Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Klobuchar and Franken to Get Boost in Senate Seniority After 2010 Election

Bookmark and Share

Gopher State delegation currently has second lowest collective seniority in the U.S. Senate

Minnesota's fresh-faced U.S. Senators Amy Klobuchar and Al Franken are on the verge of a much-needed boost in seniority in 2011, given the rash of retirements that have been announced in the 2010 election cycle, and the potential ousting of even more sitting Senators at the ballot box this November.

The Gopher State U.S. Senate delegation currently is ranked second to the bottom for collective years of service in the Senate, at just 3.7 years to date, and for its cumulative seniority ranking of 178.

Senator Klobuchar has a seniority ranking of #80 while Franken comes in at #98.

Only Colorado's tandem of Democratic Senators Mark Udall and 2009 appointee Michael Bennet rank lower in both categories (2.2 years and 191 respectively).

Eight U.S. Senators who have a higher seniority ranking than both Klobuchar and Franken are not seeking reelection in 2010: Chris Dodd (#9, CT), Kit Bond (#21, MO), Byron Dorgan (#27, ND), Judd Gregg (#29, NH), Sam Brownback (#38, KS), Jim Bunning (#48, KY), George Voinovich (#51, OH), and Evan Bayh (#52, IN).

An additional two Democratic Senators (both appointees) who have a higher ranking than Franken will also retire: Roland Burris (#94, IL) and Ted Kaufman (#95, DE).

Excluding any potential unseating of incumbents that may occur at the ballot box in November, Klobuchar will move up to at least #72 in the Senate seniority rankings, with Franken moving up to at least #88.

When these 11 retirements take hold in January 2011, the collective years of service of the Minnesota Senate delegation will eclipse the delegations of Missouri, Ohio, and New Hampshire to move the Gopher State up from #49 nationwide to #46.

Minnesota's new faces on the Hill stand in stark contrast to several Upper Midwestern U.S. Senate delegations that currently rank among the Top 10 longest-serving in the nation: Iowa comes in at #3 (54.2 years collectively for Chuck Grassley and Tom Harkin), with North Dakota at #7 (40.3 years for Dorgan and Kent Conrad), and Wisconsin at #9 (38.2 years for Herb Kohl and Russ Feingold).

Aside from the office perks associated with increased seniority within the Senate, the most tangible benefit Minnesota residents would receive from its delegation's rise in the seniority rankings is the increased power its Senators will have to choose committee assignments, as well the rise in rank in some of the committees on which Klobuchar and Franken already serve.

Klobuchar currently serves on the Judiciary Committee, Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, Environment and Public Works Committee, and Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee. She also serves on the Joint Economic Committee.

Franken serves with Klobuchar on the Judiciary Committee, plus the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, the Committee on Indian Affairs, and the Special Committee on Aging.

In addition to the nearly one dozen retirees exiting the Senate, the Democratic seats held by Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas and Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada are in particular jeopardy of flipping to the GOP this November.

In the Democratic caucus, Senators Lincoln (Chairwoman, Agriculture Committee) and Dorgan (Commerce) hold rank over Klobuchar in her major committee assignments, while Dodd (Health, Education, Labor & Pensions), Dorgan (Indian Affairs), Lincoln (Aging), and Bayh (Aging) do so over Franken in his committees.

Of course, if there are too many Democratic seats that end up switching to the Republican column in November, then any power gained through increased seniority by Klobuchar and Franken could be offset if the Democrats fall into minority party status in the chamber (should the GOP cobble together enough victories to reach 51 seats).

Years of U.S. Senate Service by State Delegation

Rank
State
Senior
Junior
Total
1
West Virginia
51.1
25.1
76.2
2
Hawaii
47.1
19.7
66.8
3
Iowa
29.1
25.1
54.2
4
Connecticut
29.1
21.1
50.2
4
Utah
33.1
17.1
50.2
6
Indiana
33.1
11.1
44.2
7
North Dakota
23.1
17.2
40.3
8
Michigan
31.1
9.1
40.2
9
Arizona
23.1
15.1
38.2
9
Vermont
35.1
3.1
38.2
9
Wisconsin
21.1
17.1
38.2
12
Alabama
23.1
13.1
36.2
12
Kentucky
25.1
11.1
36.2
14
California
17.3
17.1
34.4
15
Montana
31.2
3.1
34.3
16
Mississippi
31.2
2.2
33.4
17
Nevada
23.1
9.1
32.2
17
Pennsylvania
29.1
3.1
32.2
19
New Jersey
25.1*
4.1
29.2
20
Maine
15.1
13.1
28.2
20
New Mexico
27.1
1.1
28.2
22
Kansas
13.3
13.1
26.4
23
Maryland
23.1
3.1
26.2
23
Missouri
23.1
3.1
26.2
23
Washington
17.1
9.1
26.2
26
Massachusetts
25.1
0.1
25.2
27
Texas
16.6
7.1
23.7
28
Oklahoma
15.3
5.1
20.4
29
Arkansas
11.1
7.1
18.2
29
Louisiana
13.1
5.1
18.2
29
New Hampshire
17.1
1.1
18.2
29
South Dakota
13.1
5.1
18.2
33
Rhode Island
13.1
3.1
16.2
34
Wyoming
13.1
2.6
15.7
35
Oregon
13.9
1.1
15.0
36
Illinois
13.1
1.1
14.2
36
Ohio
11.1
3.1
14.2
38
Georgia
7.1
5.1
12.2
38
Idaho
11.1
1.1
12.2
38
New York
11.1
1.1
12.2
38
South Carolina
7.1
5.1
12.2
42
Delaware
9.1
1.1
10.2
42
Nebraska
9.1
1.1
10.2
42
Tennessee
7.1
3.1
10.2
45
Florida
9.1
1.0
10.1
46
Alaska
7.2
1.1
8.3
47
North Carolina
5.1
1.1
6.2
48
Virginia
3.1
1.1
4.2
49
Minnesota
3.1
0.6
3.7
50
Colorado
1.1
1.1
2.2
* Not all of New Jersey senior U.S. Senator Frank Lautenberg's service has been consecutive. Lautenberg served 18+ years (from December 1982-January 2001) prior to his current run of 7+ years (January 2003-present).

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Pawlenty Prepares Veto #101 for Health Care Bill
Next post: Health Care Reform Advocate Praises New Obama Proposal at HHH Event

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Which States Own the Best Track Record in Backing Eventual GOP Presidential Nominees?

Nine states (each with primaries) have an unblemished record in voting for the eventual Republican nominee since 1976 - and not all host contests on the back end of the calendar.

Political Crumbs

Evolving?

When Scott Walker "punted" back in February after being asked if he was comfortable with the idea of evolution he added, "That's a question a politician shouldn't be involved in one way or the other." However, it may very well be a question that is asked at one of the upcoming GOP debates this year. In South Carolina during the first GOP debate in 2012, FOX News' Juan Williams asked Tim Pawlenty, "Do you equate the teaching of creationism with the teaching of evolution as the basis for what should be taught for our nation's schools?" Pawlenty replied, "There should be room in the curriculum for study of intelligent design" but that it was up to the local school districts if it should be in a science class or comparative theory class. At the fourth Republican debate held in California, Jon Huntsman addressed the GOP becoming "anti-science" thusly: "Listen, when you make comments that fly in the face of what 98 out of 100 climate scientists have said, when you call into question the science of evolution, all I'm saying is that, in order for the Republican Party to win, we can't run from science. We can't run from mainstream conservative philosophy."


73 Months and Counting

January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting