Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


What Will Be the 'Obama Effect' on the 2010 Minnesota Gubernatorial Race?

Bookmark and Share

The recent news of Barack Obama's sliding approval ratings across key battleground states (e.g. Ohio, Virginia) as well as the nation (e.g. Gallup, Rasmussen) has raised the question as to what effect a potentially less popular (if not unpopular) President Obama will have on key statewide and Congressional contests during the 2010 election cycle.

While Minnesota is considered a Democratic-trending battleground state, the DFL has not won the Governor's office in nearly a quarter-century.

Additionally, a new Smart Politics historical analysis of the impact of the sitting president's political party on Minnesota gubernatorial races suggests having a Democrat in the White House might spell bad news for the DFL in 2010.

A Smart Politics analysis of Minnesota's 28 gubernatorial elections since 1930 finds a DFLer or a Democrat has been elected to the Governor's mansion with a Democratic president in D.C. on only 1 occasion.

Overall, since 1930, Minnesota has elected 15 Republicans, 8 DFLers, 4 Farmer-Laborites, and 1 Reform Party candidate as Governor of the Gopher State. But only once, in 1962, has a DFLer won a gubernatorial race (Karl Rolvaag) with a Democrat in the White House (John F. Kennedy).

Until quite recently Minnesota Republicans also struggled in gubernatorial contests when a member of their party controlled the White House. Republican presidents have been in office 13 times since 1930 with gubernatorial contests on Minnesota's Election Day ballot. Republicans have won the governorship just 4 times, although three of these have occurred since 1990: Elmer Anderson in 1960 (Eisenhower), Arne Carlson in 1990 (Bush 41), and Tim Pawlenty in 2002 and 2006 (Bush 43).

In total, the President's political party has carried the day in Minnesota gubernatorial elections in just 5 of 28 races since 1930, or 18 percent of the time. Even more startling, the president's party has lost by an average margin of 21.2 points during these 23 races.

As for Obama, his approval rating in Minnesota was at a yearly low of 59 percent in a mid-June SurveyUSA poll, until a recently released survey by Public Policy Polling found that rating slip to 54 percent in early July.

To what extent does the popularity or unpopularity of the President come into play in this historical trend? The data suggests there is some influence on Minnesota gubernatorial elections.

For example, Gallup public opinion data since 1942 shows that the average presidential approval rating closest to Election Day to be 49.6 percent for those 18 years in which the President's party did not win the governor's race in Minnesota.

During the 5 elections outlined above in which the President's party did win the gubernatorial contest in the Gopher State, the average approval rating was higher, at 55.8 percent. (That total includes George W. Bush's 38 percent approval rating endured by Governor Pawlenty during his remarkable 2006 victory that brought him into the national spotlight).

Still, high approval ratings do not provide fool-proof coattails: the top 4 presidential approval ratings heading into November elections all failed to carry the Gopher State governor's race for the president's party: FDR in 1942 (70 percent) and 1944 (70 percent), Eisenhower in 1956 (67 percent), and Clinton in 1998 (66 percent).

Minnesota Gubernatorial Party Victor vis-à-vis Partisan Control of the White House, 1930-2006

Year
President
Party
Pres. Approval
Gov. Winner
Pres. Party MoV
2006
Bush
GOP
38
GOP
1.0
2002
Bush
GOP
63
GOP
7.9
1998
Clinton
Democrat
66
Reform
-8.9
1994
Clinton
Democrat
46
GOP
-29.2
1990
Bush
GOP
58
GOP
3.3
1986
Reagan
GOP
63
DFL
-13.0
1982
Reagan
GOP
43
DFL
-18.9
1978
Carter
Democrat
49
GOP
-7.0
1974
Ford
GOP
54
DFL
-33.4
1970
Nixon
GOP
58
DFL
-8.5
1966
LBJ
Democrat
44
GOP
-5.7
1962
JFK
Democrat
62
DFL
0.0
1960
Eisenhower
GOP
58
GOP
1.5
1958
Eisenhower
GOP
57
DFL
-14.5
1956
Eisenhower
GOP
67
DFL
-3.2
1954
Eisenhower
GOP
61
DFL
-5.9
1952
Truman
Democrat
32
GOP
-11.3
1950
Truman
Democrat
41
GOP
-22.4
1948
Truman
Democrat
39
GOP
-8.0
1946
Truman
Democrat
33
GOP
-19.3
1944
FDR
Democrat
70
GOP
-23.8
1942
FDR
Democrat
70
GOP
-42.1
1940
FDR
Democrat
N/A
GOP
-41.0
1938
FDR
Democrat
N/A
GOP
-54.1
1936*
FDR
Democrat
N/A
F-L
-60.7
1934
FDR
Democrat
N/A
F-L
-27.8
1932
Hoover
GOP
N/A
F-L
-34.2
1930
Hoover
GOP
N/A
F-L
-23.0
* The Democrats did not field a candidate in the 1936 gubernatorial election. Approval rating data based on the latest Gallup (for 1944, OPOR) polling data available before the gubernatorial election day. Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Bachmann Voting Record Is 2nd Least Supportive of Obama in U.S. House
Next post: What Goes Up, Goes Down Slowly: A Long Road to Recovering Job Losses in Minnesota

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

No Free Passes: States With 2 Major Party Candidates in Every US House Race

Indiana has now placed candidates from both major parties on the ballot in a nation-best 189 consecutive U.S. House races, with New Hampshire, Minnesota, Idaho, and Montana also north of 100 in a row.

Political Crumbs

Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


An Idaho Six Pack

Two-term Idaho Republican Governor Butch Otter only polled at 39 percent in a recent PPP survey of the state's 2014 race - just four points ahead of Democratic businessman A.J. Balukoff. Otter's low numbers reflect his own struggles as a candidate (witness his weak primary win against State Senator Russ Fulcher) combined with the opportunity for disgruntled Idahoans to cast their votes for one of four third party and independent candidates, who collectively received the support of 12 percent of likely voters: Libertarian John Bujak, the Constitution Party's Steve Pankey, and independents Jill Humble and Pro-Life (aka Marvin Richardson). The six candidate options in a gubernatorial race sets an all-time record in the Gem State across the 46 elections conducted since statehood. The previous high water mark of five candidates was reached in seven previous cycles: 1902, 1904, 1908, 1912, 1914, 1966, and 2010.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting