Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Minnesota Remains Obama's Upper Midwestern Stronghold

Bookmark and Share

President Barack Obama's clean sweep through Minnesota, Iowa, and Wisconsin en route to his 2008 presidential election victory continues what has been a historical pattern for most of the past 150 years.

These three Upper Midwestern states have historically been a key electoral bloc for successful presidential campaigns since 1860, the first such election after the Gopher State achieved statehood. Presidential nominees who have swept through these states have won 23 of 27 elections during this span.

Only Al Gore (2000), Michael Dukakis (1988), Charles Hughes (1916), and James Blaine (1884) failed to win the White House after sweeping Minnesota, Iowa, and Wisconsin.

However, while the support President Obama enjoyed nationwide at the onset of his term has eroded, as expected, in several "McCain states" across the country, he has seen some of the biggest erosion occur in (light) blue states right here in the Upper Midwest.

The latest SurveyUSA polling, conducted a little over a week ago, finds that while Obama's approval rating remains fairly steady in Minnesota, it has declined noticeably in the neighboring states of Iowa and Wisconsin.

In Minnesota, 55 percent of adults approve of Obama's job performance - up from 53 percent in August and 51 percent in July. Although Obama's rating is down from his high water mark of 64 percent back at the beginning of his 'honeymoon period' in January of this year, it is still slightly north of the percentage of Minnesotans who voted for him last November (54 percent).

This is not the case for Obama in Minnesota's neighbors to the south and east.

Although Obama had a virtually identical level of support on Election Day in Iowa (54 percent) and Wisconsin (56 percent) as he did in Minnesota, his approval rating has fallen to 46 and 47 percent in the Hawkeye and Badger States respectively.

The 16.1 percent drop-off in support for Obama since the November election among Wisconsinites and 14.8 percent decline among Iowans are the largest among the 13 states tracked each month by SurveyUSA.

The low marks received by Obama in Iowa and Wisconsin do not appear to be statistical aberrations - the President received an approval rating of 45 percent in both states in SurveyUSA's August round of polling as well.

Since January, Obama's job performance rating has dropped 32.9 percent in Wisconsin (from 70 to 47 percent) and 32.4 percent in Iowa (from 68 to 46 percent).

Minnesota is one of only three states tracked by SurveyUSA in which Obama's current approval rating is higher than the percentage of the vote he received last November (the others being Oregon at +2 points and California at +1).

Barack Obama Approval Ratings Vis-à-vis Percentage of Presidential Vote Received

State
Approval
Vote
Diff.
% Diff.
Oregon
59
57
+2
+3.5
Minnesota
55
54
+1
+1.9
California
62
61
+1
+1.6
New York
63
63
0
0.0
Kentucky
39
41
-2
-4.9
Alabama
37
39
-2
-5.1
Washington
53
57
-4
-7.0
Kansas
39
42
-3
-7.1
Virginia
49
53
-4
-7.5
Missouri
44
49
-5
-10.2
New Mexico
50
57
-7
-12.3
Iowa
46
54
-8
-14.8
Wisconsin
47
56
-9
-16.1
Average
49.5
52.5
-3.1
-5.9
Source: SurveyUSA polls of 600 adults in each state, conducted September 27-28, 2009.

A recent Star Tribune poll found Obama with a 51 percent approval rating in the Gopher State and a 45 percent disapproval rating. The SurveyUSA poll measured Obama's disapproval rating at just 40 percent.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Absence Does Not Make the Heart Grow Fonder: Pawlenty Disapproval Rating Reaches All-Time High
Next post: Midwest Has Highest Per Capita Rate of Iraq War Fatalities and Casualties

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting