Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Beyond the War of Words At the Capitol: What's Next?

Bookmark and Share

During the House DFL leadership's press conference last Thursday in which they unveiled the broad strokes of their balanced budget plan, Speaker Margaret Anderson Kelliher and Majority Leader Tony Sertich used biting language to characterize the budget plan of their political opponent, Republican Governor Tim Pawlenty.

In defending their own budget proposals which include, in the Speaker's words, "progressive taxation," the DFL leadership criticized the Governor's budget as only offering "temporary money for a permanent problem."

Speaker Anderson Kelliher stated that an analysis performed by the Governor's own Office of Management and Budget shows the Governor's budget is $2.6 billion from being balanced. She added:

"I would say maybe there's a little bit of a house of mirrors going on in the Governor's budget and the Governor's budget might be best characterized as a little bit fake at this point in terms of its long-term effect on Minnesotan's lives."

The Speaker called the Governor's budget proposals "unreasonable," and then said, "It will be up to the Governor whether we can enact a balanced budget...One thing stands between Minnesotans and a balanced budget, and that is Governor Pawlenty."

The Speaker then hit the Governor on his signature issue of taxes - which Pawlenty continually states he is opposed to raising:

"The Governor has not been honest with Minnesotans about the last six years and his unending appetite for raising property taxes and putting taxes off on other levels of government."

Near the end of the DFL press conference, in a bit of gamesmanship, the Speaker instructed her aids to leave their slide behind which demonstrated how the DFL plan balanced the budget and the Governor's plan did not. She wryly stated it should be left for Minority Leader Marty Seifert to see during his press conference which followed immediately thereafter.

In his response, Rep. Seifert continued to speak plainly as he has for weeks as to how he thinks this budget battle will play out:

"I think when this gets through the process you're going to see some vetoes, you're going to see vetoes sustained, and we're going to have to start over."

In explaining how committed his GOP caucus is to oppose the DFL plan and prevent a veto override, Seifert quoted his GOP colleague Representative Jim Abeler (48B-Anoka), who told him: "I'm not interested in raising taxes to protect the welfare state." Abeler was one of the Override 6, who broke with his caucus a year ago to help pass a DFL transportation bill that included a gas tax increase provision.

How long will it take the DFL to get legislation up for a vote? Will Seifert's prediction of an ultimate stalemate be borne out? Will his caucus hold? And, if so, what would a compromise bill look like between the DFL House, Senate, and the Governor?

Seifert may share his insights on several of these matters when he speaks at the Humphrey Institute a week from Wednesday in a forum sponsored by the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance.

Leading for Minnesota's Future:
Public Forum with Minority Leader Marty Seifert

Wednesday, April 1, 2009
12:00 - 1:15pm
Cowles Auditorium
Humphrey Center
301 19th Ave S., Minneapolis

Previous post: Upper Midwest House Members Vote 18-5 in Favor of TARP Bailout Bonus Tax
Next post: Michele Bachmann on D.C.: "I'm a Foreign Correspondent On Enemy Lines"

1 Comment


  • Speaker Anderson Kelliher recently stated at an Apple Valley Town Hall meeting that we need to maintain the quality of Life in Minnesota. she is absolutely right about that.
    But the pervasive criminal RAPE of the Minnesota Taxpayer with this continuing frivolous and out of control spending over the last several years by both parties has done very little in maintaining the quality of life in our State.
    Just reflect what's happened over the last several decades. A state that was known for Super high technological innovation, the "silicon prairie" by such companies as Honeywell, Sperry, Unisys, Control Data Corporation, Cray Research, Network Systems, Seagate, et.al. the formerly biggest employers and producers.
    What have we now and where has the incredible Minnesota talent pool gone? Real Estate agents, Mortgage originators, Wind Farm speculators, House builders, Retailing, HMO's, Recruiters, Lawyers, unnecessary and unneeded infrastructure speculation, idiotic politicians, and of course glorious and beneficent State government "jobs". What waste of Minnesota Genius!
    Is it any wonder that shrewd venture capitalists and entrepreneurs have left in droves in this State's onerous business environment.
    The solution is clear. CUT SPENDING, LIQUIDATE the State's assets and lands, drastically decrease or eliminate taxes across the board. PRIVATIZE all activities now performed by the State Gov, PRIVATIZE education both K-12, and the Universities. Eliminate all funding for sports and facilities and channel resources for true education of the "mind" and for intellectual pursuits. And most importantly, restore individual Liberty and PROPERTY Rights!

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Slam Dunk: Will 36 Record Presidential Winning Streaks Continue in 2016?

    Three-dozen states are currently in the midst of their longest Democratic or Republican presidential winning streaks.

    Political Crumbs

    73 Months and Counting

    January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


    Two Dakotas, One Voice?

    For each of the last 24 presidential elections since 1920, North and South Dakota have voted in unison - casting their ballots for the same nominee. For 21 of these cycles (including each of the last 12 since 1968) Republicans carried the Dakotas with just three cycles going to the Democrats (1932, 1936, and 1964). This streak stands in contrast to the first few decades after statehood when North and South Dakota supported different nominees in four of the first seven cycles. North Dakota narrowly backed Populist James Weaver in 1892 while South Dakota voted for incumbent Republican Benjamin Harrison. In 1896, it was North Dakota backing GOPer William McKinley while South Dakota supported Democrat William Jennings Bryan by less than 200 votes. North Dakota voted Democratic in 1912 and 1916 supporting Woodrow Wilson while South Dakota cast its Electoral College votes for Progressive Teddy Roosevelt and Republican Charles Hughes respectively.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting