Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Minnesota '08 U.S. House Contests More Competitive Than National Average by Double-Digits

Bookmark and Share

As Minnesota gears up for congressional and legislative redistricting in the next few years, as well as the possible loss of a U.S. House seat, the Gopher State can take some pride in the fact that its U.S. House contests continue to be more competitive than the national average by double-digit margins – for four consecutive election cycles since the current redistricting map took effect in 2002, according to an analysis by Smart Politics.

In 2008, the average margin of victory in Minnesota’s eight U.S. House races was 27.6 points, 10.6 points lower than the 38.2-point average across all 435 contests nationwide. Since redistricting in 2002, the average margin of victory in Minnesota has been fairly steady in its elections to the U.S. House: 30.2 points in 2002, 26.6 points in 2004, and 25.4 points in 2006.

The state's 10.6-point competitiveness advantage in 2008, however, is the lowest for Minnesota since the new Congressional district lines were drawn. In 2002 the Gopher State was 12.4 points more competitive than the nation as a whole, followed by 14.1 points in 2004, and 10.9 points in 2006.

Minnesota has also boasted a greater number of highly competitive seats than the U.S. overall. Since 2002, 5 of Minnesota’s 32 U.S. House races, or 15.6 percent, have been decided by less than 10 points: Districts 3 and 6 in 2008, Districts 1 and 6 in 2006, and District 6 in 2004. Nationwide, just 9.3 percent of general election House races since 2002 have been decided by single-digits (161 of 1,740).

The Gopher State does not score the best marks in the region, however, when it comes to fielding competitive congressional races – not by a long shot. Iowa, home to five congressional districts, has seen an average margin of victory in the last four election cycles of just 15.9 points, compared to 27.5 points for Minnesota. In 2008, the average margin of victory in the Hawkeye State was 20.9 points – nearly 7 points more competitive than Minnesota. This past election was actually the least competitive in Iowa since redistricting: in 2002 the average margin of victory was 13.1 points, followed by 18.1 points in 2004, and 11.5 points in 2006. Overall, Iowa’s congressional races have been 23.6 points more competitive than the nation as a whole, with 20 percent of its contests decided by less than 10 points (4 of 20).

Minnesota has been much more competitive than its neighbor to the east. The state of Wisconsin actually has a poorer track record than the nation as a whole in terms of fielding competitive U.S. House races. Since 2002, the average margin of victory in the Badger State has been 41.4 points, which is 1.9 points higher than the national average: 52.6 points in 2002, 37.7 points in 2004, 34.8 points in 2006, and 40.3 points in 2008. Only 2 of Wisconsin’s 32 contests since 2002 (6.3 percent) have been decided by less than 10 points (the 8th CD in both 2006 and 2008). Moreover, Wisconsin has failed to place both a Democrat and a Republican on the ballot in nearly one-quarter of its contests during this span (7 of 32, 22 percent). Minnesota and Iowa have consistently fielded candidates from both major political parties.

Upper Midwestern Competitiveness in U.S. House Elections, 2002-2008 (Margin of Victory)

Year
U.S.
Minnesota
Iowa
Wisconsin
2008
38.2
27.6 (-10.6)
20.9 (-17.3)
40.3 (+2.1)
2006
36.3
25.4 (-10.9)
11.5 (-24.8)
34.8 (-1.5)
2004
40.7
26.6 (-14.1)
18.1 (-22.6)
37.7 (-3.0)
2002
42.6
30.2 (-12.4)
13.1 (-29.5)
52.6 (+10.0)
Average
39.5
27.5 (-12.0)
15.9 (-23.6)
41.4 (+1.9)



Previous post: Hutchinson (’06) Performance Strong Predictor of Barkley Countywide Support in Minnesota Senate Race
Next post: Minnesota's Currently Drawn Congressional Maps 3rd Least Competitive in State History

1 Comment


  • In the Year 2008, the average is increasing and back to its normal rating...Thanks for this opportunity to let us know this thing:)

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting