Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Wisconsin Overtakes Minnesota as #1 State in Health Care Quality Rankings

Bookmark and Share

The newly released 2008 state rankings by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service's Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ) finds the State of Wisconsin has passed Minnesota for overall health care quality in the United States.

Minnesota, ranked #2 in 2008, was the top state in the country in 2007. Wisconsin had also been #1 in 2006.

The rankings are based on data cultivated from 30+ sources, such as government surveys, health care facilities, and health care organizations.

AHRQ examines health care quality measures across three large dimensions:

1) Type of care (preventive, acute, and chronic care),
2) Setting of care (hospitals, ambulatory, nursing homes, and home health care)
3) Clinical areas (cancer, diabetes, heart disease, maternal and child health, and respiratory disease).

Overall, the Upper Midwestern states boasted some of the best scores in the country with all of Minnesota's neighboring states landing in the Top 10: Wisconsin at #1, Minnesota at #2, North Dakota at #8, South Dakota at #9, and Iowa at #10.

However, aside from Wisconsin, all of the other Upper Midwestern states slipped in the rankings from the previous year:

· Minnesota fell from #1 to #2
· North Dakota fell from #3 to #8
· Iowa fell from #4 to #10
· South Dakota fell from #7 to #9

Minnesota received a "strong" rating in the areas of preventative care, acute care, hospital care, nursing home care, ambulatory care, and in the clinical areas of cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and respiratory diseases. Performance is based on a relative scale in comparison to all states reporting such data.

The Gopher State only received an "average" ranking in chronic care and maternal and child health measures, and was considered "very weak" in the area of home health care (again, vis-à-vis the other 50 states and the District of Columbia).

The State of New York enjoyed the biggest jump in the rankings, improving from 42nd in 2007 to 28th in 2008 - a 14-state bump. Georgia (+10, 50th to 40th), Missouri (+9, 34th to 25th), Virginia (+7, 28th to 21st), and Massachusetts (+7, 10th to 3rd) also had notable improvements.

Wyoming, on the other side of the coin, saw their state ranking fall 16 slots, from 19th to 35th among the states. New Mexico (-11, 36th to 47th), Utah (-7, 11th to 18th) and Indiana (-7, 35th to 42nd) also endured a significant downgrading of their health care systems relative to the rest of the country.

AHRQ Health Care Quality Rankings by State, 2008

2008 Rank
2007 Rank
State
2008
2007
Change
1
2
WI
69.20
66.04
3.16
2
1
MN
65.38
66.96
-1.58
3
10
MA
63.91
60.65
3.26
4
9
NH
63.51
60.75
2.76
5
6
MI
63.18
61.47
1.71
6
8
RI
62.50
61.21
1.29
7
5
NE
61.84
62.26
-0.42
8
3
ND
61.36
64.02
-2.66
9
7
SD
59.77
61.39
-1.62
10
4
IA
59.57
62.39
-2.82
11
16
NJ
58.75
56.70
2.05
12
14
ME
58.24
57.83
0.41
13
13
CT
58.04
58.06
-0.02
14
15
VT
57.77
57.62
0.15
15
12
MT
55.98
58.13
-2.15
16
18
CO
55.51
55.79
-0.28
17
17
HI
52.23
56.52
-4.29
18
11
UT
52.23
59.72
-7.49
19
20
DE
52.20
53.70
-1.50
20
23
WA
52.16
50.43
1.73
21
28
VA
49.47
46.25
3.22
22
21
AK
49.38
50.68
-1.30
23
24
CA
48.74
50.00
-1.26
24
22
ID
48.33
50.61
-2.28
25
34
MO
48.31
41.81
6.50
26
30
NC
47.90
44.64
3.26
27
27
PA
47.85
46.28
1.57
28
42
NY
47.06
38.84
8.22
29
31
SC
46.93
43.93
3.00
30
26
OR
46.58
49.07
-2.49
31
25
KS
44.30
50.00
-5.70
32
33
WV
43.28
41.96
1.32
33
29
AZ
43.22
46.05
-2.83
34
40
AL
42.55
40.12
2.43
35
19
WY
42.17
53.85
-11.68
36
32
MD
40.99
42.11
-1.12
37
38
OH
40.78
40.48
0.30
38
37
IL
39.64
40.74
-1.10
39
41
FL
38.56
38.93
-0.37
40
50
GA
38.24
27.36
10.88
41
39
OK
38.03
40.23
-2.20
42
35
IN
37.98
40.82
-2.84
43
46
TN
36.44
34.84
1.60
44
45
TX
36.36
35.10
1.26
45
47
DC
35.62
33.33
2.29
46
43
KY
35.47
36.36
-0.89
47
36
NM
35.00
40.76
-5.76
48
49
AR
34.87
27.98
6.89
49
44
NV
33.61
35.53
-1.92
50
48
MS
30.00
29.63
0.37
51
51
LA
26.06
18.97
7.09
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Service's Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Barrett vs. Walker II: A History of Wisconsin Gubernatorial Rematch Elections

Losing gubernatorial candidates have come back for rematches against victorious Republicans and beat them two times out of the six rematches in Wisconsin history.

Political Crumbs

Governor vs. Governor vs. Governor

The last election cycle saw five ex-governors attempt to win back their old jobs, with success stories in California (Jerry Brown), Iowa (Terry Branstad), and Oregon (John Kitzhaber). But in 1904, the State of Wisconsin saw three governors on the general election ballot: two-term Republican incumbent Robert La Follette, former two-term Democratic Governor William Peck (elected in 1890 and 1892), and former two-term Republican Governor Edward Scofield (elected in 1896 and 1898). La Follette - with Teddy Roosevelt at the top of the ticket winning the presidency - cruised to an 11.3-point victory over Peck with 50.5 percent of the vote. Scofield ran a distant fourth on the National Republican ticket with just 2.7 percent - also losing to Social Democrat William Arnold who received 5.5 percent, but beating Prohibition and Socialist Labor candidates.


A Vote for No One

More than 50,000 North Carolina residents who voted in the Tuesday's Republican presidential primary opted for 'no preference' on their ballot, or 5.2 percent. That marks the second highest percentage of those who have done so in the 40 years of the modern primary era, behind the 9.8 percent who indicated no preference during George H.W. Bush's rout over Pat Buchanan in the state twenty years ago in 1992. In 2008, 4.0 percent were likewise noncommittal, with 1.7 percent voting no preference in 2000, 3.8 percent in 1996, 1.0 percent in 1988, 2.7 percent in 1980, and 1.7 percent in 1976.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting