Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Kalin Announcement Opens Up Ripe Opportunity in HD 17B for GOP in 2010

Bookmark and Share

Minnesota HD 17B has had a double-digit tilt for Republican candidates against their statewide average across several offices since 2002

When Republican State Representative Kurt Zellers made his debut as House Minority Leader in a press conference late last June, he made clear that one of his top goals, in addition to setting his caucus' agenda and fundraising for the GOP, would be to recruit strong Republican candidates for the 2010 election.

At that time, Zellers did not dismiss the idea of the GOP taking back control of the Minnesota House in 2010, despite facing a 38-seat deficit to the DFL.

The announcement today by 2-term DFLer Jeremy Kalin of North Branch (HD 17B) that he would not seek reelection this November likely just made Zellers' dream one seat closer to reality.

In his announcement, Kalin was self-assured that he could have won over his constituents for a third consecutive election this November ("I'm confident that I would have won their trust for another term"), but said that he is opting instead to focus on his family.

That confidence, however, may have been misguided, given the partisan leanings of Kalin's district, Kalin's own narrow victories during the Democratic tsunamis of 2006 and 2008, and the Republican resurgence being felt nationwide this year.

A Smart Politics analysis of statewide and district elections since redistricting in 2002 finds the voters in HD 17B to have demonstrated a significant GOP tilt vis-à-vis the performance of Republicans statewide.

In fact, Republican candidates for governor, US Senate, and president fared better in HD 17B by double-digit margins than they did statewide in every such contest since 2002.

· George W. Bush and John McCain each carried HD 17B, by 12.5 points in 2004 and 9.6 points in 2008 respectively. Those margins were 16.0 points and 19.8 points better than these GOP candidates did throughout the Gopher State.

· In US Senate contests, Norm Coleman carried 17B in both 2002 (by 18.5 points) and 2008 (by 13.8 points). And while Amy Klobuchar carried the district in 2006, she did so by 11.0 fewer points (9.2) than her statewide victory margin (20.2).

· Tim Pawlenty also dominated the district in both of his election bids - by 23.5 points in 2002 and 11.7 points in 2006. Both exceeded by double digits his statewide margin of victory.

· The GOP tilt in 17B was also demonstrated across elections for the other three constitutional offices in Minnesota, with a larger margin of victory (or narrower margin of loss) for all offices in both the 2002 and 2006 election cycles: for Secretary of State (+8.6 in 2002, +8.3 in 2006), Auditor (+9.3 in 2002, +4.5 in 2006), and Attorney General (+9.6 in 2002, +8.0 in 2006).

· In US House races, Jim Oberstar carried HD 17B by much narrower margins than his 37.4, 33.0, 29.2, and 35.5-point victories across the 8th Congressional District from 2002 through 2008. In 17B, Oberstar won by just 14.6 points in 2002, 14.3 points in 2004, 17.6 points in 2006, and 18.6 points in 2008 - a 17.5-point average tilt for the GOP in HD 17B against the 8th CD generally.

And as for State House races, even with Kalin's victories in 2006 and 2008, there has been a double digit average GOP tilt (+10.3 points) against the statewide average for all 134 house districts across the last four election cycles: +14.7 points in 2002, +12.6 points in 2004, +9.4 points in 2006, +4.5 points in 2008.

Votes cast for GOP candidates for State Senate contests in HD 17B were also 7.8 points (2002) and 7.7 points (2006) better than the statewide average for Republicans across Minnesota's 67 Senate districts.

GOP Tilt in Minnesota HD 17B in Statewide and District Elections by Office, 2002-2008

Office
2002
2004
2006
2008
Average
President
 
16.0
 
19.8
17.9
US Senate
16.8
 
11.0
13.8
13.9
US House*
22.8
18.7
11.6
16.9
17.5
Governor
15.6
 
10.7
 
13.2
Secretary of State
8.6
 
8.3
 
8.5
Auditor
9.3
 
4.5
 
6.9
Attorney General
9.6
 
8.0
 
8.8
State Senate**
7.8
 
7.7
 
7.8
State House**
14.7
12.6
9.4
4.5
10.3
Data reflects the difference between the margin of victory (or margin of loss) for Republican candidates in HD 17B and statewide totals. * For U.S. House contests, the difference is reflected against the district-wide 8th CD margin. ** For State House and State Senate races, the difference is tabulated against the total statewide margins for all 134 and 67 districts respectively. Election data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Bachmann's Narrow Victory in 2008 Did Not Curb Conservative Voting Record in 2009
Next post: 2009 Voting Record of Female Republicans in U.S. House Most Conservative in History

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting