Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Why Doesn't Amy Klobuchar Run for Governor?

Bookmark and Share

Despite overwhelming success in federal and state elections during the past few decades, the DFL may have missed its best chances (in 1998, 2006) to win a gubernatorial election in the Gopher State.

Excluding gubernatorial contests, the DFL has won 72 percent of statewide elections (21 of 29) since the Election of 1986, when the DFL last won a governor's race with Rudy Perpich. During that span, the DFL has also won 66 percent of US House races (58 of 88), 62 percent of state Senate contests (261 of 424), and 54 percent of state House races (813 of 1,502).

With Republican Governor Tim Pawlenty's announcement that he would not seek a third term, the floodgates have opened for both former and current city (R.T. Rybak, Chris Coleman), county (Susan Gaertner), state (Tom Bakk, Matt Entenza, John Marty, Margaret Anderson Kelliher, Paul Thissen, Marty Siefert, Laura Brod, Bill Hass, David Hann, Paul Koering, Paul Kohls), and federal (Mark Dayton) DFL and GOP officeholders to explore or outright announce their gubernatorial candidacies.

But there is one officeholder who would certainly "clear the field" of candidates on the DFL side of the ticket, and that is U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar. Although Norm Coleman's name has been (all too casually) tossed about as a potential GOP candidate, there have been few public efforts to "recruit Amy" by DFLers.

Statewide, Klobuchar is the most popular DFL officeholder the party has produced in decades. The Senator's approval rating is one of the highest in the US Senate - and also one of the most consistent. A Smart Politics analysis of SurveyUSA data finds Klobuchar's approval rating has hovered between 58 and 63 percent in 21 straight polls dating back to July 2007.

During that span the approval ratings of some of her neighboring Senators have fluctuated wildly:

· This year Wisconsin senior Senator Herb Kohl saw his approval rating drop from 64 percent (in January) to 50 percent (in March) during the state's economic crisis.

· Wisconsin junior Senator Russ Feingold's approval rating dipped to as low as 48 percent in September 2008, before rebounding to 61 percent in January 2009, and then falling in May back to 53 percent.

· Iowa senior Senator Charles Grassley has seen his 71 percent approval rating in February dip to 58 percent in May, due in part to some controversial comments.

· Iowa junior Senator Tom Harkin saw his 63 percent approval rating he received one month after getting elected in November 2008 drop to 51 percent in April 2009.

So, why doesn't Klobuchar make a run at what would appear to be a clear path to the Governor's mansion?

First of all, it is quite likely that Klobuchar (her double-duty constituency caseload aside) enjoys her work at the nation's Capitol. The Senator has smartly not used her 2006 landslide victory to pursue an extremely liberal agenda, which has perhaps contributed to her sustained appeal among moderates and liberal Republicans (National Journal rated Klobuchar as the 37th most liberal and 60th most conservative Senator in 2008).

Secondly, it might seem a bit politically unseemly for Klobuchar to run for governor without having first completed the 6-year term to which she was elected. At the moment, given the unresolved 2008 U.S. Senate contest, Klobuchar is also in many ways 'trapped' in her D.C. job. To announce her candidacy for governor at a time when the Gopher State needs her the most in Washington (having only one Senator on the payroll), would not be politically prudent.

The problem for Klobuchar, should she ever have such ambitions to run for governor, is that the election for her U.S. Senate seat does not coincide with a gubernatorial election until 2018.

The general rule of thumb is that most politicians want to join the most exclusive club to which they can receive membership. This is why Vice-President Joe Biden (1 of 1) and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (1 of 15) chose to become members of President Barack Obama's Cabinet rather than remain in the Senate (1 of 100). The Governor's Club (1 of 50), while not as exclusive, is still twice as exclusive as being a U.S. Senator.

And while Klobuchar has already achieved one previously unprecented accomplishment in the Gopher State - the first female elected U.S. Senator - it is not unfathomable that she has also thought about another first: becoming MInnesota's first female governor (let alone the first major party female gubernatorial candidate).

But for now, and perhaps for quite some time, all is quiet on the eastern front, and "RecruitAmy.com" domain names remain readily available.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Is New GOP House Minority Leader Kurt Zellers Politically Vulnerable?
Next post: Wisconsin Overtakes Minnesota as #1 State in Health Care Quality Rankings

3 Comments


  • There will only be a hand full of "contenders" that will be able to raise the kind of cash that the next gubernatorial race will require. That fact alone should eliminate most of the current field. As we can see with the current field of contenders, theirs is a quiet campaign for the donor.

    The Senator is and will be remembered as one of the most popular politicians in the state. Senator Klobuchar is someone whose popularity at home clearly points toward some kind of special political acumen.

    I believe that her horizon is limitless. Having said that I see no reason for her to come about and return back to MN politics. Her future is in front of her and the wind is at her back.

  • Why do you assume that a politician who has sought a legislative role would have any interest in an administrative role? Maybe she is a Senator because she wants to be one and that is where she believes her passion and talent can best be used. Your exclusivity argument is weak at best. Maybe Klobuchar someday wants to be Governor. But to assume she would want to based merely on a mathematical exclusivity formula paints a sad and gloomy image of politicians.

  • Great post. YOu make it seem so easy to share your experiences. I wish I could do as well in sharing on my blog. I just got it started and sometimes feel stuck on what to share or if it is the right thing to share. what to do?

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting