Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Upper Midwest House Members Vote 18-5 in Favor of TARP Bailout Bonus Tax

Bookmark and Share

On Thursday, Upper Midwestern U.S. House Democrats unanimously supported a bill that would impose an additional tax on bonuses received from certain Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) recipients. The measured passed 328 to 93 in the lower chamber.

The bill (HR 1586) taxes at 90 percent bonuses given to employees of bailed out companies, such as AIG, who have family incomes of $250,000 or more.

All 15 Democrats from Iowa (Leonard Boswell, Bruce Braley, Dave Loebsack), Minnesota (Keith Ellison, Betty McCollum, Jim Oberstar, Collin Peterson, Tim Walz), North Dakota (Earl Pomeroy), South Dakota (Stephanie Herseth Sandlin), and Wisconsin (Tammy Baldwin, Steve Kagen, Ron Kind, Gwen Moore, David Obey) voted in favor of the measure.

The Republican side of the aisle, however, was split - with only the Minnesota delegation (Michele Bachmann, John Klein, Erik Paulsen) unanimously opposed to the measure. They were joined by Iowa GOPer Steve King and Wisconsin Republican James Sensenbrenner. Three Republicans voted with the Democrats - Iowa's Tom Latham and Wisconsin's Tom Petri and Paul Ryan.

Bachmann expressed her firm opposition to the tax:

"Folks, two wrongs don't make a right. Without the wrong-headed $700-billion bailout, the taxpayers would never have been put in the position of their dollars being doled out for executive bonuses in the first place... The bill on the House floor today, while not mentioning AIG by name, is clearly meant to punish a specific group of individuals in response to public outrage over the bonuses. The author of the bill, Rep. Rangel, explains his motivation for the bill by saying that he "had an obligation to respond to the fears and anger of the people." Given this motivation, a legislative action aimed at punishing individuals, no matter how loathed or despised they may be, is explicitly prohibited by the Constitution in Article I, Section 9, Clause 3."

Wisconsin's Rep. Sensenbreener also maintained the bill is unconstitutional and took a swipe at Democrats in the process:

"While this bill may give political cover to those who voted for the stimulus bill which approved the AIG bonuses, it is the wrong way to go about recovering the taxpayers money and ultimately, it will not work. This legislation was put forth by the Democrats to cover up the fact that they are the ones who inserted the provision into the stimulus bill that authorized the payment of these bonuses to AIG and then called for a vote before anyone could read the 1,000 page bill. It is only a matter of time before this bill is declared unconstitutional and overturned by the courts."

Overall, 243 of 249 Democrats voted for the tax increase (97.5 percent), compared to 85 of 172 Republicans (49.4 percent).

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Jobless Claims Rate of Increase Slowed Across Upper Midwest in February
Next post: Beyond the War of Words At the Capitol: What's Next?

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Kevin McCarthy Becomes Least Tenured Floor Leader in US House History

At less than four terms, McCarthy has served 423 fewer days in the chamber than any floor leader in U.S. House history and almost 10 years less than the average leader.

Political Crumbs

The Second Time Around

Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


How Are the Plurality Winners Doing?

Nearly 40 percent of plurality winners of U.S. Senate elections lose their seat in the next election cycle. Will that happen to any of the three such incumbents on the ballot in 2014? Recent polling suggests Democrats Al Franken of Minnesota, Mark Begich of Alaska, and Jeff Merkley of Oregon all currently have an advantage over their nominated/frontrunning GOP opponents, but each is flirting with plurality support once again. Franken led endorsed GOPer Mike McFadden 48 to 42 percent in a new SurveyUSA poll while the polling group showed Merkley with a 50 to 32 percent advantage over Monica Wehby. Begich led each of the three major GOP candidates in last month's PPP survey: 42 to 37 percent over Daniel Sullivan, 41 to 33 percent over Mead Treadwell, and 43 to 27 percent over Joe Miller.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting