Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


An Occupational Profile of Norm Coleman's Campaign Donor List

Bookmark and Share

The many bits of information made available from the leak of the Norm Coleman U.S. Senate campaign donor database, posted at Wikileaks on Wednesday, gives the public a glimpse into what type of people supported the Republican incumbent's candidacy.

On Thursday, Smart Politics broke down the donor data by state; today this blog examines the occupation of those Coleman contributors whose identity was compromised in the database leak. While this list, first exposed in late January 2009, does not document the sum total of all Coleman reelection campaign donors, it does provide an interesting snapshot of those contributing to his campaign.

Although elite professionals top the list - with the legal profession, medical profession, middle management, and CEOs comprising 4 of the top 6 slots - they only tally about one-quarter of all donors (25.5 percent) on this list.

Excluding retirees (who, at 500 strong, contributed the most (10.6 percent)), attorneys and those involved in the legal profession were the most frequent contributors, with 349 giving to Coleman's campaign from this donor list (7.4 percent).

The medical profession was the third largest group, with 317 donors, followed by homemakers with 307.

Those associated with business and finance comprised the largest subgroup - led by middle management (299), CEOs and executives (241), small business owners (190), accountants (183), salespersons (157), financial advisers and stock brokers (128), real estate interests (89), business analysts (70), insurance interests (41), banking interests (40), and those involved in marketing (39). Combined, these groups totaled 31.1 percent of donors whose private information was leaked.

Observers may be surprised to find a fair number of contributors from groups frequently associated with supporting Democratic candidates: K-12 educators (101), academics (86), students (51), writers and publishers (47), and artists and musicians (26) totaled 6.6 percent of the list.

Although more than 300 medical practitioners appeared on the list, relatively few individuals involved in the pharmaceutical (20) or health services industries (15) contributed to Coleman's campaign.

Traditional blue-collar workers, such as truckers (23), factory workers (10), and maintenance workers (10) did not constitute a significant number of Coleman's financial supporters.

Norm Coleman's Compromised Campaign Donors, By Occupation

Rank
Profession
Number
Percent
1
Retirees
500
10.6
2
Attorneys / legal
349
7.4
3
Medical profession
317
6.7
4
Homemakers
307
6.5
5
Middle management
299
6.3
6
CEOs / executives
241
5.1
7
Small business owners
190
4.0
8
Accountants
183
3.9
9
Sales
157
3.3
10
Consultants
133
2.8
11
Information technology
131
2.8
12
Financial advisers / brokers
128
2.7
13
Education (K-12)
101
2.1
14
Real estate
89
1.9
15
Academics
86
1.8
16
Administrative assistants
75
1.6
17
Other business (analysts)
70
1.4
18
Software industry
62
1.3
19
Government employees
54
1.1
20
Students
51
1.1
21
Scientists
48
1.0
22
Writers and publishers
47
1.0
23
Contractors
46
1.0
24
Engineering
44
0.9
24
Design / architects
44
0.9
26
Insurance
41
0.9
27
Banking
40
0.8
28
Marketing
39
0.8
29
Armed services
34
0.7
29
Clergy
34
0.7
31
Airline industry
32
0.7
32
Artists / musicians
26
0.6
33
Truckers / drivers
23
0.5
34
Law enforcement / security
21
0.4
35
Pharmaceutical industry
20
0.4
36
Farmers
16
0.3
37
Health services
15
0.3
38
Advertising
14
0.3
39
Food industry
12
0.3
40
Factory
11
0.2
40
Maintenance
11
0.2
Other
270
5.7
No response
294
6.2
Total
4,715
100.0

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Coleman's Compromised Donors: Where They Came From
Next post: On Why Analyzing the Leaked Coleman Data Is Ethical: A Reply to My Critics

5 Comments


  • This was a comprised private list. In other words, not for public knowledge. What you just did compounded the problem.

  • > This was a comprised private list. In other words, not for public
    > knowledge. What you just did compounded the problem.

    I am using aggregate information only. This blog will not post any information identifying individual donors.

  • Smart journalism, thanks.

  • what a great post. I really enjoyed reading it ... who knew! Well if you get a moment please take a look at my website http://www.rochesterhomesource.com

    Thanks, I look for to reading more posts.

  • I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

    Sarah

    http://www.lyricsdigs.com

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting