Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Obama Sustains Early Support in Minnesota; Falters in Wisconsin and Iowa

Bookmark and Share

SurveyUSA’s latest round of approval ratings for President Barack Obama have been released for a dozen states across the country, in polling conducted March 20-22 of 600 adults in each state.

Although the President has had a consistently higher job performance rating during the first three months of his tenure in states such as New York, Massachusetts, California, and Washington, in no state have Obama’s early supporters been as faithful as those in the State of Minnesota.

From January (64 percent) to March (61 percent), Obama has only lost 4.7 percent of his support in the Gopher State, the lowest of the 12 states polled each month by SurveyUSA. Obama received an approval rating of 62 percent in February in Minnesota.

By contrast, Obama has lost support among Wisconsinites at more than 5 times this rate. Falling at a 24.3 percent clip since his inauguration, the President has seen his approval rating drop from 70 percent in January to 53 percent in March in the Badger State – the largest dip across the 12 states. Obama's approval rating fell 11.7 percent since February (60 percent).

Obama is also seeing a larger than average erosion of early supporters in Iowa, where 57 percent now approve of the job he is doing as president, down 16.2 percent from January (68 percent) – the third largest drop in support among the 12 states polled by SurveyUSA. The President's job approval rating fell 9.5 percent since February in the Hawkeye State (63 percent).

Erosion of Approval for Barack Obama’s Performance as President

Rank
State
January
March
% Change
1
Minnesota
64
61
-4.7
2
New York
78
72
-7.7
3
Kentucky
62
56
-9.7
4
Washington
69
62
-10.1
5
Virginia
62
55
-11.3
6
Kansas
62
55
-11.3
7
Missouri
65
57
-12.3
8
Massachusetts
78
68
-12.8
9
California
77
67
-13.0
10
Iowa
68
57
-16.2
11
Alabama
60
47
-21.7
12
Wisconsin
70
53
-24.3
 
Average
68.0
59.2
-12.9
Note: As of post time, SurveyUSA had not yet released numbers for two states polled in its January and February rounds – New Mexico and Oregon.

Interestingly, Obama’s support is holding much stronger in states like Kentucky (56 percent, 9.7 percent drop), and Kansas (55 percent, 11.3 percent drop) – states in which Obama received only 41 and 42 percent of the presidential vote respectively.

Obama currently has an approval rating that is 15 points higher in Kentucky than the vote he received for president in that state. In Kansas the President is currently +13. Minnesota ranks in the middle of the pack with the President’s approval rating (61 percent) resting 7 points higher than his vote tally on Election Day (54 percent).

Only the State of Wisconsin finds Obama with a lower approval rating today (53 percent) than his statewide vote last November (56 percent) among these dozen states.

Obama Presidential Vote Share vs. March Approval Ratings

Rank
State
Vote
Approval
Difference
1
Kentucky
41
56
15
2
Kansas
42
55
13
3
New York
63
72
9
4
Alabama
39
47
8
5
Missouri
49
57
8
6
Minnesota
54
61
7
7
Massachusetts
62
68
6
8
California
61
67
6
9
Washington
57
62
5
10
Iowa
54
57
3
11
Virginia
53
55
2
12
Wisconsin
56
53
-3
Note: As of post time, SurveyUSA had not yet released numbers for two states polled in its January and February rounds – New Mexico and Oregon.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Practicing What He Preaches: Obama's (Safe) Post-Partisan NCAA Picks
Next post: Erik Paulsen's (Semi) Close Shave Could Get Closer in 2010

2 Comments


  • http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html#polls Ohh statistics. He was at 69%% in his first job approval poll since taking office, second only to Kennedy for the same time period, he got 72%. And Obama's mid-March approvals are higher than both Bushes, Clinton and Reagan in their first terms. Yeah, at least Minnesota is consistent. Who really expected Republicans to hold on though? We wish. With all that's on his plate and afoot for people though? I think that and just not enough to go on, is why you're seeing some of these stats all over the map. Also why I sort of hate these and the '100 day' thing in general- geez, let's give it 6 months at least and then see what's what. I also just happen to like realclear because at least it puts all the polls together in one place and breaks the samples down and such- I couldn't find state breakdowns this time though. 60-63% across the board approval in this climate? Good! Cheers! Carry on.. :)

  • These are interesting stats, but I'd like to see some analysis of the numbers. What does it mean that Obama has retained such strong support in MN as compared to WI and IA? Is it a good thing? A bad thing? Do the state-by-state stats on the the economy shed any light on Obama's popularity stats? Stats are fun ... but analysis is better.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting