Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


If Democrats Lose Control of the US House in 2010, Will the Minnesota House Follow Suit?

Bookmark and Share

Potential tidal wave election year for the GOP in D.C. is no guarantee for similar gains in the Minnesota House

As Republicans continue to hold a fair lead in national generic congressional matchup polls, speculation by D.C. watchers and political strategists revolves around the extent to which the GOP will make gains in the 2010 mid-term elections.

Some political strategists (e.g. Dick Morris) have been predicting a Republican takeover of the U.S. House for months, while other D.C. experts (e.g. Larry Sabato, Charlie Cook) have put forth scenarios for double digit to 20+ seat gains for the GOP.

But if a 'wave' election should occur in 2010 to vault the Republicans into control of the U.S. House, what can we expect to happen to the DFL's large majority in the Minnesota House? How tied to the national political scene are Minnesota's state House races?

In what might not be a shock to Gopher State residents, Minnesota's political pulse is often not in sync with what is happening elsewhere across the country.

Smart Politics conducted an analysis of the partisan shifts in the U.S. House and Minnesota House over the past six decades and found that what happens in the Gopher State is often the reverse course of what is happening nationwide.

First, the political party that has made gains in the U.S. House is the party that has lost seats in the Minnesota House in 6 of the last 11 election cycles dating back to 1988 (1988, 1990, 1992, 1996, 1998, and 2004).

In three of these years (1992, 1998, 2004) the partisan makeup of the Minnesota House changed at least 10 percentage points while a change in the opposite direction occurred in the US House:

· From Election Day 1990 to 1992, the DFL seat advantage in the MN House increased from 19.3 percent (an 80 to 54 seat advantage) to 29.6 percent (an 87 to 47 seat advantage) - a 10.3 percent net change in partisan control. In the U.S. House, Republicans gained 9 seats during this span.
· From Election Day 1996 to 1998, the DFL saw its 4.4 percent seat advantage (70 to 64 seats) turn into a 5.9 percent seat deficit (63 to 71 seats) - a 10.4 percent net change in partisan control. In the U.S. House, Democrats gained 5 seats.
· From Election Day 2002 to 2004, the DFL whittled its 22.2 percent seat deficit (52 to 82 seats) to just a 1.5 percent seat deficit (66 to 68 seats) - a 20.7 percentage point gain. Republicans in the U.S. House, meanwhile, gained three seats in the '02 election cycle.

Secondly, dating back to the early 1950s, Gopher State residents have bucked national shifts toward the Republican Party on seven occasions.

In 1952, 1960, 1968, 1972, 1980, 1992, and 2004, the DFL (and previously liberal) caucus made gains in the Minnesota House while the Republican Party made gains in the U.S. House.

(Note: According to the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library, from 1913 through 1973, while Minnesota legislators were elected on nonpartisan ballots, legislators ran and caucused as "liberals" or "conservatives" - roughly equivalent in most years to Democrat / DFL and Republicans respectively).

Some of these GOP gains in D.C. were, in fact, quite substantial: 22 seats in 1952, 21 seats in 1960, 12 seats in 1972, and 34 seats in 1980.

Overall, across the 29 election cycles since 1952, partisan shifts in the Minnesota House have been in sync with the shift in the U.S. House in just 17 cycles:

· Democrats picked up seats in the Minnesota House and the U.S. House on 11 occasions: 1954, 1956, 1958, 1964, 1970, 1974, 1982, 1986, 2000, 2006, and 2008.
· Republicans picked up seats in both bodies on 6 occasions: 1962, 1966, 1978, 1984, 1994, and 2002.
· Democrats made gains in the Minnesota House while losing seats in the U.S. House on 7 occasions: 1952, 1960, 1968, 1972, 1980, 1992, and 2004.
· Republicans picked up seats in the Minnesota House while losing seats in the U.S. House 4 times: 1988, 1990, 1996, and 1998.
· In 1976 there was no change in partisan composition of the Minnesota House with a slight GOP gain in the U.S. House.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: A Year in Smart Politics
Next post: Will Brett Favre Yet Be the Vikings Stadium Savior? (A Case for Favre as MVP)

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

No Free Passes: States With 2 Major Party Candidates in Every US House Race

Indiana has now placed candidates from both major parties on the ballot in a nation-best 189 consecutive U.S. House races, with New Hampshire, Minnesota, Idaho, and Montana also north of 100 in a row.

Political Crumbs

Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


An Idaho Six Pack

Two-term Idaho Republican Governor Butch Otter only polled at 39 percent in a recent PPP survey of the state's 2014 race - just four points ahead of Democratic businessman A.J. Balukoff. Otter's low numbers reflect his own struggles as a candidate (witness his weak primary win against State Senator Russ Fulcher) combined with the opportunity for disgruntled Idahoans to cast their votes for one of four third party and independent candidates, who collectively received the support of 12 percent of likely voters: Libertarian John Bujak, the Constitution Party's Steve Pankey, and independents Jill Humble and Pro-Life (aka Marvin Richardson). The six candidate options in a gubernatorial race sets an all-time record in the Gem State across the 46 elections conducted since statehood. The previous high water mark of five candidates was reached in seven previous cycles: 1902, 1904, 1908, 1912, 1914, 1966, and 2010.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting