Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


How Long Before Brett Favre Gets a Job Approval Rating?

Bookmark and Share

With future Hall of Famer Brett Favre signing a two-year contract with the Minnesota Vikings this week, the Gopher State's most popular sports franchise is now officially led by the former face of its most hated rival, the Green Bay Packers.

Because of the animosity (although, at times, perhaps begrudging respect) Minnesotans have held for Favre over the past one and a half decades, the new Vikings quarterback begins his tenure in purple and gold with one of the lowest favorability ratings relative to those of notable public figures who have entered political office during the past ten years.

A Rasmussen poll of Minnesotans conducted in mid-July found 46 percent of Gopher State residents had a favorable view of Favre, with 42 percent having an unfavorable opinion of him. The poll was conducted two months prior to the season opener at Cleveland (and one month prior to Favre's official signing).

Smart Politics analyzed how Favre's favorability rating two months out from his first game as a Viking compared to the favorability marks leading politicians received among Minnesotans two months prior to assuming office. As it turns out, Favre is much less popular than most of the Gopher State's political officeholders.

· Joe Biden (63 percent) and Barack Obama (61 percent) received the highest marks when Gopher States residents were asked their opinion of the eventual President and Vice-President in late October of 2008 (in Big 10 Battleground and Rasmussen surveys, respectively).

· In November 2000, George W. Bush had a comparable 47 percent favorability rating two months before taking office, according to a Star Tribune poll.

· Tim Pawlenty had a 56 percent favorability mark back in November 2002 when he was elected to his first term as Governor, with only 26 percent holding an unfavorable view of him.

· Favre is also less popular than Norm Coleman (59 percent, November 2002), Amy Klobuchar (58 percent, November 2006), and Mark Dayton (55 percent, November 2000), two months before they took office in Washington, D.C.

· Only DFL Senator Al Franken, at 44 percent, had a lower favorability rating than Favre, and had more than a double-digit higher unfavorability mark at 55 percent, in a Rasmussen survey conducted in May 2009, two months prior to Franken being sworn into office.

Favorability Rating of Brett Favre vs. Political Figures At Two Months Out Before 'Opening Day'

Public Figure
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Date
Joe Biden
63%
25%
12%
10/08 (a)
Barack Obama
61%
38%
1%
10/08 (b)
Norm Coleman
59%
31%
10%
11/02 (c)
Amy Klobuchar
58%
38%
4%
11/06 (b)
Tim Pawlenty
56%
26%
18%
11/02 (c)
Mark Dayton
55%
31%
14%
11/00 (c)
George W. Bush
47%
44%
9%
11/00 (c)
Brett Favre
46%
42%
12%
7/09 (b)
Al Franken
44%
55%
2%
5/09 (b)
(a) Big 10 Battleground. (b) Rasmussen. (c) Minnesota Poll (Star Tribune).

The one big difference for Favre, however, is that his favorability rating has the potential to substantially go up - especially if he delivers an 11 or 12-win season for the Vikes and a trip deep into the playoffs. If any job approval rating polls of Favre are ever conducted this season, expect them to be closely tied to the Vikings' winning percentage.

While most politicians do not come into office with the kind of baggage Favre is carrying into Minneapolis this fall, favorability marks for political officeholders are frequently at their peak during this honeymoon period, and usually head south thereafter (e.g. President Bush's favorability rating was at just 25 percent in Minnesota in October 2008 and Senator Coleman's was 48 percent in December 2008).

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Will Minnesota and Wisconsin Elect Governors from the Same Political Party in 2010?
Next post: Michele Bachmann Appears on National Cable TV Every 9 Days

3 Comments


  • I shudder to think of the numbers you'd rattle off had you thrown in the Twins favorability percentages at the moment. ;o)

  • I agree with ya :)

  • I hope Favre steps it up this season and does well for his team.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting