Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Half of Minnesotans Believe Pawlenty Will Be the 2012 GOP Presidential Nominee

Bookmark and Share

A new Rasmussen poll finds Minnesotans are increasingly of the view that Governor Tim Pawlenty will win the Republican nomination for President in 2012.

Back in mid-May, 37 percent of Minnesota residents believed it was very likely (7 percent) or somewhat likely (30 percent) that Pawlenty would win the GOP nomination in three years. In the new poll, conducted of 500 likely voters on September 15th, that number has increased to 50 percent, with 16 percent now believing it is very likely Pawlenty will emerge as the Republican nominee and 34 percent believing it is somewhat likely.

Only 36 percent believed Pawlenty would not win the nomination, compared to 55 percent in May.

The Rasmussen survey was conducted before the Family Research Council's Value Voters Summit straw poll was conducted this weekend, in which Pawlenty finished third behind Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney.

There are a few possible explanations as to why Minnesotans believe in greater numbers today that Pawlenty will win the Republican presidential nomination as compared to four months ago.

First, back in May, Pawlenty had not yet announced his decision that he would not seek a third term as Governor. Many Republicans, and some independents, were perhaps reluctant to believe that their Governor would make a run for the Oval Office, and not for reelection in 2010.

Pawlenty's support for his job performance statewide, to be sure, is still solid. The new Rasmussen poll finds Pawlenty with a +13 net job approval rating (56 approving, 43 percent disapproving) - up from +7 in May and up from +1 the last time Rasmussen had asked this type of approval rating question, in November 2006 right before Pawlenty was reelected.

Another reason Minnesotans may find Pawlenty to be a more credible contender for the Republican nomination today is that his "clean-cut image" has distinguished himself from some of his once-rumored 2012 rivals, two of which saw any hope of potential presidential runs end this summer after sex scandals broke (South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford and Nevada Senator John Ensign).

A third reason Pawlenty may seem more 'presidential' to Minnesotans is that he is acting like a candidate - fundraising across the country for other GOPers, and attending high profile events out of state such as the Value Voters Summit this past weekend. In the new Rasmussen poll, 50 percent of Minnesotans said they were very or somewhat concerned about the amount of time Governor Pawlenty was spending outside of Minnesota.

Still, Pawlenty finds himself alongside several prominent ex-governors who populate the high-profile (though hypothetical) 2012 Republican candidate field (e.g. Huckabee, Romney, Sarah Palin). And while half of Minnesotans believe he will be the GOP nominee, winning the White House is yet another hurdle: for the path to the presidency has, to date, proved to be elusive for Minnesota politicians.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Minnesota Housing Foreclosure Rate Still Up 67 Percent Since Election Day
Next post: Which States Do Presidents Come From? (Not Minnesota, Yet)

1 Comment


  • He's no Charlie Crist or Jon Huntsman Jr., someone whose popularity at home clearly points toward some kind of special political acumen. True, almost any "opposite-color" governor of a reasonably large state is someone who is going to get at least a passing thought from his party. But there's no particularly good reason why, say, Tim Pawlenty is considered a serious presidential candidate and someone like Jodi Rell isn't.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Which States Own the Best Track Record in Backing Eventual GOP Presidential Nominees?

    Nine states (each with primaries) have an unblemished record in voting for the eventual Republican nominee since 1976 - and not all host contests on the back end of the calendar.

    Political Crumbs

    Evolving?

    When Scott Walker "punted" back in February after being asked if he was comfortable with the idea of evolution he added, "That's a question a politician shouldn't be involved in one way or the other." However, it may very well be a question that is asked at one of the upcoming GOP debates this year. In South Carolina during the first GOP debate in 2012, FOX News' Juan Williams asked Tim Pawlenty, "Do you equate the teaching of creationism with the teaching of evolution as the basis for what should be taught for our nation's schools?" Pawlenty replied, "There should be room in the curriculum for study of intelligent design" but that it was up to the local school districts if it should be in a science class or comparative theory class. At the fourth Republican debate held in California, Jon Huntsman addressed the GOP becoming "anti-science" thusly: "Listen, when you make comments that fly in the face of what 98 out of 100 climate scientists have said, when you call into question the science of evolution, all I'm saying is that, in order for the Republican Party to win, we can't run from science. We can't run from mainstream conservative philosophy."


    73 Months and Counting

    January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting