Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Will the Minnesota-Wisconsin Shared State Services Plan Work?

Bookmark and Share

On Tuesday, Minnesota Republican Governor Tim Pawlenty and Wisconsin Democratic Governor Jim Doyle signed executive orders calling for department heads to identify, by the end of February, "Specific activities, programs, and services ... for potential cooperative service arrangements." The orders were signed to create "Significant improvements to the delivery and cost-effectiveness of state services."

Areas outlined for potential shared services in a Pawlenty press release include state contract procurement of software, equipment, and institutional food, real estate and state vehicles, prison industries and facilities, call centers, and agricultural, fishery, and nursery operations.

While the budget crises faced by each state is the impetus for the cooperative measures, Governor Pawlenty's executive order cites the "many similarities" the two states enjoy as the rationale for the partnership. The idea is that Minnesota and Wisconsin share more than simply a border - they also share similar administrative needs and demographic characteristics.

Does the governors' reasoning hold? Exactly how similar are the Gopher and Badger States?

As it turns out, quite similar, and by many measures.

While the population of Wisconsin is approximately 400,000 more than that of Minnesota (5.601 to 5.198 million), they are ranked back-to-back as 20th and 21st most populous states in the country.

Prison industries and facilities were some of the areas listed as avenues for shared services - the two states also face similar levels of violent crime (both far below the national average). According to the F.B.I.'s Uniform Crime Reports, the two states have nearly identical violent crime rates: 288.7 in Minnesota and 290.9 in Wisconsin (incidents per 100,000 residents, 2007 UCR data).

In the arena of social services, the states are in the top echelon in the country in health insurance coverage. The states are ranked back-to-back in the percentage of residents without health insurance: just 8.8 percent in Minnesota (47th highest) and 8.5 percent in Wisconsin (48th).

The states also consistently boast high levels of civic participation - as demonstrated by their 1-2 ranking in voter turnout in recent presidential elections (including 2008).

On the economic front, both states face multi-billion dollar budget deficits in 2010-2011: approximately $4.8 billion in Minnesota and $5.4 billion in Wisconsin.

Wisconsin has not been hit as hard as of yet in job layoffs - the state's 5.6 percent seasonally adjusted unemployment rate is just the 34th highest in the country, while Minnesota's 6.4 percent rate is 19th in the nation (according to November projections by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics).

Minnesota, however, has a much higher state gross domestic product: the Gopher State's $41,353 per capita GDP is 8th in the country, whereas Wisconsin's $34,890 per capita GDP is ranked just 29th - well below the national average of $38,020, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Economic Analysis 2007 data.

The devil, of course, is not only in the details, but also in the administration of any new governmental plan. But although the partnership laid out by Pawlenty and Doyle is not a panacea for the economic ills faced by the states (no projections of savings to the government have been offered by Pawlenty), it appears to be at least a baby step in the right direction on its face - one of many, many cost saving measures the Pawlenty administration is going to need to take in his fight against likely DFL revenue-raising legislation.

Previous post: Coleman Popularity Virtually Unchanged Since Election Day, Despite Recent Poll Headline
Next post: 12 Days And Counting: Minnesota Already At 4th Longest Stint Without Two Senators in State History

1 Comment


  • Is this a precursor to a solution of our health care delivery system administered on a regional rather than federal level?

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Plurality-Winning Governors Elected At Century-Long High Water Mark

    The rate of gubernatorial candidates elected without the support of a majority of voters is at its highest level since the 1910s.

    Political Crumbs

    Seeing Red

    Congressman Nick Rahall's failed bid for a 20th term in West Virginia this cycle, combined with a narrow loss by Nick Casey to Alex Mooney in Shelley Moore Capito's open seat, means that West Virginia Democrats will be shut out of the state's U.S. House delegation for the first time in over 90 years. The Republican sweep by two-term incumbent David McKinley in the 1st CD, Mooney in the 2nd, and Evan Jenkins over Rahall in the 3rd marks the first time the GOP has held all seats in the chamber from West Virginia since the Election of 1920. During the 67th Congress (1921-1923) all six seats from the state were controlled by the GOP. Since the Election of 1922, Democrats have won 76 percent of all U.S. House elections in the Mountain State - capturing 172 seats compared to 54 for the GOP.


    Home Field Advantage?

    When the 114th Congress convenes in a few days, Maine will be represented by one home-grown U.S. Representative: Waterville-born Republican Bruce Poliquin. With the departure of Millinocket-born Mike Michaud, who launched a failed gubernatorial bid, the Pine Tree State was poised to send a House delegation to D.C. without any Maine-born members for the first time since 1821. Three-term U.S. Rep. Chellie Pingree (born in Minnesota) coasted to reelection as expected, however Poliquin edged Kentucky-born Emily Cain by 5.3 points to keep the streak alive. Since 1876, a total of 208 of the 222 candidates elected to the nation's lower legislative chamber from the state have been born in Maine, or 94 percent.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting