Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Pawlenty vs. the DFL: The Battle Lines Are (Gently) Drawn

Bookmark and Share

In a day that saw a filled-to-the-brim press conference in the Governor's Reception Room, a mini-protest by the Minnesota Coalition for a People’s Bailout, and some not so thinly veiled and unsolicited advice by the DFL leadership as to what the Governor should do with his economic and job development team, the first battle lines were drawn in what should be a fascinating new legislative session in St. Paul next year.

Minnesota's Finance Commissioner Tom Hanson and state economist Tom Stinson started the day by laying out the bad news in a budget forecast announcement that revealed a $426 million deficit in the 2008-2009 biennium and a $4.8 billion deficit for 2010-2011. Stinson stated the current state of the economy is “just plain ugly? and the “worst economy in 25 years and perhaps the worst since World War II.?

A small gathering outside Room 15 at the Capitol offered their solution by repeating the chant, “Tax the rich! Tax the rich! Hey politicians we’ve got the fix!? The group, a new coalition called Minnesota Coalition for a People’s Bailout, is fearful the budget deficit will be borne on the backs of the poor. The coalition, which includes Deb Konechne of the Welfare Rights Committee of Minnesota, supports tax increases on the rich, although she was not able to provide a specific definition of what income level makes one rich enough to deserve such tax increases. Konechne summarized her coalition's position as, “Corporations are getting bailout after bailout – what we need is a people’s bailout.?

Perhaps the most curious strategic move of the afternoon occurred during Governor Tim Pawlenty’s press conference. The Governor led his discussion of the budget crisis by advertising the fact that Minnesota ranked just 36th in job growth during the past five years – at a growth rate of 3.46 percent. This is well behind its neighbors to the West:

· South Dakota (#13): 8.92 percent
· North Dakota (#14): 8.64 percent

And to the south:

· Iowa (#27): 5.46 percent

(Wisconsin, at #41, has had just a 2.57 percent job growth rate in the last five years).

Pawlenty highlighted this data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics to point out that of the 35 states ahead of Minnesota in job growth, only 6 had a higher per capita state and local government-spending rate. Pawlenty offered this correlation as causation to bolster his point that Minnesota needs to “Spend less not more to increase its growth.?

With an economy that is not growing – and perhaps receding – Pawlenty said the 19 percent average spending increases sustained in the state’s General Fund over the past 50 years is “Not sustainable, and not responsible. The math doesn’t work.?

When it was pointed out to the Governor that he had overseen more deficits than surpluses in his tenure, Pawlenty did not take the bait and excuse away those facts with national and international circumstances beyond his control: “I don’t consider myself a victim,? he stated flatly. However, earlier in his remarks, Pawlenty severely criticized the federal government, its stimulus package(s), and its mindset to “Pay credit card debt with credit cards.? Pawlenty accused the federal government as being “engaged in a very elabroate ponzi scheme? that is “out of control? and “addicted to a culture of debt.?

DFL House Majority Leader Tony Sertich picked up on the job growth data introduced by Pawlenty earlier in the afternoon, emphasizing, along with DFL House Speaker Margaret Anderson Kelliher, that “This is not a revenue problem, this is a jobs problem.?

Does that mean the DFL is not considering raising taxes this session? “It’s important to keep everything on the table,? said Sertich.

The DFL echoed Governor Pawlenty’s call to trim the budget, but stated there is no silver bullet to the state’s economic woes and anyone who says there is a single solution on Day 1 is “neither serious nor thoughtful,? according to Sertich. This may have been a subtle jab at the Governor who is adamant about not raising taxes.

The DFL refused at this time to prioritize their budget as Pawlenty had done in his news conference: 1) Military and veterans, 2) Public safety, and 3) K-12 Education. Sertich maintained no budget area is off the table.

Emphasizing the need for the state to be more aggressive in creating jobs in research and development, green technology, and bio-medical fields, Speaker Kelliher stated, “What we are doing is not working in the economic development area.? Majority leader Pogemiller took that as a cue to offer his solution: “We need a new set of leadership in that area. I don’t think I could be more clear. We need a new set of leadership in the job development area.? (i.e. Commissioner Dan McElroy of the Department of Employment and Economic Development).

Smart Politics will continue its expanded coverage of state politics in the new legislative session, mindful of what one interested citizen from Chaska offered to me about political bloggers at the budget briefing earlier today. The elderly man stated he doesn’t trust bloggers and likened reading political blogs to, “Going to McDonalds and talking politics with eight to ten old folks drinking coffee. After you leave you feel like you didn’t learn anything.? The skeptic admitted however, that "You do feel better about yourself if you happened to have agreed with them." Smart Politics, as a nonpartisan blog, is an equal opportunity offender; therefore, while it is certain we will not make our entire audience “feel good,? we will strive to serve our primary mission, and that is to insure that our readership learn something.

Previous post: Today At The Capitol: Round 1 of the Budget Battle
Next post: Tweedledum, Tweedledee: A Statistical Correlation of Ballot Challenges in the MN Senate Recount

2 Comments


  • I'm actually a bit surprised by Pawlenty's reactions this early in the game. Not only is he taking taxes off the table -- which is to be expected, though I didn't think he'd be so adamant at this point -- but he also slammed the lid down on Rep. Brod and Sen. Michel's discussion about privatizing state assets.

  • > but he also slammed the lid down on Rep. Brod and Sen.
    > Michel's discussion about privatizing state assets.

    I was also struck by the cavalier, almost sarcastic demeanor in which Pawlenty dismissed fellow GOPer Brod's recommendations.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting