Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Upper Midwestern Reapportionment, Part II: A Historical Overview

Bookmark and Share

In a follow-up to yesterday’s discussion of the 2012 projected reapportionment, Smart Politics presents two tables to illustrate the diminishing political influence of Minnesota and the Upper Midwestern battleground states in the U.S. House as a result of population shifts in the United States.

Table 1 demonstrates how the projected reapportionment in 2012 will give Minnesota its fewest number of seats since the 1893-1903 sessions of Congress (7 seats) and how the region collectively will send the fewest number of Representatives to the lower chamber since 1863-1873.

Table 1. Number of Upper Midwestern Battleground State U.S. House Seats By Decade

Years
MN Seats
WI Seats
IA Seats
Total Seats
1849-1853
0
3
2
5
1853-1863
2
3
2
7
1863-1873
2
6
6
14
1873-1883
3
8
9
20
1883-1893
5
9
11
25
1893-1903
7
10
11
28
1903-1913
9
11
11
31
1913-1923
10
11
11
32
1923-1933
10
11
11
32
1933-1943
9
10
9
28
1943-1953
9
10
8
27
1953-1963
9
10
8
27
1963-1973
8
10
7
25
1973-1983
8
9
6
23
1983-1993
8
9
6
23
1993-2003
8
9
5
22
2003-2013
8
8
5
21
2013-2023*
7
8
4
19
* Projected

Table 2 compiles the average number of seats in the U.S. House for each ten-year period, and then calculates the percentage of seats held in the lower chamber by each of the three Upper Midwestern states and the region overall.

This analysis finds Minnesota will tally its lowest percentage of seats in the House after the 2012 reapportionment (at 1.6 percent) since the 1883-1893 sessions, and Iowa (at 0.9 percent) will match its all-time lowest percentage of Representatives sent to D.C. since statehood.

The Upper Midwestern battleground region overall will only account for 4.4 percent of seats in the U.S. House – its lowest mark since the 1853-1863 sessions. This marks a 44.3 percent drop in the region's share of Representatives since its peak in the 1903-1913 period.

Table 2. Percentage of Upper Midwestern Battleground State U.S. House Seats By Decade

Years
US House Seats*
% MN
% WI
% IA
% Total Seats
1849-1853
233
0.0
1.3
0.9
2.1
1853-1863
225
0.9
1.3
0.9
3.1
1863-1873
218
0.9
2.8
2.8
6.4
1873-1883
293
1.0
2.7
3.1
6.8
1883-1893
328
1.5
2.7
3.4
7.6
1893-1903
357
2.0
2.8
3.1
7.8
1903-1913
390
2.3
2.8
2.8
7.9
1913-1923
435
2.3
2.5
2.5
7.4
1923-1933
435
2.3
2.5
2.5
7.4
1933-1943
435
2.1
2.3
2.1
6.4
1943-1953
435
2.1
2.3
1.8
6.2
1953-1963
436
2.1
2.3
1.8
6.2
1963-1973
435
1.8
2.3
1.6
5.7
1973-1983
435
1.8
2.1
1.4
5.3
1983-1993
435
1.8
2.1
1.4
5.3
1993-2003
435
1.8
2.1
1.1
5.1
2003-2013
435
1.8
1.8
1.1
4.8
2013-2023**
435
1.6
1.8
0.9
4.4
* Denotes average number of Representatives elected to the U.S. House during each 10-year period.

** Projected


Previous post: How Much Will 2012 Reapportionment Reduce Minnesota’s Political Influence?
Next post: Obama's Near Misses Northwest of the Mississippi

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting