Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Wisconsin Overtakes Minnesota as #1 State in Health Care Quality Rankings

Bookmark and Share

The newly released 2008 state rankings by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service's Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ) finds the State of Wisconsin has passed Minnesota for overall health care quality in the United States.

Minnesota, ranked #2 in 2008, was the top state in the country in 2007. Wisconsin had also been #1 in 2006.

The rankings are based on data cultivated from 30+ sources, such as government surveys, health care facilities, and health care organizations.

AHRQ examines health care quality measures across three large dimensions:

1) Type of care (preventive, acute, and chronic care),
2) Setting of care (hospitals, ambulatory, nursing homes, and home health care)
3) Clinical areas (cancer, diabetes, heart disease, maternal and child health, and respiratory disease).

Overall, the Upper Midwestern states boasted some of the best scores in the country with all of Minnesota's neighboring states landing in the Top 10: Wisconsin at #1, Minnesota at #2, North Dakota at #8, South Dakota at #9, and Iowa at #10.

However, aside from Wisconsin, all of the other Upper Midwestern states slipped in the rankings from the previous year:

· Minnesota fell from #1 to #2
· North Dakota fell from #3 to #8
· Iowa fell from #4 to #10
· South Dakota fell from #7 to #9

Minnesota received a "strong" rating in the areas of preventative care, acute care, hospital care, nursing home care, ambulatory care, and in the clinical areas of cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and respiratory diseases. Performance is based on a relative scale in comparison to all states reporting such data.

The Gopher State only received an "average" ranking in chronic care and maternal and child health measures, and was considered "very weak" in the area of home health care (again, vis-à-vis the other 50 states and the District of Columbia).

The State of New York enjoyed the biggest jump in the rankings, improving from 42nd in 2007 to 28th in 2008 - a 14-state bump. Georgia (+10, 50th to 40th), Missouri (+9, 34th to 25th), Virginia (+7, 28th to 21st), and Massachusetts (+7, 10th to 3rd) also had notable improvements.

Wyoming, on the other side of the coin, saw their state ranking fall 16 slots, from 19th to 35th among the states. New Mexico (-11, 36th to 47th), Utah (-7, 11th to 18th) and Indiana (-7, 35th to 42nd) also endured a significant downgrading of their health care systems relative to the rest of the country.

AHRQ Health Care Quality Rankings by State, 2008

2008 Rank
2007 Rank
State
2008
2007
Change
1
2
WI
69.20
66.04
3.16
2
1
MN
65.38
66.96
-1.58
3
10
MA
63.91
60.65
3.26
4
9
NH
63.51
60.75
2.76
5
6
MI
63.18
61.47
1.71
6
8
RI
62.50
61.21
1.29
7
5
NE
61.84
62.26
-0.42
8
3
ND
61.36
64.02
-2.66
9
7
SD
59.77
61.39
-1.62
10
4
IA
59.57
62.39
-2.82
11
16
NJ
58.75
56.70
2.05
12
14
ME
58.24
57.83
0.41
13
13
CT
58.04
58.06
-0.02
14
15
VT
57.77
57.62
0.15
15
12
MT
55.98
58.13
-2.15
16
18
CO
55.51
55.79
-0.28
17
17
HI
52.23
56.52
-4.29
18
11
UT
52.23
59.72
-7.49
19
20
DE
52.20
53.70
-1.50
20
23
WA
52.16
50.43
1.73
21
28
VA
49.47
46.25
3.22
22
21
AK
49.38
50.68
-1.30
23
24
CA
48.74
50.00
-1.26
24
22
ID
48.33
50.61
-2.28
25
34
MO
48.31
41.81
6.50
26
30
NC
47.90
44.64
3.26
27
27
PA
47.85
46.28
1.57
28
42
NY
47.06
38.84
8.22
29
31
SC
46.93
43.93
3.00
30
26
OR
46.58
49.07
-2.49
31
25
KS
44.30
50.00
-5.70
32
33
WV
43.28
41.96
1.32
33
29
AZ
43.22
46.05
-2.83
34
40
AL
42.55
40.12
2.43
35
19
WY
42.17
53.85
-11.68
36
32
MD
40.99
42.11
-1.12
37
38
OH
40.78
40.48
0.30
38
37
IL
39.64
40.74
-1.10
39
41
FL
38.56
38.93
-0.37
40
50
GA
38.24
27.36
10.88
41
39
OK
38.03
40.23
-2.20
42
35
IN
37.98
40.82
-2.84
43
46
TN
36.44
34.84
1.60
44
45
TX
36.36
35.10
1.26
45
47
DC
35.62
33.33
2.29
46
43
KY
35.47
36.36
-0.89
47
36
NM
35.00
40.76
-5.76
48
49
AR
34.87
27.98
6.89
49
44
NV
33.61
35.53
-1.92
50
48
MS
30.00
29.63
0.37
51
51
LA
26.06
18.97
7.09
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Service's Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Why Doesn't Amy Klobuchar Run for Governor?
Next post: Who Defected on the US House Climate Change Legislation?

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Which States Have the Longest and Shortest Election Day Voting Hours?

Residents in some North Dakota towns have less than half as many hours to cast their ballots as those in New York State.

Political Crumbs

No 100-Year Curse for Roberts

Defeating his Tea Party primary challenger Milton Wolf with just 48.1 percent of the vote, Pat Roberts narrowly escaped becoming the first elected U.S. Senator from Kansas to lose a renomination bid in 100 years. The last - and so far only - elected U.S. Senator to lose a Kansas primary was one-term Republican Joseph Bristow in 1914. Bristow was defeated by former U.S. Senator Charles Curtis who went on to win three terms before becoming Herbert Hoover's running mate in 1928. Only one other U.S. Senator from the Sunflower State has lost a primary since the passage of the 17th Amendment: Sheila Frahm in 1996. Frahm was appointed to fill Bob Dole's seat earlier that year and finished 13.2 points behind Sam Brownback in the three-candidate primary field. Overall, incumbent senators from Kansas have won 29 times against two defeats in the direct vote era. (Curtis also lost a primary in 1912 to Walter Stubbs, one year before the nation moved to direct elections).


The Second Time Around

Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting