Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Upper Midwestern Reapportionment, Part II: A Historical Overview

Bookmark and Share

In a follow-up to yesterday’s discussion of the 2012 projected reapportionment, Smart Politics presents two tables to illustrate the diminishing political influence of Minnesota and the Upper Midwestern battleground states in the U.S. House as a result of population shifts in the United States.

Table 1 demonstrates how the projected reapportionment in 2012 will give Minnesota its fewest number of seats since the 1893-1903 sessions of Congress (7 seats) and how the region collectively will send the fewest number of Representatives to the lower chamber since 1863-1873.

Table 1. Number of Upper Midwestern Battleground State U.S. House Seats By Decade

Years
MN Seats
WI Seats
IA Seats
Total Seats
1849-1853
0
3
2
5
1853-1863
2
3
2
7
1863-1873
2
6
6
14
1873-1883
3
8
9
20
1883-1893
5
9
11
25
1893-1903
7
10
11
28
1903-1913
9
11
11
31
1913-1923
10
11
11
32
1923-1933
10
11
11
32
1933-1943
9
10
9
28
1943-1953
9
10
8
27
1953-1963
9
10
8
27
1963-1973
8
10
7
25
1973-1983
8
9
6
23
1983-1993
8
9
6
23
1993-2003
8
9
5
22
2003-2013
8
8
5
21
2013-2023*
7
8
4
19
* Projected

Table 2 compiles the average number of seats in the U.S. House for each ten-year period, and then calculates the percentage of seats held in the lower chamber by each of the three Upper Midwestern states and the region overall.

This analysis finds Minnesota will tally its lowest percentage of seats in the House after the 2012 reapportionment (at 1.6 percent) since the 1883-1893 sessions, and Iowa (at 0.9 percent) will match its all-time lowest percentage of Representatives sent to D.C. since statehood.

The Upper Midwestern battleground region overall will only account for 4.4 percent of seats in the U.S. House – its lowest mark since the 1853-1863 sessions. This marks a 44.3 percent drop in the region's share of Representatives since its peak in the 1903-1913 period.

Table 2. Percentage of Upper Midwestern Battleground State U.S. House Seats By Decade

Years
US House Seats*
% MN
% WI
% IA
% Total Seats
1849-1853
233
0.0
1.3
0.9
2.1
1853-1863
225
0.9
1.3
0.9
3.1
1863-1873
218
0.9
2.8
2.8
6.4
1873-1883
293
1.0
2.7
3.1
6.8
1883-1893
328
1.5
2.7
3.4
7.6
1893-1903
357
2.0
2.8
3.1
7.8
1903-1913
390
2.3
2.8
2.8
7.9
1913-1923
435
2.3
2.5
2.5
7.4
1923-1933
435
2.3
2.5
2.5
7.4
1933-1943
435
2.1
2.3
2.1
6.4
1943-1953
435
2.1
2.3
1.8
6.2
1953-1963
436
2.1
2.3
1.8
6.2
1963-1973
435
1.8
2.3
1.6
5.7
1973-1983
435
1.8
2.1
1.4
5.3
1983-1993
435
1.8
2.1
1.4
5.3
1993-2003
435
1.8
2.1
1.1
5.1
2003-2013
435
1.8
1.8
1.1
4.8
2013-2023**
435
1.6
1.8
0.9
4.4
* Denotes average number of Representatives elected to the U.S. House during each 10-year period.

** Projected


Previous post: How Much Will 2012 Reapportionment Reduce Minnesota’s Political Influence?
Next post: Obama's Near Misses Northwest of the Mississippi

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Kevin McCarthy Becomes Least Tenured Floor Leader in US House History

At less than four terms, McCarthy has served 423 fewer days in the chamber than any floor leader in U.S. House history and almost 10 years less than the average leader.

Political Crumbs

The Second Time Around

Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


How Are the Plurality Winners Doing?

Nearly 40 percent of plurality winners of U.S. Senate elections lose their seat in the next election cycle. Will that happen to any of the three such incumbents on the ballot in 2014? Recent polling suggests Democrats Al Franken of Minnesota, Mark Begich of Alaska, and Jeff Merkley of Oregon all currently have an advantage over their nominated/frontrunning GOP opponents, but each is flirting with plurality support once again. Franken led endorsed GOPer Mike McFadden 48 to 42 percent in a new SurveyUSA poll while the polling group showed Merkley with a 50 to 32 percent advantage over Monica Wehby. Begich led each of the three major GOP candidates in last month's PPP survey: 42 to 37 percent over Daniel Sullivan, 41 to 33 percent over Mead Treadwell, and 43 to 27 percent over Joe Miller.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting