Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Minnesota's Currently Drawn Congressional Maps 3rd Least Competitive in State History

Bookmark and Share

Despite Smart Politics’ recent observation that Minnesota’s U.S. House elections are far more competitive than the national average, new research by Smart Politics finds the Gopher State’s current district boundaries to have produced the 3rd lowest number of competitive races out of the 15 Congressional maps that have been drawn since statehood.

In the four general elections that have been held under the current incarnation of the Congressional district maps, there have been just 5 competitive races out of 32 contests, or those decided by less than 10 points (15.6 percent). Now, while that is much higher than the national average (9.3 percent), it is very poor when judged against the state's electoral history.

Only the 1972-1980 redistricting plan (5 competitive races, 12.5 percent) and the 1912-1920 map (7 competitive races, 14.0 percent) yielded more blowout victories than Minnesota's currently drawn Congressional districts.

Will a potential reapportionment in 2012 that reduces the number of districts from eight to seven create more competitiveness in Minnesota the long-term? Probably not, according to historical data.

It is true that when Minnesota had just a handful of seats in the U.S. House in the 1800s, the frequency of competitive races was much higher (and the average margin of victory, much lower):

· From 1882-1890, when the state had 5 seats, 56 percent of the contests held that decade were decided by less than 10 points (14 of 25 races). The average margin of victory was just 16.7 points.

· From 1872-1880, when Minnesota had 3 seats, 40 percent of U.S. House elections were competitive (6 of 15 races). The average margin of victory was only 13.9 points during this period.

· From 1892-1900, when the Gopher State had 7 seats, 37.1 percent of Congressional elections were decided by less than 10 points (13 of 35 races). The average margin of victory was 14.3 points during this 5-election cycle.

However, when Minnesota sent 9 members to the House of Representatives in D.C for three straight cycles from the 1930s through the 1950s, more than twice as many contests were competitively decided, 31.7 percent (40 of 126 races), as the current district scheme. (Note: data excludes the 1932 election in which 9 at-large representatives were elected). As such, fewer districts in the state will not beget more competitive races; more competitively-drawn maps is a start.

Not surprisingly, in addition to the current Congressional maps having yielded such a feeble number of competitive races, the margin of victory during the last four elections (27.5 points) is also one of the highest in state history (5th out of 15; although Minnesota is more competitive than the national average by 10+ points). Only the 1902-1910 map (38.7 points), the 1912-1920 map (32.8 points), the 1972-1980 map (32.1 points), and the 1982-1990 map (31.2 points) have created more lopsided election results.

The fact that 3 of the 5 least competitive rounds of Minnesota Congressional elections in state history have occurred during the last 4 district maps should serve notice to the Minnesota State Legislature and the Governor that more work needs to be done, and a bold redistricting process introduced, to help insure more competitive elections in the state.

Competitiveness in Minnesota U.S. House Elections Since Statehood by Congressional District Map

Period
Seats
Competitive races
Percent competitive
MoV
2002-2008
8
5
15.6
27.5
1992-2000
8
10
25.0
23.4
1982-1990
8
7
17.5
31.2
1972-1980
8
5
12.5
32.1
1962-1970
8
11
27.5
22.4
1952-1960
9
13
28.9
18.4
1942-1950
9
12
26.7
21.6
1932-1940*
9
15
41.7
14.8
1922-1930
10
10
20.0
26.0
1912-1920
10
7
14.0
32.8
1902-1910
9
8
17.8
38.7
1892-1900
7
13
37.1
14.3
1882-1890
5
14
56.0
16.7
1872-1880
3
6
40.0
13.9
1862-1870
2
2
20.0
16.9
1857-1860**
2
NA
NA
NA

* In 1932 Minnesota elected all nine representatives to the U.S. House as at-large representatives.

** From 1857 through 1860, two at-large representatives were elected.



Previous post: Minnesota '08 U.S. House Contests More Competitive Than National Average by Double-Digits
Next post: Franken Has Big Edge in County Distribution of Absentee Ballots

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting