Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Inside the War in Afghanistan

Bookmark and Share

Minnesota, Iowa, and Wisconsin rank among the Bottom 10 states in per capita fatalities; non-hostile deaths account for more than 25 percent of U.S. death toll

President Barack Obama's announcement at West Point Tuesday evening that another 30,000 troops will be deployed in the war against the Taliban and al-Qaida in Afghanistan comes at what many military (and political) analysts believe is a critical tipping point in the war.

Although U.S. fatalities in November (17) were the lowest amount since May of this year, October had been the bloodiest month to date of the 8+ year-old war, with 60 U.S. troops perishing in what has become one of the longest military conflicts in U.S. history.

Overall, 929 U.S. forces have died in the war, with the highest per capita death toll endured by military personnel hailing from the South (3.21 per 1 million residents), followed by the West (3.01), Midwest (2.82), and Northeast (2.73) according to a Smart Politics analysis of data provided by iCasualties.

Minnesota - and its neighboring states of Iowa and Wisconsin - all rank among the bottom 10 states in terms of per capita fatalities in the war. Minnesota is ranked #43 (2.11 per 1 million residents) with Wisconsin at #42 (2.13) and Iowa at #44 (2.00).

Overall, 11 Minnesotans have died in the Afghan conflict, with 12 from Wisconsin and 6 from Iowa. Military personnel from Rhode Island have the lowest per capita death rate (0.95 per million).

U.S. Military Fatalities in Afghanistan by State, 2001-2009

Rank
State
Deaths
Per Capita
1
Maine
12
9.12
2
North Dakota
4
6.24
3
West Virginia
11
6.06
4
Wyoming
3
5.63
5
Nevada
14
5.38
6
New Hampshire
7
5.32
7
Montana
5
5.17
8
Oklahoma
18
4.94
9
Kansas
13
4.64
10
Washington
29
4.43
11
Alaska
3
4.37
12
Missouri
25
4.23
13
Louisiana
18
4.08
14
Massachusetts
26
4.00
15
Oregon
15
3.96
16
South Carolina
17
3.79
17
Maryland
21
3.73
18
New Mexico
7
3.53
19
North Carolina
32
3.47
20
Nebraska
6
3.36
21
Virginia
26
3.35
22
Illinois
43
3.33
23
Utah
9
3.29
24
Florida
59
3.22
24
Alabama
15
3.22
26
Georgia
30
3.10
27
Arizona
20
3.08
28
Kentucky
13
3.05
29
Indiana
19
2.98
30
Pennsylvania
36
2.89
31
Mississippi
8
2.72
32
Texas
65
2.67
33
Tennessee
16
2.57
34
New York
49
2.51
35
South Dakota
2
2.49
36
California
91
2.48
37
Arkansas
7
2.45
38
Hawaii
3
2.33
39
Colorado
11
2.23
40
Michigan
22
2.20
41
Ohio
25
2.18
42
Wisconsin
12
2.13
43
Minnesota
11
2.11
44
Iowa
6
2.00
45
Idaho
3
1.97
46
Vermont
1
1.61
47
New Jersey
13
1.50
48
Connecticut
5
1.43
49
Delaware
1
1.15
50
Rhode Island
1
0.95
Other
21
Total
929
Source: iCasualties.org data compiled by Smart Politics with 2008 U.S. Census Bureau population estimates.

As is normally the case in war, the deaths of U.S. Military personnel have not been evenly distributed across the Armed Services.

The U.S. Army has suffered more than four times the number of fatalities than any other branch of the U.S. military.

At 560 deaths, the Army has endured 60.3 percent of all American military fatalities in the war. The U.S. Marine Corps has seen 126 of its personnel die in the war (13.6 percent), the U.S. Navy has lost 51 personnel (5.5 percent) and 42 members of the U.S. Air Force have perished (4.5 percent).

The use of the National Guard (for multiple tours) has been one of the more controversial aspects of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Overall, 106 members of the U.S. Army (97) and U.S. Air (9) National Guards have died in the Afghan war.

An additional 39 Reservists in the U.S. Army, U.S. Marines, and U.S.Navy have also died.

Deaths in War in Afghanistan by Military Branch, 2001-2009

Branch
Deaths
Percent
U.S. Army
560
60.3
U.S. Marines
126
13.6
U.S. Army National Guard
97
10.4
U.S. Navy
51
5.5
U.S. Air Force
42
4.5
U.S. Army Reserve
31
3.3
U.S. Air National Guard
9
1.0
U.S. Marine Reserve
6
0.6
CIA
4
0.4
U.S. Navy Reserve
2
0.2
N/A
1
0.1
Total
929
100.0
Source: iCasualties.org data compiled by Smart Politics.

While fighting has been fierce during the last year of the war (U.S. fatalities will likely be twice as high in 2009 by year's end than in any other year of the war to date), a large number of deaths have occurred in non-hostile situations.

More than one-quarter of the 929 U.S. military fatalities in Afghanistan (262, or 28.2 percent) have been due to non-hostile causes.

The majority of non-hostile related deaths have come from crashes of helicopters (81, 30.9 percent), ground vehicles (36, 13.7 percent) and aircraft (21, 8.0 percent) in non-combat situations.

Two members of the U.S. military have committed suicide while in Afghanistan.

Cause of U.S. Military Deaths in Afghanistan (Non-Hostile), 2001-2009

Cause
Number
Percent
Helicopter crash
81
30.9
Vehicle crash
36
13.7
Aircraft crash
21
8.0
Non-combat wounds
10
3.8
Illness
9
3.4
Ordnance explosion
8
3.1
Drowning
5
1.9
Weapon discharge
4
1.5
Traffic accident
2
0.8
Suicide
2
0.8
Self-inflicted gunshot
2
0.8
Natural causes
2
0.8
Land mine
1
0.4
Unspecified / other
79
30.4
Total
262
100.0
Source: iCasualties.org data compiled by Smart Politics.

The remaining 667 U.S. fatalities (71.8 percent) have been in hostile combat situations, with nearly half of these being caused by improvised explosive devices (310, 46.5 percent).

A very low percentage of deaths have been caused by suicide bombers (15, 2.2 percent) with deaths by hostile fire (132, 19.8 percent) and small arms fire (117, 17.5 percent) much more prevalent.

Cause of U.S. Military Deaths in Afghanistan (Hostile), 2001-2009

Cause
Number
Percent
Improvised Explosive Device (IED)
310
46.5
Hostile fire (general)
132
19.8
Small arms fire
117
17.5
Helicopter / plane crash
34
5.1
Rocket-propelled grenade (RPG)
18
2.7
Suicide bomber
15
2.2
Land mine
11
1.6
Rocket fire
6
0.9
Friendly fire (hostile situation)
5
0.7
Indirect fire
5
0.7
Bomb
4
0.6
Mortar attack
3
0.4
Grenade attack
1
0.1
Other
6
0.9
Total
667
100.0
Source: iCasualties.org data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Will a New Stadium Make the Minnesota Vikings a More Successful Franchise?
Next post: Pawlenty Unflappable Amid Press Corps Accusations that 2012 Aspirations Hindering His Ability to Govern During Budget Crisis

1 Comment


  • We need to leave Afghanistan ASAP not wait till 2014 and start spending those money on infrastructure building (high-speed trains, solar farms, algae farms, wind farms) and invest on fusions research to commercialize fusions power plants.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting