Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Franken's (Apparent) Victory Is 4th Weakest U.S. Senate Performance in DFL History

Bookmark and Share

Throughout his U.S. Senate campaign, Al Franken was dogged by criticisms, even peppered from within his own party, that he was a 'weak candidate' for the DFL. These criticisms took many forms, such as stern words regarding Franken's writings and temperament from respected DFL U.S. Representative Betty McCollum to the DFL primary challenge launched by Priscilla Lord Faris.

But, above all, intraparty criticisms against Franken were borne out of the cold hard polling data that frequently found its nominee struggling to gain an advantage over Republican Norm Coleman in an election year in which Barack Obama was set to easily carry the Gopher State (which he eventually did, by 10+ points).

While still hoping that Franken would overtake Norm Coleman's Election Day vote tally advantage, many DFLers and liberal blogs continued to lament how they ended up with the famous satirist as their 2008 candidate through the past two months. The rationale of their discontent was simply this: in an election year in which the top of the DFL ticket carried the state by a double-digit margin, why is the DFL even in a position to need a recount to win its Senate race?

All may well be forgiven if ultimately Franken holds onto his 225-vote lead he has amassed to date in the recount process. But the truth remains, just as Norm Coleman overperformed in the face of historically staggering odds, Al Franken clearly underperformed in the current political and ideological environment.

A Smart Politics analysis of Minnesota's historical U.S. Senate election returns finds Franken's performance to be the 4th worst out of the 22 DFL nominees on the ballot in general elections since the DFL merger in 1944, when measured against the performance of DFLers at the top of the ticket in presidential and gubernatorial elections held that year. (Note: by comparing margin of victories and not vote percentages, the impact of Independence Party candidate Dean Barkley on the Senate race is minimized in this historical analysis).

Whether or not Franken prevails against Coleman's likely election contest, only three other DFL candidates will have sustained a worse net margin of victory or loss vis-à-vis the DFL performance at the top of the ticket than Franken's 10.2 point net marginal deficit to Barack Obama. Only Mark Dayton in 1982 (24.9 net points behind Rudy Perpich), Hubert Humphrey III in 1988 (22.3 net points behind Michael Dukakis), and Joan Anderson Growe in 1984 (17.0 net points behind Walter Mondale) incurred a larger net margin of victory or loss.

Franken's weak performance comes on the heels of a string of 5-straight elections dating back to 1990 in which the DFL Senate nominee performed comparatively stronger than the top of the ticket, both in victory (Amy Klobuchar in 2006, Paul Wellstone in 1996 and 1990) and in loss (Walter Mondale in 2002, Ann Wynia in 1994).

As a result, just as Norm Coleman's performance will be noted for being historically strong, Franken's victory will be noted for being historically weak, and thus all the more remarkable in victory, should he prevail.

Strongest DFL U.S. Senate Margin of Victories Vis-à-vis Top of the Ticket Voting, 1946-2008

Year
DFL Candidate
DFL US Senate
DFL President
DFL Governor
Difference
1976
Hubert H. Humphrey
42.5
12.9
+29.6
1994
Ann Wynia
-5.0
-29.2
+24.2
2006
Amy Klobuchar
20.2
-1.0
+21.2
1972
Walter Mondale
13.8
-5.5
+19.3
1966
Walter Mondale
8.7
-5.7
+14.4
1960
Hubert H. Humphrey
15.3
1.4
+13.9
1954
Hubert H. Humphrey
14.3
5.9
+8.4
1970
Hubert H. Humphrey
16.2
8.5
+7.7
2000
Mark Dayton
9.0
2.4
+6.6
1990
Paul Wellstone
2.6
-3.3
+5.9
2002
Walter Mondale
-2.2
-7.9
+5.7
1948
Hubert H. Humphrey
20.0
17.3
+2.7
1946
Theodore Jorgenson
-19.1
-19.3
+0.2
1952
William E. Carlson
-14.1
-11.2
-2.9
1964
Eugene J. McCarthy
21.0
27.8
-6.8
1958
Eugene J. McCarthy
6.3
14.5
-8.2
1996
Paul Wellstone
9.0
16.1
-9.1
1978
Wendell Anderson
-16.2
-7.0
-9.2
2008
Al Franken
0.0
10.2
-10.2
1984
Joan Anderson Growe
-16.8
0.2
-17.0
1988
Hubert Humphrey III
-15.3
7.0
-22.3
1982
Mark Dayton
-6.0
18.9
-24.9

Previous post: Franken Has Big Edge in County Distribution of Absentee Ballots
Next post: Will Al Franken Be the Favorite in 2014?

8 Comments


  • The headline is incredibly misleading. A "weak" performance is based on margin of victory or loss, not comparison to other candidates.

  • Sounds like sour grapes to me. If this election had gone for Coleman you would be trying to convince me this is really the only democratic way to solve issues. How bold one is when their candidate is ahead.

  • > The headline is incredibly misleading. A "weak" performance
    > is based on margin of victory or loss, not comparison to other
    > candidates.

    If that is your definition of the criteria, then Franken had the weakest possible margin of victory in state history for a US Senate candidate of either party.

  • Bill - are you addressing me? If so, I'm not quite sure what you mean.

    Eric - That's about true. So what? He unseated an incumbent - never an easy thing to do, regardless of the year. Coleman turned in a "weaker" performance, all the more embarrassing since he was the incumbent and (I believe) raised more money. You can bet that Senator-elect Franken won't be crying into his beer about his weakness compared to President-elect Obama, nor will former Sen. Coleman be crowing about his strong performance compared to Sen. McCain.

  • History and the political environment in which an election takes place matters if one is to draw comparisons and situate elections in their proper context. To learn the facts about what Coleman was facing in this election read my blog from late November:

    http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cspg/smartpolitics/2008/11/coleman_victory_would_be_the_g.php

    He may not be doing cartwheels in defeat, but his performance was historically strong under the circumstances.

  • The context certainly matters - but I think the result matters a lot more. According to your data, Ann Wynia put up the second-strongest Senate performance in DFL history, and still got pretty well trounced. The "strong" performance didn't help Wynia and didn't help the Democrats. Strong candidates go a long ways towards making their own contexts, like Sen. Tim Johnson of SD, winning as a Democrat in 2002, a truly ugly year for Democrats.

  • The missing factor here is that Franken is the only one to have faced a strong third party challenger. I know of no polls asking Barkley voters how they would have voted in a two-way runoff, but from all I can tell, Barkley hurt Franken more than Coleman, so that throws the weakness of Franken's win into question. A more valid comparison might be to other races with strong third parties, even if they weren't senate races. Franken did better than other DFL candidates with a strong IP candidate on the ballot.

  • > Franken did better than other DFL candidates with a strong IP
    > candidate on the ballot.

    Though that is largely countered by the exceedingly favorable partisan (pro-democrat) environment that Franken found himself in during the 2008 campaign (approximately 40 percent of Minnesotans identified themselves as Democrats at the time of the election (SurveyUSA), and just 25 percent as independents - much lower than the 35 to 40 percent independents reached just a few years prior). As such, I would argue, the relative weakness of Franken's performance holds.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Which States Have the Longest and Shortest Election Day Voting Hours?

    Residents in some North Dakota towns have less than half as many hours to cast their ballots as those in New York State.

    Political Crumbs

    Does My Key Still Work?

    Much has been made about Charlie Crist's political transformation from Republican to independent to Democrat en route to winning the Florida GOP and Democratic gubernatorial nominations over a span of eight years. Party-switching aside, Crist is also vying to become just the second Florida governor to serve two interrupted terms. Democrat William Bloxham was the first - serving four year terms from 1881 to 1885 and then 1897 to 1901. Florida did not permit governors serving consecutive terms for most of its 123 years prior to changes made in its 1968 constitution. Since then four have done so: Democrats Reubin Askew, Bob Graham, and Lawton Chiles and Republican Jeb Bush.


    No 100-Year Curse for Roberts

    Defeating his Tea Party primary challenger Milton Wolf with just 48.1 percent of the vote, Pat Roberts narrowly escaped becoming the first elected U.S. Senator from Kansas to lose a renomination bid in 100 years. The last - and so far only - elected U.S. Senator to lose a Kansas primary was one-term Republican Joseph Bristow in 1914. Bristow was defeated by former U.S. Senator Charles Curtis who went on to win three terms before becoming Herbert Hoover's running mate in 1928. Only one other U.S. Senator from the Sunflower State has lost a primary since the passage of the 17th Amendment: Sheila Frahm in 1996. Frahm was appointed to fill Bob Dole's seat earlier that year and finished 13.2 points behind Sam Brownback in the three-candidate primary field. Overall, incumbent senators from Kansas have won 29 times against two defeats in the direct vote era. (Curtis also lost a primary in 1912 to Walter Stubbs, one year before the nation moved to direct elections).


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting