Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Will Minnesotans Support the Firearms Freedom Act?

Bookmark and Share

Minnesota Republican State Representative Tom Emmer (19B-Delano) introduced legislation in the House on Thursday that seeks to restrict the reach of federal firearms laws by exempting Minnesota-made firearms and ammunition that remain in the state from federal laws and regulations, including registration.

In a statement released by the House GOP Caucus Communications Office, Emmer said:

“The federal government shouldn’t be keeping track of citizens that are lawfully exercising their Second Amendment rights. Now, more than ever, citizens need be vigilant when it comes to protecting their individual liberties.

While it is not clear from Rep. Emmer’s statement as to why he believes citizens need to be protecting their 2nd Amendment liberties “now, more than ever,” it is true that a large percentage of Minnesotans own guns – 1 in 2, in fact, according to several public opinion polls conducted over the past three years.

A Smart Politics analysis of 21 SurveyUSA polls conducted from October 2006 through February 2009 finds approximately 49 percent of Minnesota adults own at least one firearm. That number is about on par with the gun ownership rate in the neighboring states of Iowa (47 percent) and Wisconsin (50 percent).

Emmer’s legislation would eliminate the requirement to register any personal firearms and ammunition manufactured and remaining in the Gopher State. Gun control advocates maintain strict registration requirements are one element in an ongoing effort to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and people safe from gun violence. Those opposing stricter firearms laws maintain such legislation has the net effect of insuring only criminals have guns, leaving residents more vulnerable to violent firearm attacks.

Minnesotans have been historically divided over the general need to make gun control laws more strict in the state, although a much larger percentage of residents seem to be in favor of tightening the laws as opposed to loosening them (a substantial percentage of residents believe the laws are fine just as they are).

For example, a July 2004 Humphrey Institute poll found 44 percent of Gopher State residents wanted gun control laws to be more strict, with 44 percent wanting them kept as is, and 10 percent wanting them less strict. Similar result were measured in July 2004 Humphrey Institute polls of Iowans (41 percent more strict, 41 percent the same, 14 percent less strict), and Wisconsinites (39 percent more strict, 48 percent the same, 10 percent less strict).

Back in September 2003, Star Tribune polling found a majority of Minnesotans believed proposed handgun carry permits would make the state a more dangerous place to live (51 percent), with just 11 percent believing it would make the state safer.

The truth is, however, that the Upper Midwest has some of the lowest gun homicide rates in the country. According to a Smart Politics analysis of 2005 Bureau of Justice statistics, Minnesota has the the 14th lowest such per capita rate, at just 1.43 gun homicides per 100,000 residents. Minnesota’s rate is lower than that of Wisconsin (#20, 2.38 gun homicides), but higher than North Dakota (#1, 0.16 homicides), Iowa (#6, 0.71 homicides), and South Dakota (#9, 0.99 homicides).

Lowest Per Capita Gun Homicide Rates by State, 2005

Rank
State
Rate per 100,000 residents
1
North Dakota
0.16
2
Hawaii
0.19
3
New Hampshire
0.52
4
Maine
0.53
5
Montana
0.57
6
Iowa
0.71
7
Vermont
0.81
8
Nebraska
0.97
9
South Dakota
0.99
10
Utah
1.10
11
Oregon
1.34
12
Wyoming
1.38
13
Connecticut
1.41
14
Minnesota
1.43
15
Massachusetts
1.50
15
Rhode Island
1.50
17
Idaho
1.66
18
Washington
2.02
19
Kansas
2.03
20
Colorado
2.38
20
Wisconsin
2.38
22
West Virginia
2.47
23
New York
2.60
24
Delaware
2.74
25
Alaska
2.84
26
Ohio
2.93
27
Florida*
3.09
28
New Jersey
3.19
29
Kentucky
3.20
30
Oklahoma
3.66
31
New Mexico
3.71
32
Indiana
4.11
33
Texas
4.14
34
Michigan
4.19
35
North Carolina
4.21
36
Virginia
4.25
37
Pennsylvania
4.40
38
Georgia
4.45
39
Illinois
4.56
40
Arkansas
4.59
41
Missouri
4.87
42
Tennessee
5.09
43
Mississippi
5.14
43
South Carolina
5.14
45
California
5.15
46
Nevada
5.16
47
Alabama
5.64
48
Arizona
5.68
49
Maryland
7.51
50
Louisiana
7.75
Note: Data compiled by Smart Politics from the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, and U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Population Estimate for July 1, 2005. Florida gun homicide rate based on 2004 homicide data.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: How Many Senators Will Vote for the Next Supreme Court Nominee?
Next post: Pawlenty Delivers on Veto Pledge; Override Season Opens

5 Comments


  • Er... Kinda points out "more guns, less crime" as a truism then.

    I like Rep. Emmer's bill. It could bring more industry to MN and we need that BADLY after chasing out larger companies like 3M with our idiotic tax schemes.

  • Um, has anyone pointed out to Rep. Emmer that his grandstanding bill would likely increase regulatory costs and record-keeping requirements for sellers? At least criminals could buy Minnesota-made guns and ammo and help the economy.

  • No matter what the bill says, it is really about state's rights. It is about enforcing the United States Constitution, about limiting the Federal Government to the role that the Constitution grants it. It is to protect each American citizen's liberties as established in the Constitution.

  • Bill, You couldn't be more right. It's not so much about gun owners. There are already gun owners in Minnesota. The difference is that as a gun owner you would be regulated under state law instead of federal regulation. But it doesn't end here. It would encompass virtually all federal regulation and law from abortion issues to gay rights and on and on. Instead of the fed regulating us we would be regulated locally under state regulation. Let's face it, fed is getting to out of touch with us, but state regulation brings it home and a bit more personal. Don't you feel like your voice is louder in St. Paul rather than D.C.? This is a huge step in reducing the size and scope and power of the federal government. We need to rally around this movement and follow this through. This is a great opportunity for us to bring government back to the people. Stay informed and educate your friends.

  • I think the main point of this bill is to effectively void any future assault weapons ban.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting