Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Why (the DFL Thinks) Pawlenty Does Not Want A Structurally Balanced Budget

Bookmark and Share

One of the frequent refrains heard throughout the DFL leadership this session has been a criticism of Governor Tim Pawlenty's budget as failing to be structurally balanced beyond the 2010-2011 fiscal years, and a disapproval of the Governor's use of one-term solutions, such as tobacco bonds, to facilitate the State's constitutional requirements to balance the budget by May 18th.

On MPR Wednesday morning, Minnesota House Speaker Margaret Anderson Kelliher said four years out, in FY 2012-2013, the budget deficit is projected to be at over $6 billion:

"There is an underlying problem in the structure of our budget...And the fact of the matter is the Governor's comfortable kicking the can down the road and passing it along to another day."

In a press release on Tuesday afternoon, the Senate DFL caucus accused Pawlenty of "Using federal funds to hide the real problem," and made a vague reference to the Governor in its warning that, "This is no time for political aspirations to be ahead of the needs of the public." (emphasis added)

The DFL has also made frequent reference for the need to have "All the options on the table"; Speaker Anderson Kelliher chooses to use the analogy of the legislature needing, "All the trays in the toolbox," and calls Pawlenty's vow of no tax increases, "Sabre rattling."

These 'options' and 'tools' that the DFL wants to use, but does not want to always address by name are, of course, tax increases on Minnesotans. The Speaker prefers the term, "Fairer revenue raise."

All the while the Governor remains a model of consistency, pledging again on Tuesday that he would oppose any tax increases for Minnesotans and Minnesota businesses.

Even party loyalist GOP House Minority Leader Marty Seifert, however, has concerns about the Governor's budget proposal. On MPR Wednesday morning he stated:

"I don't disagree with the Speaker that the securitization of the tobacco bonds are a revenue source. The one thing we have to be careful about is it's a one-time pot and if the Governor's budget structurally changes 30 percent of spending and on a one-time basis 70 percent - I'm concerned about that. I'm just going to be honest with you about that. I don't mean to criticize him - he does have a solution out there, and I want to thank him for the solution...(but) It's got to be a little heavier on the long-term structure because we'll be back in the soup again in 2011...We have to have more structural reforms."

At Tuesday's media availability, when asked whether or not he would be able to solve the budget imbalance for not only this biennium, but also the 2012-13 biennium, without increasing the revenue that comes into the State, Pawlenty elected to punt for one of the few times all morning:

"We're going to have a balanced budget that meets the constitutional requirements of the State of Minnesota."

The lines connecting the dots here are short and straight.

Pawlenty's non-answer answer regarding the 2012-13 budget, taken together with the Senate DFL's reference to Pawlenty's 'political aspirations' fuels the DFL's speculation that:

1) The Governor is purposefully leaving the budget unstructured.

2) The Governor is leaving the budget unstructured, because he knows the only way to resolve the $6 billion 2012-13 deficit is to institute tax increases today.

3) The Governor is willing to "kick the can down the road" because he does not want to break his "no tax increase" pledge.

4) The Governor does not want to deviate from this "no tax increase" mantra because he wants to leave open the possibility of running for President in 2012.

5) Should the Governor sign off on tax increases (and focus on what the DFL believes to be the long-term financial health of the State), his potential Republican presidential primary rivals could use any such tax hike as a weapon against him in the presidential primaries. As of today, he could enter the 2012 GOP field with fairly clean, conservative hands.

As such, the Governor is continuing to hammer away at non-tax raising solutions to make the budget as structurally sound as possible - such as through more spending cuts and governmental pay freezes (including the politically shrewd move of reducing his own salary as Governor).

Of course, the Governor could take an arrow out of the DFL's quiver by announcing his intention to run for Governor in 2010 - if that is indeed his intention. The announcement of his 2010 plans are expected sometime in the next 10 months, though the odds are not high that the Governor will do so until after this legislative session is completed.

Previous post: Minnesotans' Approval of Obama Holds Steady As Support Wanes Nationwide
Next post: Pawlenty Approval Rating Sinks to Lowest Level Since October 2006

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Kevin McCarthy Becomes Least Tenured Floor Leader in US House History

At less than four terms, McCarthy has served 423 fewer days in the chamber than any floor leader in U.S. House history and almost 10 years less than the average leader.

Political Crumbs

The Second Time Around

Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


How Are the Plurality Winners Doing?

Nearly 40 percent of plurality winners of U.S. Senate elections lose their seat in the next election cycle. Will that happen to any of the three such incumbents on the ballot in 2014? Recent polling suggests Democrats Al Franken of Minnesota, Mark Begich of Alaska, and Jeff Merkley of Oregon all currently have an advantage over their nominated/frontrunning GOP opponents, but each is flirting with plurality support once again. Franken led endorsed GOPer Mike McFadden 48 to 42 percent in a new SurveyUSA poll while the polling group showed Merkley with a 50 to 32 percent advantage over Monica Wehby. Begich led each of the three major GOP candidates in last month's PPP survey: 42 to 37 percent over Daniel Sullivan, 41 to 33 percent over Mead Treadwell, and 43 to 27 percent over Joe Miller.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting