Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Is Bart Stupak's U.S. House Seat Vulnerable?

Bookmark and Share

Nine-term Democrat has won by more than 32 points in each of the last four election cycles

Michigan Democratic Congressman Bart Stupak's (MI-01) rise to national prominence in recent weeks by first standing firmly against and then ultimately voting for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, may have made him an unofficial Republican target, much like how Democrats reacted nationwide to oust Republican Joe Wilson (SC-02) after his infamous "You lie" outburst during President Obama's Address to Congress last autumn.

With one simple vote, Stupak may have completed a rare political hat trick - falling out of favor with all three sides of the ideological spectrum:

· The left, some of whom were angered by the Congressman drawing abortion so prominently into the health care debate,
· The right, some of whom felt Stupak betrayed the pro-life values he publicly champions,
· And the center, some of whom may see Stupak as a Representative who displayed political weakness by caving to the pressures from the Democratic leadership who were fighting with all their might to get their health care bill through the House.

But even if all this is the case, Stupak's seat will not be an easily won prize for the GOP. Stupak is not even in the top two most vulnerable Democrats from the state of Michigan, and, with over 17 years of service in the U.S. House, the Congressman has a larger margin for error than many, even if indeed his Sunday vote was a political miscalculation.

A Smart Politics analysis of U.S. House election data finds that Stupak's 1st CD of Michigan has been only the 217th most competitive district in the country over the last four election cycles.

Since new district lines were drawn in 2002, Stupak has won by an average margin of 35.8 points, or just slightly more competitive than the 39.2-point average victory margin across all 435 U.S. House districts nationwide.

Stupak has notched at least 65 percent of the vote in each election since 2002 (the 1st CD now encompasses all of Michigan's Upper Peninsula and the northeastern part of the Lower Peninsula).

Since winning his first election in 1992, Stupak has won an average of 62.9 percent of the vote, winning his nine races by an average margin of 27.7 points:

· Stupak won the 1st CD in 1992 by 10.3 points over Republican Philip Ruppe, when John Conyers (who previously represented the 1st) ran instead in the state's 14th CD after redistricting.
· During the Republican Revolution of 1994, Stupak defeated Republican Gil Ziegler by 14.9 points.
· In 1996, Stupak beat GOPer Bob Carr by 43.5 points, topping the 70 percent vote mark for the first and only time in his congressional career.
· In 1998, Stupak defeated Republican Michael McManus by 19.2 points.
· In 2000, the Congressman beat Republican Chuck Yob by 18.0 points.
· In 2002, Stupak beat GOPer Don Hooper by 36.6 points in the first of three straight contests against him.
· In 2004, Stupak defeated Hooper by 32.8 points.
· In 2006, Stupak beat Hooper by 41.4 points, with the Congressman winning more than two-thirds of the vote in his district for the third time.
· In 2008, Stupak defeated Republican Tom Casperson by 32.3 points.

While Republicans and conservatives may be escalating their rhetoric against Stupak, their sights are much more likely set against lower hanging Democratic fruit in the Wolverine State: Democrats Mark Schauer (MI-07) and Gary Peters (MI-09) are freshman congressmen who represent two of the most competitive congressional districts in the nation.

Schauer's 7th CD has been the 22nd most competitive district in the country since 2002, with an average margin of victory of 12.4 points.

Peter's 9th CD has been the 27th most competitive district in the nation during this four election cycle span, with an average victory margin of 13.0 points.

Overall, Stupak's 1st CD has been just the 9th most competitive district in the State of Michigan, behind the 7th (#22), 11th (#25), 9th (#27), 8th (#90), 6th (#153), 4th (#155), 3rd (#190), and 10th (#207) Congressional Districts.

Through December 2009, Stupak had raised $461,220 for the current election cycle, more than 72 percent of which came from PAC money. Democrat and former Charlevoix County Commissioner Connie Saltonstall is lodging a primary challenge against the nine-term Congressman.

Dennis Lennox, drain commissioner in Michigan's Cheboygan County, recently formed an exploratory committee to challenge Stupak this November.

Election Results for Michigan's 1st Congressional District, 1992-2008

Year
Stupak
Republican
Third
MoV
2008
65.0
32.7
2.2
32.3
2006
69.4
28.0
2.6
41.4
2004
65.6
32.8
1.7
32.8
2002
67.7
31.1
1.2
36.6
2000
58.4
40.4
1.2
18.0
1998
58.7
39.5
1.8
19.2
1996
70.7
27.2
2.1
43.5
1994
56.9
42.0
1.1
14.9
1992
53.9
43.6
2.5
10.3
Ave.
62.9
35.3
1.8
27.7
Data compiled from Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Fun Facts about House Democrats Voting 'No' on the Health Care Bill
Next post: The Vanishing President? Obama Public Appearances Down 30 Percent in 2010

4 Comments


  • Well, it's important to realize that in his District having the Right to Life endorsement has definitely helped him in the past. And he won't have that this time...

    He may still win, but now it'll be competitive. The race has been nationalized.

    Today's WSJ talks about how one opponent of Stupak, Dan Benishek has raised a bale of cash in 72 hours. When I became a fan of Dan Benishek on Sunday, I was the 147th fan. He now has just shy of 20,000 fans.

    His opponent is up and running with www.dropstupak.com

  • The fact that his district is solidly democratic may make him more vulnerable to defeat. His primary opponent is staying in the race despite his ultimate 'cooperation' on HCR.


  • The bill clearly states that no federal funds can be used for abortions. Stupak and others were concerned that the community health centers provided for under the bill could still perform abortions. Since the centers would be run by the executive branch which is still governed by the bill and the hyde amendment --it is rather difficult to see how this could happen.
    Still stupak got an amendment passed taking care of this at best remote possibility.

    assume for sake of argument that the republicans would have pledged --add the stupak amendment and return the bill to the senate and we will not filibuster. assume this happened sunday thereby permitting stupak to vote "yes" as he always said he wanted to.

    anyway contend that this would have avoided the present attacks on stupak?

    However after Brown's election, the house had to adopt the Senate bill or face a republican filibuster to get reform passed. The executive order clearly takes care of the almost fictional potential of community health centers performing abortions--since the centers are under the executive branch.


    so the issue is not really abortions but health care reform itself. you want us to believe that lthe brown shirt tea baggers now attacking stupak would supposedly not be doing so if republicans had let his amendment be reintroduced without threat of filibuster - you betcha!

    stupak will only win by 10-15% this time not the usual 2-1 margins

  • A smart politician knows that base turnout is critical for a midterm. If the Democrats didn't pass health care, they were headed for a bloodbath. Besides, majorities of Americans want health care reform; many of those who disapprove of this bill want more, not less.

    The GOP scam is coming to an end. And next, finance reform, where the Democrats can turn populist rage against the Republicans without even trying.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Strange Bedfellows: A Historical Review of Divided US Senate Delegations

    Over the last century, states have been twice as likely to be represented by a single political party in the U.S. Senate than have a split delegation; only Delaware, Iowa, and Illinois have been divided more than half the time.

    Political Crumbs

    Haugh to Reach New Heights

    The North Carolina U.S. Senate race between Democratic incumbent Kay Hagan and Republican Thom Tillis may go down to the wire next Tuesday, but along the way Libertarian nominee Sean Haugh is poised to set a state record for a non-major party candidate. Haugh, who previously won 1.5 percent of the vote in the Tar Heel State's 2002 race, has polled at or above five percent in 10 of the last 12 polls that included his name. The current high water mark for a third party or independent candidate in a North Carolina U.S. Senate election is just 3.3 percent, recorded by Libertarian Robert Emory back in 1992. Only one other candidate has eclipsed the three percent mark - Libertarian Christopher Cole with 3.1 percent in 2008.


    Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

    Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting