (-1.5)
2004
40.7
26.6 (-14.1)
18.1 (-22.6)
37.7 (-3.0)
2002
42.6
30.2 (-12.4)
13.1 (-29.5)
52.6 (+10.0)
Average
39.5
27.5 (-12.0)
15.9 (-23.6)
41.4 (+1.9)



Previous post: Hutchinson (’06) Performance Strong Predictor of Barkley Countywide Support in Minnesota Senate Race
Next post: Minnesota's Currently Drawn Congressional Maps 3rd Least Competitive in State History

1 Comment


  • In the Year 2008, the average is increasing and back to its normal rating...Thanks for this opportunity to let us know this thing:)

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Plurality-Winning Governors Elected At Century-Long High Water Mark

    The rate of gubernatorial candidates elected without the support of a majority of voters is at its highest level since the 1910s.

    Political Crumbs

    Seeing Red

    Congressman Nick Rahall's failed bid for a 20th term in West Virginia this cycle, combined with a narrow loss by Nick Casey to Alex Mooney in Shelley Moore Capito's open seat, means that West Virginia Democrats will be shut out of the state's U.S. House delegation for the first time in over 90 years. The Republican sweep by two-term incumbent David McKinley in the 1st CD, Mooney in the 2nd, and Evan Jenkins over Rahall in the 3rd marks the first time the GOP has held all seats in the chamber from West Virginia since the Election of 1920. During the 67th Congress (1921-1923) all six seats from the state were controlled by the GOP. Since the Election of 1922, Democrats have won 76 percent of all U.S. House elections in the Mountain State - capturing 172 seats compared to 54 for the GOP.


    Home Field Advantage?

    When the 114th Congress convenes in a few days, Maine will be represented by one home-grown U.S. Representative: Waterville-born Republican Bruce Poliquin. With the departure of Millinocket-born Mike Michaud, who launched a failed gubernatorial bid, the Pine Tree State was poised to send a House delegation to D.C. without any Maine-born members for the first time since 1821. Three-term U.S. Rep. Chellie Pingree (born in Minnesota) coasted to reelection as expected, however Poliquin edged Kentucky-born Emily Cain by 5.3 points to keep the streak alive. Since 1876, a total of 208 of the 222 candidates elected to the nation's lower legislative chamber from the state have been born in Maine, or 94 percent.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting