Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


SoS Ritchie and Rep. Emmer Share Thoughts on Minnesota Election Reform

Bookmark and Share

Last Friday four of Minnesota's prominent leaders on election reform convened at the Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs to discuss what work needs to be done for the Gopher State to improve on its nationally renowned election system.

Moderated by Lawrence Jacobs, Director of the Institute's Center for the Study of Politics and Governance, the event featured a spirited discussion between Secretary of State Mark Ritchie, DFL Senator Ann Rest, GOP Representative Tom Emmer, and Ramsey County Elections Manager Joe Mansky.

Ideas such as utilizing driver's licenses and better use of new technology, protecting the integrity of the election system with voter identification cards, moving up the state's primary on the calendar, and providing provisional election certificates after the canvassing phase were all offered during the event.

A video of this event is available online at Center for the Study of Politics and Governance website.

Learning from the 2008 U.S. Senate Recount Saga: Practical Reforms to Improve Minnesota Elections

Mark Ritchie, Minnesota Secretary of State
Ann Rest, Senator (DFL) and Chair, State and Local Government Operations and Oversight Committee
Tom Emmer, Representative (R) and Ranking Minority Member, State and Local Government Operations Reform, Technology and Elections Committee
Joe Mansky, Ramsey County Elections Manager

Moderated by Lawrence Jacobs, Professor, University of Minnesota

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: How Do Politicians Use Twitter? A Case Study of Rep. Laura Brod
Next post: South Dakota Sets Historic 76 Percent Yearly Increase in Unemployment Mark in June

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Strange Bedfellows: A Historical Review of Divided US Senate Delegations

Over the last century, states have been twice as likely to be represented by a single political party in the U.S. Senate than have a split delegation; only Delaware, Iowa, and Illinois have been divided more than half the time.

Political Crumbs

Haugh to Reach New Heights

The North Carolina U.S. Senate race between Democratic incumbent Kay Hagan and Republican Thom Tillis may go down to the wire next Tuesday, but along the way Libertarian nominee Sean Haugh is poised to set a state record for a non-major party candidate. Haugh, who previously won 1.5 percent of the vote in the Tar Heel State's 2002 race, has polled at or above five percent in 10 of the last 12 polls that included his name. The current high water mark for a third party or independent candidate in a North Carolina U.S. Senate election is just 3.3 percent, recorded by Libertarian Robert Emory back in 1992. Only one other candidate has eclipsed the three percent mark - Libertarian Christopher Cole with 3.1 percent in 2008.


Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting