Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Who Defected on the US House Climate Change Legislation?

Bookmark and Share

The U.S. House of Representative's 219-212 vote last week in favor of the American Clean Energy and Security Act (HR 2454) passed in part due to the defection of a handful of Republicans, while more than half of the Blue Dog Democratic coalition voted in opposition to the bill.

Eight Republicans in total voted for the climate change legislation - seven of which hail from districts carried by Barack Obama in the 2008 presidential race, by an average of 11.7 points.

GOP Defectors in Support of Climate Change Bill HR 2454

District
Representative
CD MoV
Pres. MoV
CA-45
Mary Bono Mack
14.8
5 (Obama)
DE-AL
Michael Castle
23.1
25 (Obama)
IL-10
Mark Kirk
9.0
23 (Obama)
NJ-02
Frank LoBiondo
20.2
9 (Obama)
NJ-04
Chris Smith
33.9
5 (McCain)
NJ-07
Leonard Lance
9.2
1 (Obama)
NY-23
John McHugh
30.6
5 (Obama)
WA-08
David Reichert
5.6
14 (Obama)

Forty-four Democrats voted against the measure (along with 168 Republicans), including 29 Blue Dog Democrats. Among those Blue Dogs voting 'no' were At-large Representatives Stephanie Herseth Sandlin from South Dakota and Earl Pomeroy from North Dakota.

While a majority of the Blue Dogs voted against the legislation, 23 representatives in the 52-member coalition supported it, including Minnesota's Collin Peterson (MN-07) and Iowa's Leonard Boswell (IA-03). The entire Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin congressional delegations voted along party lines.

Nearly twice as many Democrats who voted against the climate change bill represent districts carried by John McCain in 2008 presidential election (29) than those who represent districts carried by Obama (15). McCain carried these 29 districts by an average of 15.3 points.

Seven of the Democratic defectors won pick-up seats in the 2008 Election, and five of these are also Blue Dogs - Bobby Bright (AL-02), Ann Kirkpatrick (AZ-01), Walt Minnick (ID-01), Kathy Dahlkemper (PA-03), and Glenn Nye (VA-02).

Some Democratic opposition to the climate change legislation did come from the more liberal wing of the Party in the House, such as Peter Visclosky (IN-01) and Dennis Kucinich (OH-10). Kucinich argued that the bill did not go far enough - setting weak targets, giving record subsidies to the coal industry, and building an overarching framework for failure.

Democratic Defectors in Opposition to Climate Change Bill HR 2454

District
Representative
Blue Dog
CD MoV
Pres. MoV
AL-02
Bobby Bright
Yes
0.6
26 (McCain)
AL-05
Parker Griffith
Yes
3.0
23 (McCain)
AL-07
Artur Davis
 
100.0
42 (Obama)
AR-01
Marion Berry
Yes
100.0
21 (McCain)
AR-04
Mike Ross
Yes
72.6
19 (McCain)
AZ-01
Ann Kirkpatrick
 
16.2
10 (McCain)
AZ-05
Harry Mitchell
Yes
9.6
5 (McCain)
CA-13
Pete Stark
 
52.6
51 (Obama)
CA-20
Jim Costa
Yes
48.0
21 (Obama)
CO-03
John Salazar
Yes
22.8
2 (McCain)
GA-08
Jim Marshall
Yes
14.4
13 (McCain)
GA-12
John Barrow
Yes
32.0
9 (Obama)
ID-01
Walt Minnick
Yes
1.6
26 (McCain)
IL-12
Jerry Costello
 
46.9
13 (Obama)
IL-14
Bill Foster
 
14.8
11 (Obama)
IN-01
Peter Visclosky
 
43.7
25 (Obama)
IN-02
Joe Donnelly
Yes
36.9
9 (Obama)
IN-08
Brad Ellsworth
Yes
30.6
4 (McCain)
LA-03
Charlie Melancon
Yes
100.0
24 (McCain)
MS-01
Travis Childers
Yes
10.4
25 (McCain)
MS-04
Gene Taylor
Yes
49.2
35 (McCain)
NC-07
Mike McIntyre
Yes
37.6
5 (McCain)
NC-08
Larry Kissell
 
10.8
5 (Obama)
ND-AL
Earl Pomeroy
Yes
24.0
8 (McCain)
NY-24
Michael Arcuri
Yes
2.8
2 (Obama)
NY-29
Eric Massa
 
1.8
2 (McCain)
OH-06
Charles Wilson
Yes
29.5
2 (McCain)
OH-10
Dennis Kucinich
 
17.4
20 (Obama)
OK-02
Dan Boren
Yes
41.0
32 (McCain)
OR-04
Peter DeFazio
 
69.4
11 (Obama)
PA-03
Kathy Dahlkemper
Yes
3.0
0 (McCain)
PA-04
Jason Altmire
Yes
12.0
11 (McCain)
PA-10
Christopher Carney
Yes
12.8
9 (McCain)
PA-17
Tim Holden
Yes
27.6
3 (McCain)
SD-AL
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin
Yes
35.2
8 (McCain)
TN-04
Lincoln Davis
Yes
21.0
30 (McCain)
TN-08
John Tanner
Yes
100.0
13 (McCain)
TX-17
Chet Edwards
 
3.1
35 (McCain)
TX-23
Ciro Rodriguez
 
13.9
3 (Obama)
TX-27
Solomon Ortiz
 
19.5
7 (Obama)
UT-02
Jim Matheson
Yes
28.4
18 (McCain)
VA-02
Glenn Nye
Yes
4.9
2 (Obama)
WV-01
Alan Mollohan
 
100.0
11 (McCain)
WV-03
Nick Rahall
 
34.0
14 (McCain)

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Wisconsin Overtakes Minnesota as #1 State in Health Care Quality Rankings
Next post: Norm Coleman Ends 2008 Election Legal Fight

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting