Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Minnesota's Currently Drawn Congressional Maps 3rd Least Competitive in State History

Bookmark and Share

Despite Smart Politics’ recent observation that Minnesota’s U.S. House elections are far more competitive than the national average, new research by Smart Politics finds the Gopher State’s current district boundaries to have produced the 3rd lowest number of competitive races out of the 15 Congressional maps that have been drawn since statehood.

In the four general elections that have been held under the current incarnation of the Congressional district maps, there have been just 5 competitive races out of 32 contests, or those decided by less than 10 points (15.6 percent). Now, while that is much higher than the national average (9.3 percent), it is very poor when judged against the state's electoral history.

Only the 1972-1980 redistricting plan (5 competitive races, 12.5 percent) and the 1912-1920 map (7 competitive races, 14.0 percent) yielded more blowout victories than Minnesota's currently drawn Congressional districts.

Will a potential reapportionment in 2012 that reduces the number of districts from eight to seven create more competitiveness in Minnesota the long-term? Probably not, according to historical data.

It is true that when Minnesota had just a handful of seats in the U.S. House in the 1800s, the frequency of competitive races was much higher (and the average margin of victory, much lower):

· From 1882-1890, when the state had 5 seats, 56 percent of the contests held that decade were decided by less than 10 points (14 of 25 races). The average margin of victory was just 16.7 points.

· From 1872-1880, when Minnesota had 3 seats, 40 percent of U.S. House elections were competitive (6 of 15 races). The average margin of victory was only 13.9 points during this period.

· From 1892-1900, when the Gopher State had 7 seats, 37.1 percent of Congressional elections were decided by less than 10 points (13 of 35 races). The average margin of victory was 14.3 points during this 5-election cycle.

However, when Minnesota sent 9 members to the House of Representatives in D.C for three straight cycles from the 1930s through the 1950s, more than twice as many contests were competitively decided, 31.7 percent (40 of 126 races), as the current district scheme. (Note: data excludes the 1932 election in which 9 at-large representatives were elected). As such, fewer districts in the state will not beget more competitive races; more competitively-drawn maps is a start.

Not surprisingly, in addition to the current Congressional maps having yielded such a feeble number of competitive races, the margin of victory during the last four elections (27.5 points) is also one of the highest in state history (5th out of 15; although Minnesota is more competitive than the national average by 10+ points). Only the 1902-1910 map (38.7 points), the 1912-1920 map (32.8 points), the 1972-1980 map (32.1 points), and the 1982-1990 map (31.2 points) have created more lopsided election results.

The fact that 3 of the 5 least competitive rounds of Minnesota Congressional elections in state history have occurred during the last 4 district maps should serve notice to the Minnesota State Legislature and the Governor that more work needs to be done, and a bold redistricting process introduced, to help insure more competitive elections in the state.

Competitiveness in Minnesota U.S. House Elections Since Statehood by Congressional District Map

Period
Seats
Competitive races
Percent competitive
MoV
2002-2008
8
5
15.6
27.5
1992-2000
8
10
25.0
23.4
1982-1990
8
7
17.5
31.2
1972-1980
8
5
12.5
32.1
1962-1970
8
11
27.5
22.4
1952-1960
9
13
28.9
18.4
1942-1950
9
12
26.7
21.6
1932-1940*
9
15
41.7
14.8
1922-1930
10
10
20.0
26.0
1912-1920
10
7
14.0
32.8
1902-1910
9
8
17.8
38.7
1892-1900
7
13
37.1
14.3
1882-1890
5
14
56.0
16.7
1872-1880
3
6
40.0
13.9
1862-1870
2
2
20.0
16.9
1857-1860**
2
NA
NA
NA

* In 1932 Minnesota elected all nine representatives to the U.S. House as at-large representatives.

** From 1857 through 1860, two at-large representatives were elected.



Previous post: Minnesota '08 U.S. House Contests More Competitive Than National Average by Double-Digits
Next post: Franken Has Big Edge in County Distribution of Absentee Ballots

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Which States Have the Longest and Shortest Election Day Voting Hours?

Residents in some North Dakota towns have less than half as many hours to cast their ballots as those in New York State.

Political Crumbs

No 100-Year Curse for Roberts

Defeating his Tea Party primary challenger Milton Wolf with just 48.1 percent of the vote, Pat Roberts narrowly escaped becoming the first elected U.S. Senator from Kansas to lose a renomination bid in 100 years. The last - and so far only - elected U.S. Senator to lose a Kansas primary was one-term Republican Joseph Bristow in 1914. Bristow was defeated by former U.S. Senator Charles Curtis who went on to win three terms before becoming Herbert Hoover's running mate in 1928. Only one other U.S. Senator from the Sunflower State has lost a primary since the passage of the 17th Amendment: Sheila Frahm in 1996. Frahm was appointed to fill Bob Dole's seat earlier that year and finished 13.2 points behind Sam Brownback in the three-candidate primary field. Overall, incumbent senators from Kansas have won 29 times against two defeats in the direct vote era. (Curtis also lost a primary in 1912 to Walter Stubbs, one year before the nation moved to direct elections).


The Second Time Around

Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting