Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Obama Approval Rating Holds in Minnesota, Plummets in Iowa and Wisconsin

Bookmark and Share

Although Barack Obama's approval rating has taken an (expected) hit in Minnesota since the beginning of his term, a hit all presidents endure, a new SurveyUSA poll finds Gopher State residents much more patient with the new Democratic president than many states across the nation.

A poll of 600 adults, conducted August 26-27 by SurveyUSA, finds 53 percent of Minnesotans approve of the President's job performance, up a statistically insignificant 2 points from July. Forty-four percent disapproved of Obama's job performance.

What is particularly noteworthy is that Obama's approval rating dropped in August in 10 of the 13 states tracked each month by SurveyUSA, and by an average of 3.8 points.

In fact, Obama dipped to record lows in the neighboring states of Iowa and Wisconsin in the new round of surveys.

In Iowa, only 45 percent of adults give Obama positive marks this month, down a significant 11 points from July. Fifty-four percent disapprove. Likewise, in Wisconsin, just 45 percent approve of Obama's job performance, down from 50 percent in July. Fifty percent disapprove.

Obama's rating also dipped to record lows in the states of Alabama (40 percent), California (62 percent), Kentucky (36 percent), Missouri (48 percent), New Mexico (52 percent), New York (58 percent), Virginia (42 percent), and Washington (51 percent).

Perhaps it is due to Minnesota's culture of patience, with its ice fishing and slow-starting vehicles in the winter, but while the rest of the country has become increasingly impatient with Obama and the economic concerns facing the nation, more Minnesotans are, comparatively, giving him the benefit of the doubt.

Overall, Obama's approval rating has fallen at the slowest rate in Minnesota compared to the other 12 states tracked by SurveyUSA. The President's job performance rating has dropped only 17.2 percent since January in the Gopher State, compared to an average of 28.5 percent elsewhere.

In Wisconsin, Obama's approval rating has dropped a whopping 35.7 percent, from a lofty 70 percent in January to 45 percent in August. A similar story has unfolded in Iowa, where the President's approval rating has fallen 33.8 percent, from 68 percent in January to 45 percent in August.

One possible explanation for the more favorable view Minnesotans have of Barack Obama's job performance to date compared to its Upper Midwestern neighbors is that the Gopher State's job situation has somewhat stabilized. Minnesota's unemployment rate is up only 8 percent from January to July (7.5 to 8.1 percent), compared to 28.6 percent in Wisconsin (7.0 to 9.0 percent) and 35.4 percent in Iowa (4.8 to 6.5 percent).

Change in Barack Obama Approval Rating Since January 2009

State
January
August
Change
% Change
Minnesota
64
53
-11
-17.2
California
77
62
-15
-19.5
New Mexico
65
52
-13
-20.0
Oregon
68
54
-14
-20.6
New York
78
58
-20
-25.6
Washington
69
51
-18
-26.1
Missouri
65
48
-17
-26.2
Kansas
62
45
-17
-27.4
Virginia
62
42
-20
-32.3
Alabama
60
40
-20
-33.3
Iowa
68
45
-23
-33.8
Wisconsin
70
45
-25
-35.7
Kentucky
62
36
-26
-41.9
Average
66.9
48.5
-18.4
-27.7
Note: SurveyUSA data compiled by Smart Politics.

The most recent national tracking poll, released today by Rasmussen, finds Obama's approval rating at 45 percent, with 53 percent disapproving.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: A Profile of Minnesota's 94 DFL and GOP 'Stronghold' House Districts
Next post: How Many Minnesota House 'Swing Districts' Will Return to the GOP in 2010?

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting