Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Obama Approval Rating Holding Steady in Minnesota and Blue States, Still Dropping in Red States

Bookmark and Share

Barack Obama's latest approval rating in Minnesota remains in the low 60s - holding essentially, and impressively, flat for the third consecutive month, according to the latest round of polling by SurveyUSA.

For the month of April, in a survey of 600 adults statewide, 63 percent of Minnesotans approve of the job Obama is doing as President - compared to 61 percent in March and 62 percent in February. Only 33 percent disapprove of Obama's job performance. The poll has a margin of error of +/- 3.9 percent.

Minnesotans appear to be mirroring what is a nationwide trend, at least among the 14 states tracked each month by SurveyUSA. Obama started with very high marks in both red and blue states after Inauguration Day, only to see his marks fall across all states in February after controversial economic stimulus legislation was passed in D.C.

But in the states polled by SurveyUSA that Obama carried last November (California, Iowa, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin), his collective approval rating has remained virtually flat for the last three months - 62.2 percent in February, 61.8 percent in March, and 62.7 percent in April.

Obama's disapproval rating has also remained essentially unchanged during this span among these 10 states: 32.8 percent in February, 32.6 percent in March, and 32.5 percent in April.

However, in the states polled by SurveyUSA that Obama failed to carry in 2008 (Alabama, Kansas, Kentucky, and Missouri), Obama's aggregate approval rating has dropped from 62.3 percent in January to 53.8 percent in March, to 50.3 percent in April. Perhaps more telling, his disapproval rating has increased from 23.5 percent in January to 40.5 percent in February, to 41.0 percent in March to 45.0 percent in April in these four more conservative states. In short, the honeymoon period appears to be about over for Obama in McCain Country.

As a result, the net "blue state" versus "red state" difference in Obama's approval rating has increased from 7.7 points in January to 12.5 points in April. (This includes, admittedly, a few purple states tracked by SurveyUSA; for the purpose of this post, "blue state" is shorthand for those states carried by Obama, and "red state" is shorthand for those won by Republican John McCain).

The net difference in disapproval rating between Obama and McCain states has also increased each month, from 5.7 points in January to 12.5 points in April.

Presidential Disapproval Rating in McCain States vs. Obama States

Month
McCain states
Obama states
Difference
Jan 2009
23.5
17.8
5.7
Feb 2009
40.5
32.8
7.7
Mar 2009
41.0
32.6
8.4
Apr 2009
45.0
32.5
12.5
Note: SurveyUSA polling data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Will Arlen Specter Win in 2010?
Next post: Why Governor Pawlenty Is Not in the 'Danger Zone'

3 Comments


  • I think Obama will make America on right way to make peace and freedom around the world.

  • Very nice article, i get much and valuable information from you. Thanks.

  • Only 592 days left in Obama's reign. I'm hoping for change already! :D

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Gender Equality in the US House: A State-by State Quarter-Century Report Card (1989-2014)

    A study of 5,325 congressional elections finds the number of female U.S. Representatives has more than tripled over the last 25 years, but the rate at which women are elected to the chamber still varies greatly between the states.

    Political Crumbs

    Final Four Has Presidential Approval

    By edging Michigan in the final seconds Sunday, the University of Kentucky guaranteed that one school in the Final Four this year would be located in a state that was not carried by President Barack Obama in 2012. (Connecticut, Florida, and Wisconsin had previously earned Final Four slots over the weekend). Across the 76 Final Fours since 1939, an average of 3.1 schools have been located in states won by the president's ticket during the previous election cycle. All four schools have come from states won by the president 29 times, with the most recent being the 2009 Final Four featuring Connecticut, Michigan State, North Carolina, and Villanova. On 30 occasions three Final Four schools have been located in states won by the president, with two schools 11 times and only one school six times (the most recent being 2012 with Kansas, Kentucky, Louisville, and Ohio State). There has never been a Men's NCAA Division I Final Four in which no schools were located in states carried by the president's ticket.


    Three for the Road

    A new Rasmussen Poll shows Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker in a dead heat with likely 2014 Democratic nominee Mary Burke. Walker is seeking to win his third consecutive election after prevailing in 2012's recall contest. Eight of his predecessors accomplished this feat: Republicans Lucius Fairchild (in 1869), Jeremiah Rusk (1886), Robert La Follette (1904), Emanuel Philipp (1918), John Blaine (1924), Walter Kohler (1954), Warren Knowles (1968), and Tommy Thompson (1994). Three others Badger State governors lost on their third campaign: Democrat George Peck (1894), Progressive Philip La Follette (1938), and Republican Julius Heil (1942). One died in office before having the opportunity to win a third contest (GOPer Walter Goodland in 1947) while another resigned beforehand (Democrat Patrick Lucey in 1977 to become Ambassador to Mexico). Overall Wisconsin gubernatorial incumbents have won 35 of 47 general election contests, or 74.5 percent of the time.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting