Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Pawlenty Approval Rating Sinks to Lowest Level Since October 2006

Bookmark and Share

Perhaps it is due to the Governor presiding over record spikes in unemployment statewide. Perhaps it is the Governor's stated opposition to the federal stimulus legislation that landed Minnesota billions of dollars. Or perhaps the Governor is losing his public relations battle with the DFL leadership in St. Paul over how to handle the state budget crisis.

Whatever the reason, the latest SurveyUSA poll now finds Tim Pawlenty's approval rating at its lowest level in nearly two and a half years.

The new SurveyUSA poll, conducted of 600 adults from February 20-22, 2009, measures Pawlenty's statewide support at 48 percent - the lowest out of nearly three-dozen polls conducted since a mid-October 2006 survey in the midst of Pawlenty's reelection battle with DFLer Mike Hatch. The new numbers are also the third lowest for the Governor out of 54 polls conducted since late Summer 2005. Forty-four percent of Minnesotans currently disapprove of the Governor's performance.

The Governor's approval rating dropped from 53 percent in SurveyUSA's January poll, while his disapproval rating increased three points from 41 percent.

While this is not good news for Pawlenty, he can take solace in the fact that the job approval ratings dropped for governors in 11 of the 14 states SurveyUSA tracks, including by much larger margins for Democrats Chet Culver of Iowa and Jim Doyle of Wisconsin.

Pawlenty's approval rating is still higher than Culver's (46 percent) and Doyle's (40 percent), and the Gopher State Governor only endured an 8-point net approval drop from January. Culver suffered a 13-point net approval drop and Doyle a 17-point decline.

Other governors across the nation faced an even greater backlash from their constituencies during the last four tumultuous weeks, such as Democrats Jay Nixon of Missouri (21-point net approval drop), Deval Patrick of Massachusetts (44-point net decline), and David Paterson of New York (a staggering 51-point drop).

And there is some more good news for Pawlenty: he is still getting warm reviews from nearly twice as many Democrats statewide (28 percent) as he is getting negative notices from Republicans (15 percent) - an important statistic, considering Democrats hold a significant party ID edge over the GOP statewide (measured at 8 points in the new SurveyUSA poll).

Pawlenty enjoys the 5th highest approval rating of the 14 governors surveyed - 11 of which are Democrats.

Change in Gubernatorial Job Approval Rating, January-February 2009

State
Governor
Jan. 09
Feb. 09
Approval Change
Net Approval Change
AL
Bob Riley
60
64
+4
+8
VA
Tim Kaine
54
57
+3
+3
KS
Kathleen Sebelius
57
56
-1
-3
MO
Jay Nixon
63
55
-8
-21
MN
Tim Pawlenty
53
48
-5
-8
KY
Steve Beshear
48
48
0
-1
IA
Chet Culver
50
46
-4
-13
NM
Bill Richardson
47
41
-6
-9
WI
Jim Doyle
48
40
-8
-17
WA
Christine Gregoire
42
38
-4
-8
OR
Ted Kulongoski
42
38
-4
-7
NY
David Paterson
54
30
-24
-51
MA
Deval Patrick
49
28
-21
-44
CA
Arnold Schwarzenegger
28
25
-3
-6
Ave.
 
49.6
43.9
-5.8
-12.6
Note: SurveyUSA polling data compiled by Smart Politics.



Previous post: Why (the DFL Thinks) Pawlenty Does Not Want A Structurally Balanced Budget
Next post: Minnesota Ranks 4th in the Nation in Electing Women to State Legislatures

1 Comment


  • Has the Governor ever achieved the mythical 50% of the popular vote in his elections as Governor?

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting