Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Political Luminaries Rally in Support of Ranked Choice Voting at FairVote Minnesota Fundraiser

Bookmark and Share

More than two hundred Minnesotans - from party leaders, to legislators, to mayors, to city council members, to interested citizens - rallied in support of ranked choice voting at a fundraising event held for FairVote Minnesota in Minneapolis Tuesday evening.

Ranked choice voting (aka instant runoff voting, or IRV) passed at the polls in 2006 in the City of Minneapolis by a 65 to 35 percent margin, and will be instituted in Minneapolis' 2009 November elections, joining seven other jurisdictions across the country, including San Francisco and Cambridge, Massachusetts.

The instant runoff voting system allows voters to rank candidates on the ballot according to their 1st choice, 2nd choice, and 3rd choice etc. FairVote Minnesota explains how the votes are then tallied:

"The voting begins by tallying first choices. In single-seat elections, if the leading candidate attains a majority of the votes, he or she wins...If no candidate garners a majority of the votes, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and the votes cast for this candidate are reallocated to the remaining candidates as indicated by the 2nd choice on each voters' ballot and the ballots are counted again. This process is repeated until one candidate receives a majority."

At the event, former Independence Party gubernatorial nominee Peter Hutchinson introduced several political leaders who attested to their support for the voting system, which FairVote is trying to get instituted in cities such as St. Paul and Duluth, as well as ultimate passage at the State Capitol in the coming years.

The Minnesota Supreme Court, however, will hear an appeal by Minnesota Voters Alliance on May 13th regarding the constitutionality of the measure. The group lost their lawsuit at the trial level against the City of Minneapolis and FairVote Minnesota, but maintains:

"IRV is undemocratic because it counts the secondary choices of some voters while counting only the first choice votes of others. It eliminates the primaries which play a vital role in the electoral process; It creates false majorities, suppresses minority viewpoints and its structure makes it susceptible to strategic manipulation."

At the fundraising event, DFL Party Chair Brian Melendez stated that ranked choice voting is part of his Party's platform; it has also been endorsed by the Independence Party of Minnesota, the Green Party of Minnesota, and the Libertarian Party of Minnesota.

Former U.S. Senator David Durenberger followed Melendez, and jokingly asked for more time to speak than the two minutes allotted because, he said, "I think I'm the only Republican here." Durenberger lamented at how the GOP used to be a "Big umbrella party...the umbrella kept getting bigger all the time. And someone came along and shrunk that umbrella." The Senator then endorsed ranked choice voting:

"On behalf of my kids, my grandkids, the people who voted for Barack Obama who said, 'It's time for a change in this country. Let's take back the governance of all our institutions, including our political institutions.' This is the only way I know to do it on the political side."

Other notables in attendance included Secretary of State Mark Ritchie, DFL Senator Ann Rest (SD 45-New Hope), DFL State Representatives Steve Simon (HD 44A-St. Louis Park) and Jeff Hayden (HD 61B-Minneapolis), Peter Wagenius (Senior Policy Aide to Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak), Minneapolis City Council Member Elizabeth Glidden, and 2008 6th CD DFL nominee Elwyn Tinklenberg.

Smart Politics asked Tinklenberg what he thought of ranked choice voting and how it would have impacted his 2008 race against Republican Michele Bachmann if it had been the law of the land. In that race, Independence Party candidate Bob Anderson received 10 percent of the vote, with Bachmann winning with a plurality of 46.4 percent over Tinklenberg's 43.4 percent. Many DFLers believe those Anderson votes would have gone to Tinklenberg had he not been on the ballot, although SurveyUSA polling conducted just prior to the election shows Anderson's support was split among partisans.

While the former State Transportation Commissioner did not explicitly endorse the ranked choice voting system outright, he did say "Something needs to be done." Tinklenberg stated he believed Anderson's candidacy, "Didn't contribute to the campaign of ideas" in the '08 race. He also attributed the votes Anderson received as a result of the general dissatisfaction among the electorate due to the length of the campaign as well as the independent streak that runs through the district. He interpreted votes for Anderson as a portion of the electorate saying, "A pox on all your houses."

I then asked Tinklenberg what he thought of the theory advanced at Smart Politics regarding the possibility his candidacy suffered not so much in the final days of the campaign from protest votes for Anderson but from a backlash by the 6th District against the national media's vocal criticism of Congresswoman Bachmann. "There's something to that," he said. The former Mayor of Blaine went on to say he was actually feeling much more comfortable with the direction of his campaign before Bachmann's infamous interview on Chris Matthews' Hardball program. In the end, though, Tinklenberg admitted, "We needed to earn the votes."

FairVote hopes those votes will eventually be cast and counted in an entirely different way in Minnesota's federal, state, and local elections in the coming years.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Minnesota 2nd Most Competitive State for U.S. Senate Elections Since 1990
Next post: South Dakota Unemployment Rate Reaches 23+ Year High

1 Comment


  • someone should remind Melendez that the ST. Paul DFL convention recently fell short of endorsing IRV. So, his claim that IRV is in his party's platform should have an asterisk by it, at least.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Strange Bedfellows: A Historical Review of Divided US Senate Delegations

    Over the last century, states have been twice as likely to be represented by a single political party in the U.S. Senate than have a split delegation; only Delaware, Iowa, and Illinois have been divided more than half the time.

    Political Crumbs

    Haugh to Reach New Heights

    The North Carolina U.S. Senate race between Democratic incumbent Kay Hagan and Republican Thom Tillis may go down to the wire next Tuesday, but along the way Libertarian nominee Sean Haugh is poised to set a state record for a non-major party candidate. Haugh, who previously won 1.5 percent of the vote in the Tar Heel State's 2002 race, has polled at or above five percent in 10 of the last 12 polls that included his name. The current high water mark for a third party or independent candidate in a North Carolina U.S. Senate election is just 3.3 percent, recorded by Libertarian Robert Emory back in 1992. Only one other candidate has eclipsed the three percent mark - Libertarian Christopher Cole with 3.1 percent in 2008.


    Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

    Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting