Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Al Franken Receives First Grade As U.S. Senator: Minnesotans Split Down the Middle

Bookmark and Share

As DFL Senator Al Franken inched into office by the narrowest of margins, both he and 2008 Republican opponent Norm Coleman endured negative net favorability ratings as their expensive, and frequently brutal campaigns gained neither candidate favor with a majority of Minnesotans.

A few weeks out from Election Day saw unfavorable numbers for Franken rise to 53 percent in a December Rasmussen poll, with that number increasing to an all-time high of 55 percent in mid-May in the midst of Coleman's lawsuit (even though Minnesotans believed by a 4:1 margin that Franken would ultimately be named the winner of the race).

Shortly after Coleman's concession speech in late June, Franken was able to drop the "elect" from his title, and now Minnesotans have weighed in on their first opportunity to rate his performance as a Senator in Washington, D.C.

A newly released SurveyUSA poll conducted only two weeks into Franken's tenure finds Minnesotans unsurprisingly divided about how he is conducting himself as their Senator in Washington. The poll finds 43 percent of Gopher State adults approving of his job performance and 45 percent disapproving.

A recent Smart Politics analysis of Franken's colleague Amy Klobuchar found her approval ratings approaching a career low at 54 percent in July. Overall, many Democratic and Republican Senators have seen their approval ratings take a hit this year in light of the nation's economic and budget troubles.

Still, Franken begins his second month in office with one of the worst net approval ratings among newly elected members to the Senate in recent years.

A Smart Politics analysis of SurveyUSA data finds only Virginia Democratic Senator Jim Webb to have notched a lower net approval rating in his first month in office than Franken, of the nine Senators tracked by SurveyUSA who have entered office since January 2007.

By comparison, Senator Klobuchar's first ratings in January 2007 found her with a +26 net approval rating, with 56 percent approving of her early job performance and just 30 percent disapproving.

Net Approval Rating of Recently Elected U.S. Senators (Tracked by SurveyUSA)

State
Senator
Date
Approve
Disapprove
Net
VA
Mark Warner
1/09
67
20
+47
NM
Tom Udall
1/09
63
24
+39
MN
Amy Klobuchar
1/07
56
30
+26
OH
Sherrod Brown
1/07
47
32
+15
MO
Claire McCaskill
1/07
50
40
+10
OR
Jeff Merkley
1/09
42
34
+8
NY
Kirsten Gillibrand*
2/09
41
33
+8
MN
Al Franken
7/09
43
45
-2
VA
Jim Webb
1/07
42
47
-5
Note: Gillibrand was appointed to her seat. SurveyUSA data compiled by Smart Politics.

Still, Franken's low approval rating should not surprise political observers as the DFLer only received 42 percent of the vote last fall - virtually identical to the percentage of those now approving of his job performance (43 percent).

Similarly Senator Klobuchar received 58 percent of the vote in November 2006, which is about on par with her 56 percent approval rating in January 2007 just a few months later.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Can the DFL End Its Gubernatorial Drought?
Next post: Will Minnesota and Wisconsin Elect Governors from the Same Political Party in 2010?

1 Comment


  • I CAN'T BELIEVE THE STATE OF MINNESOTA COULD VOTE THIS FREAK IN TO OFFICE.

    This man is evil----he is also stupid
    It makes me ill to even look at his face on TV

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting