Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Pawlenty Unflappable Amid Press Corps Accusations that 2012 Aspirations Hindering His Ability to Govern During Budget Crisis

Bookmark and Share

Governor is adamant that, despite rumored political aspirations or busy travel schedule, there is "no work in his office or administration that is left undone"

At a press conference Wednesday afternoon discussing the State of Minnesota's projected $1.2 billion deficit, Governor Tim Pawlenty was constantly barraged with questions, insinuations, and direct accusations that his ability to tackle the state's budget problems and demonstrate leadership during these difficult economic times are compromised by his national ambitions and aggressive travel schedule.

Nearly half of the questions directed towards Pawlenty by the press corps during the half-hour news conference were variations on the same theme, approached with varying degrees of brashness. And that theme was, "How can you govern and lead if you're not focused on the pressing issues facing the state of Minnesota?"

Pawlenty, however, was reluctant to take the bait, and remained unflappable by flatly dismissing any such charges that his administration is leaving any stone unturned as Minnesota faces its worst economic crisis since World War II.

The issue was first raised just a few questions into the press conference, when one member of the media disguised a question about politics inside a question purportedly about policy:

Reporter #1: "Governor, would you agree to revenue - specifically tax increases - under any situation, is there any possibility that you might do that? And then, second part of my question, Democrats say if your answer is "no" that you need to be thinking about Minnesota rather than the national political stage."

In his usual calm tone Pawlenty spoke at great length to the policy end of the question, but not the political implications...

Governor Pawlenty: "Well, first of all, you have to put this in context. Again, with the exception of Montana and North Dakota, every state in the nation is facing the same or similar circumstances. So, if the solution were if we had a Democratic governor who raised taxes, you will find that in those states that did, that they all would have deficits. So there isn't a unique, Minnesota perspective here. This is happening to the whole country. It's happening in states with Democratic governors, it's happening in states with Republican governors. Secondly, you would be hard pressed - and any fair minded person would be hard pressed - to look at Minnesota's taxation structure and levels, particularly as it relates to income or job-related taxes, to say, relative to the rest of the country, we are undertaxed. That is not a credible argument. If anything, Minnesota is overtaxed and we should be focused on reducing burdens, particularly in those areas that will be helpful to stimulate job growth and economic activity."

A few minutes later, another member of the media pressed Pawlenty more directly about whether he is governing to the best of his abilities...

Reporter #2: "Can't you do anything short-term to give Minnesotans some hope? And I'm thinking, frankly, about changing your schedule to work harder to create jobs."

Pawlenty replied that he didn't understand the question.

So, the reporter tried again...

Reporter #2: "OK. I'm thinking of (former DFL) Governor Perpich during the last really terrible recession and he said that he would do nothing but worry about creating jobs for Minnesota. And, frankly, he did some things a little wacky, but he did all his travel, nationally and internationally, which focused on promoting Minnesota as a place for business. Shouldn't you be doing more of that?"

Governor Pawlenty's answer to this charge was that he would soon be going on a trade mission to do just that and then proceeded to explain the importance, once again, of making the Gopher State more business-friendly. The Governor was just about to let the reporter's political jab go, but then added...

Governor Pawlenty: "And the work around here - it gets done. There is nothing in our office or administration that doesn't get done."

That prompted the reporter to take his gloves off, and follow up by explicitly addressing the elephant in the room...

Reporter #2: "But if you're traveling the nation, why aren't you selling Minnesota instead of running for an office that doesn't exist for another three years?"

Pawlenty answered rather flatly...

Governor Pawlenty: "You know I'm not doing that. I haven't decided that yet. And the work here and around the country is getting done. What are you suggesting?"

Reporter #2: "Well, I'm suggesting that you take a more aggressive stance in trying to address the jobs problem that we just heard --"

The Governor interrupted the reporter and issued the following challenge...

Governor Pawlenty: "There is no opportunity that we haven't pursued or any job left undone relative to our office or administration, and if you can identify one let me know."

After a brief departure by the media for a few minutes asking the Governor questions on substantive policy issues from health care to the new Vikings stadium, the topic once again turned to Pawlenty's ability to govern the state...

Reporter #3: "Governor, some of your critics are saying you're putting your political aspirations ahead of your state. Will you put a run for president off the table in 2012?"

Governor Pawlenty: "I'm not sure what that has to do with it."

Reporter #3: "Well, they're saying you're putting your political aspirations and possible run for president -"

Governor Pawlenty: "Yeah - I disagree. My views haven't changed since 2003. They're not new. They're not somehow inspired by the implication of the question."

Reporter #3: "You're not willing to take it off the table?"

Governor Pawlenty: "I don't know what I'm going to be doing after 2010. But I do know that I will finish my term as Governor."

Then another reporter chimed in...

Reporter #4: "Do you plan on slowing down or changing your travel schedule nationally during this crisis?"

Governor Pawlenty: "The measure isn't that. It's - does the work get done? And, again, given the number of hours that I put in, there is no work in my administration that's left undone."

The press conference ended a few minutes after this exchange.

Whether the goal of the Capitol press corps, however improbable, was to get a direct answer to these political questions, or whether reporters felt they wouldn't be doing their job if they didn't try to rattle the cage of the savvy Governor, this latest round of the press corps-gubernatorial matchup is scored 10-9 in favor of Pawlenty.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Inside the War in Afghanistan
Next post: Should RT Rybak Run His Gubernatorial Campaign as a Tough-on-Crime Democrat?

2 Comments


  • Governor Pawlenty appears to suffer from Romney's flaw of running away from his record. The media would have had made a better impression if its questions had been directed on the relationship between the governor's views on new revenue streams and the structural budget deficit.

    The governor's own 2009 blue ribbon panel of business leaders suggested cutting or removing the capital gains tax and replacing it with an expanded sales tax to services and clothing as well as tobacco.

    The governor is more concerned that his 2012 campaign slogan: "I did not raise taxes" remains viable, rather than fixing the state structural budget problems.

    Apparently he can walk away and the best the media can do is ask about his travel?

  • While democrats have more than embraced spending cuts and are working overtime to use the figures from the State Economist to put together real policy alternatives why is Pawlenty not personally participating in this effort and why will he not even consider moving away from his ideological pledge to Grover Norquist and also consider revenue enhancements? While a world and national leading valuable Minnesota institution such as the HCMC is rapidly disassembling will Pawlenty not even tie a revenue stream directly to its health? If there is not even a hint of comprimise in Pawlenty's tax stance why bother to hold a legislative session. Pawlenty can just unallot it.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting