Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Obama's Economic and Fiscal Crises Address: An End, Or a Means to an End?

Bookmark and Share

Although President Barack Obama’s first Address before a joint session of Congress Tuesday evening was pitched by the White House as a "plan to confront our nation’s economic and fiscal crises,” more than 70 percent of his speech focused on other domestic or foreign policy issues.

A Smart Politics content analysis of Obama’s speech reveals, as expected, that the President was much less focused on foreign affairs in this speech than his predecessor, George W. Bush. In his 2008 State of the Union Address, 56.6 percent of Bush’s speech (measured by the number of sentences delivered) discussed the nation’s foreign policy challenges, including Iraq (16.5 percent), national security (6.4 percent), trade (5.5 percent), and terrorism (4.9 percent).

In Obama’s address on Tuesday, only 10.3 percent of his speech addressed foreign policy issues, with only 2 sentences on Iraq (compared to 54 for Bush a year ago) and just 6 lines on terrorism (compared to 16 for Bush).

Obama’s focus was plainly on domestic policy, with 76.1 percent of his speech addressing concerns at home, compared to just 35.0 percent for Bush in 2008.

General Policy Areas in Presidential Addresses Before Congress, 2008-2009

Policy area
Bush 1/28/08
Obama 2/24/09
Domestic
35.0
76.1
Foreign
56.6
10.3
Other (non-policy)
8.3
13.6
Source: Content analysis by Smart Politics.

However, despite being the White House’s selling point for the Address, the economy and jobs (10.0 percent) and the nation’s struggling financial system and credit problems (17.9 percent) barely accounted for a quarter of Obama’s speech.

Instead, Obama spent an even greater amount of his time before the captive American audience on education (12.1 percent), health care (9.3 percent), and energy policy (7.9 percent) – totaling more than 28 percent of his speech overall. In 2008, President Bush spent only 11.6 percent of his speech on these three issues.

Tied together with his remarks on and justifications for government spending (12.5 percent of the speech), Obama seized the moment to lay out some of his administration's bold domestic priorities (e.g. green energy, universal health care), under the guise of, and loosely tied to, a speech sold as a plan to address the nation's economic and fiscal crises.

True, Obama did attempt to make direct linkages between these priorities and the national crises at hand. On the issue of energy, Obama laid out his renewable energy plan in the context of, “making our homes and buildings more efficient so that we can save billions of dollars on our energy bills.”

But the linkages were not always so clean. For example, Obama claimed the “crushing cost of health care…(would) cause 1.5 million Americans to lose their homes.”

Already heralded as one of the great orators ever to hold the nation's highest office, Obama peppered his speech with several passages of vague language meant to inspire a nation in crisis, and reassure the country that Americans will courageously face all of its great challenges:

“We are not quitters…even in the most trying times, amid the most difficult circumstances, there is a generosity, a resilience, a decency, and a determination that perseveres; a willingness to take responsibility for our future and for posterity.”

More than 11 percent of Obama’s speech spoke loosely on these general challenges America must face, compared to just 3.1 percent by his predecessor in 2008, who, to be sure, was not known for his oratory skills.

In other words, just as Republicans criticized the passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act for programs in the legislation that do not seem directly related to stimulating the economy and rebuilding the nation’s financial institutions (to the tune of several billion dollars), so too did Obama’s admittedly well-delivered speech on the nation’s economic and fiscal crises drift off into other subjects and policy areas (to the tune of nearly three-quarters of his Address).

Specific Policies in Presidential Addresses Before Congress, 2008-2009

Issue
Bush'08
Percent
Obama'09
Percent
Financial system
0
0.0
50
17.9
Government spending
11
3.4
35
12.5
Education
19
5.8
34
12.1
Challenges for America
10
3.1
31
11.1
Economy / jobs
13
4.0
28
10.0
Health care
8
2.4
26
9.3
Energy
11
3.4
22
7.9
Taxes
17
5.2
8
2.9
Terrorism
16
4.9
6
3.1
Veterans
12
3.7
6
3.1
Housing
7
2.1
6
2.1
Bi-partisanship
3
0.9
5
1.8
Entitlements
4
1.2
4
2.1
Transportation
0
0.0
4
1.4
Foreign relations (general)
0
0.0
3
1.1
Iraq
54
16.5
2
1.0
Afghanistan
8
2.4
2
1.0
Formal remarks
1
0.3
2
0.7
Trade
18
5.5
1
0.5
Israel
5
1.5
1
0.5
Technology
4
1.2
1
0.5
Religion
1
0.3
1
0.5
Crime
0
0.0
1
0.5
Agriculture
0
0.0
1
0.4
National security
21
6.4
0
0.0
World Freedom
16
4.9
0
0.0
Individualism
13
4.0
0
0.0
Iran
13
4.0
0
0.0
World aid
12
3.7
0
0.0
Immigration
10
3.1
0
0.0
Charities
6
1.8
0
0.0
Judiciary
4
1.2
0
0.0
Natural disasters
4
1.2
0
0.0
Stem cells
3
0.9
0
0.0
Cloning
3
0.9
0
0.0
Total
327
100.0
280
100.0
Source: Content analysis by Smart Politics. Unit of measurement is a sentence.



Previous post: Despite Democratic Shift, Minnesotans Are No More Liberal Than Four Years Ago
Next post: The Unsinkable Michele Bachmann

3 Comments


  • Hope to see some efforts put into the energy policy of our country.

  • I did not hear much about the automotive industry lately. I may have missed it in his speeches.

  • Sure glad he was talking about universal health care. So many Americans can't even afford basic living necessities and he wants to charge them 25% on everything that they buy. Great idea! What an idiot. How can we as a nations pay for the health care costs when we are 11 trillion dollars in debt. There is no way we can afford that right now. The best thing that we can do is stop spending/printing money. We need to stabilize before we can start giving away more government money. Oops, i mean our money.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Gender Equality in the US House: A State-by State Quarter-Century Report Card (1989-2014)

    A study of 5,325 congressional elections finds the number of female U.S. Representatives has more than tripled over the last 25 years, but the rate at which women are elected to the chamber still varies greatly between the states.

    Political Crumbs

    Final Four Has Presidential Approval

    By edging Michigan in the final seconds Sunday, the University of Kentucky guaranteed that one school in the Final Four this year would be located in a state that was not carried by President Barack Obama in 2012. (Connecticut, Florida, and Wisconsin had previously earned Final Four slots over the weekend). Across the 76 Final Fours since 1939, an average of 3.1 schools have been located in states won by the president's ticket during the previous election cycle. All four schools have come from states won by the president 29 times, with the most recent being the 2009 Final Four featuring Connecticut, Michigan State, North Carolina, and Villanova. On 30 occasions three Final Four schools have been located in states won by the president, with two schools 11 times and only one school six times (the most recent being 2012 with Kansas, Kentucky, Louisville, and Ohio State). There has never been a Men's NCAA Division I Final Four in which no schools were located in states carried by the president's ticket.


    Three for the Road

    A new Rasmussen Poll shows Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker in a dead heat with likely 2014 Democratic nominee Mary Burke. Walker is seeking to win his third consecutive election after prevailing in 2012's recall contest. Eight of his predecessors accomplished this feat: Republicans Lucius Fairchild (in 1869), Jeremiah Rusk (1886), Robert La Follette (1904), Emanuel Philipp (1918), John Blaine (1924), Walter Kohler (1954), Warren Knowles (1968), and Tommy Thompson (1994). Three others Badger State governors lost on their third campaign: Democrat George Peck (1894), Progressive Philip La Follette (1938), and Republican Julius Heil (1942). One died in office before having the opportunity to win a third contest (GOPer Walter Goodland in 1947) while another resigned beforehand (Democrat Patrick Lucey in 1977 to become Ambassador to Mexico). Overall Wisconsin gubernatorial incumbents have won 35 of 47 general election contests, or 74.5 percent of the time.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting