Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Should RT Rybak Run His Gubernatorial Campaign as a Tough-on-Crime Democrat?

Bookmark and Share

Minneapolis October '09 Crime Rate Falls 10 Percent from a Year Ago Despite 27 Percent Rise in Unemployment

The Minneapolis Police Department's newly-released Uniform Crime Report (UCR) data for October 2009 finds crime in Minnesota's largest city down 10.1 percent from one year ago, despite a 27 percent increase in unemployment during that span.

That news comes as Minneapolis' Mayor, R.T. Rybak recently joined a crowded DFL field last month when he officially filed paperwork creating the R.T. Rybak for Governor Committee. Rybak will formally kick off his gubernatorial campaign this Sunday afternoon at the Varsity Theater in Dinkytown, Minneapolis.

On Rybak's campaign website, the newly reelected 2-term mayor outlines his plan for five big policy issues: jobs and opportunity, budget and reform, education and the next generation, health care, and rural economy. (A placeholder for a transportation plan is listed as 'coming soon').

But one policy issue which has been a focus of Rybak's nearly eight years as mayor that is only lightly discussed on his 2010 campaign website is crime policy.

Curious, that is, because Rybak has presided over a significant drop in crime in Minneapolis during his mayoral tenure.

For example, the October 2009 city-wide total of UCR Part 1 offenses (homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft, and arson) is down 23 percent (2,112) from October 2001 (2,742), two months before Rybak took office. This decrease has occurred despite unemployment in Minneapolis being 67 percent higher in October 2009 (7.0 percent) than in October 2001 (4.2 percent).

The decline in crime during this period is not a fluke.

Looking at monthly crime rate totals in 2001 before Rybak took office versus the respective crime rates for these months in 2009 reveals double-digit decreases in crime for each cycle, despite an unemployment rate that has nearly doubled on average during this span.

Change in Minneapolis Crime Totals and Unemployment Rate by Month, 2001 vs. 2009 (January-October)

Period
2001
2009
Change
Unemployment
January
1,821
1,587
-12.9
+102.9
February
1,505
1,225
-18.6
+129.0
March
1,792
1,565
-12.7
+111.4
April
2,128
1,667
-21.7
+97.1
May
2,360
1,888
-20.0
+117.6
June
2,454
2,018
-17.8
+104.9
July
2,843
2,263
-20.4
+97.5
August
2,610
2,080
-20.3
+88.1
September
2,465
2,120
-14.0
+78.6
October
2,742
2,112
-23.0
+66.7
Total
22,720
18,525
-18.5
+97.9
Note: Crime totals include the number of Part I UCR crimes of homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft, and arson. Sources: Minneapolis Police Department Uniform Crime Reports and Department of Employment and Economic Development data compiled by Smart Politics.

Rybak's record on crime over the course of the past year is noteworthy as well: crime in Minneapolis has dropped by double-digits in each month in 2009 compared to the respective period 12-months prior despite an average increase in unemployment of 48.8 percent.

Change in Minneapolis Crime Totals and Unemployment Rate by Month, 2008 vs. 2009 (January-October)

Period
2008
2009
Change
Unemployment
January
1,802
1,587
-11.9
+60.5
February
1,418
1,225
-13.6
+77.5
March
1,740
1,565
-10.1
+72.1
April
2,039
1,667
-18.2
+72.5
May
2,301
1,888
-17.9
+57.4
June
2,545
2,018
-20.7
+58.5
July
2,807
2,263
-19.4
+36.2
August
2,507
2,080
-17.0
+29.5
September
2,458
2,120
-13.8
+25.0
October
2,350
2,110
-10.1
+27.3
Total
21,967
18,523
-15.3
+48.8
Note: Crime totals include the number of Part I UCR crimes of homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft, and arson. Sources: Minneapolis Police Department Uniform Crime Reports and Department of Employment and Economic Development data compiled by Smart Politics.

Rybak's accomplishments on crime are mentioned on his campaign website, but not in great detail. The only mention to crime policy on his website's "Issues" section is a one paragraph reference to the reduction of violent crime among Minneapolis' youth (tucked away under his "Education and the next generation" plan). Rybak also mentions the reduction of crime during his tenure as mayor on his "About R.T." page.

Taken together, Rybak seems to be incorporating his record on crime in his gubernatorial campaign for retroactive biographical purposes, but not as part of a prospective statewide law and order policy plan.

Of course, Rybak is not yet running a general election campaign.

Crime policy is not normally one of the top-tier issues on the DFL agenda - either for the party or the primary voting electorate, and that might explain why Rybak is shrewdly focusing on tried-and-true DFL issues such as health care and education at this time.

However, should Rybak win the DFL nomination and/or primary, do not be surprised if crime policy, and a more detailed touting of his record on law and order issues as mayor of Minnesota's largest city, plays a much greater role in his campaign.

But, for the moment, the mayor is apparently content to keep this crime policy card half way up his sleeve.

Should he end up on the general election ballot in 2010, Rybak would benefit greatly by playing the card at that time to showcase a broad-based gubernatorial campaign that could better appeal to moderates and some conservatives in order to build a winning coalition of voters.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Pawlenty Unflappable Amid Press Corps Accusations that 2012 Aspirations Hindering His Ability to Govern During Budget Crisis
Next post: McCollum Stands Alone in Support of Obama's Afghan War Policy Among U.S. House's Most Liberal Wing

2 Comments


  • Yeah, I keep seeing comments like this around the political blogs. Crime dropped nationwide, even in cities with poor mayoral governance. Sorry dude, not really attributable to Rybak.

  • Yeah, I know what you mean. Its kinda like when Governor Pawlenty says he balances the state budget (cash management). Yet we still face a 1.2 billion dollar deficit. Poor governance does come to mind.....

    I guess mayor's and governor's take credit and responsibility for what they can or they simply run from their record.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting