Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Tim Pawlenty Job Approval Rating Hits All-Time Low

Bookmark and Share

Analysis of over 70 polls since 2003 finds Pawlenty's current job approval rating lowest in 7+ years in office

Despite presiding over one of the lowest statewide increases in unemployment in the nation over the past 12 months and hailing from a party that is poised to mount big gains in November, Minnesota Republican Governor Tim Pawlenty has just seen his job approval rating fall to its lowest all-time mark.

The latest numbers, courtesy of a new SurveyUSA poll of 500 Minnesotans, find Pawlenty's job approval rating at just 42 percent, with 52 percent disapproving.

This marks the lowest approval rating ever for Pawlenty, according to a Smart Politics analysis of more than 70 similarly-worded non-partisan public opinion polls dating back to the onset of his first term in office in 2003, including more than 50 polls conducted by SurveyUSA since Spring 2005.

One has to go back four and one-half years to find the previous low-water mark for Pawlenty - a 43 percent approval rating for the Governor in a July 2005 SurveyUSA poll of 600 Minnesotans.

In general, however, Pawlenty has sustained average to good approval ratings throughout his nearly two terms in office - an impressive feat for a Republican governor of a blue state that currently has two Democratic senators, has one of the largest Democratic-controlled state legislatures in the nation, and holds the longest streak in the country of a state voting for Democratic presidential nominees.

However, once the rumors of Pawlenty's national political ambitions really began to take hold in 2009, Pawlenty's approval numbers began to drop and never quite recovered. (Governor Pawlenty announced he would not seek a third term in early June 2009):

· In 2005, Pawlenty's average approval rating across 11 polls was 51.5 percent with a net approval rating of +9.8 points.
· In 2006, while running for reelection, the Governor's average approval rating was 52.5 percent across 22 polls with a net approval rating of +8.5 points.
· In 2007, Pawlenty had an average job approval mark of 55.7 percent across a dozen polls with a net approval rating of +15.7 points.
· In 2008, the Governor averaged an approval rating of 53.9 percent across 12 surveys with a net approval rating of +11.7 points.
· During the first five months of 2009, Pawlenty's average approval mark dropped to 49.4 percent across five polls, but still held a positive net approval rating of +3.9 points.

However, since his announcement that he would not seek a third term in June 2009, the Governor's average approval rating has fallen to 47.0 percent across five polls, with a net approval rating of -2.6 points.

Tim Pawlenty Gubernatorial Job Approval Rating, 2003-2010

Year
Approve
Disapprove
Difference
Polls
2003-2004
54.3
29.5
+24.8
4
2005
51.5
41.7
+9.8
11
2006
52.5
44.0
+8.5
22
2007
55.7
40.0
+15.7
12
2008
53.9
42.2
+11.7
12
2009 (Jan-May)*
49.4
45.8
+3.9
5
June 2009-2010
47.0
49.6
-2.6
5
Average
52.6
42.4
+10.2
71
* Governor Pawlenty announced he would not seek a third term in office in early June 2009. Approval ratings are aggregated from similarly worded public opinion polls by year. Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Pawenty has had difficulty getting good marks from Minnesotans despite presiding over a state which has endured one of the lowest increases in unemployment in the nation over the past year. Since his announcement in June 2009, Minnesota's seasonally adjusted unemployment rate has declined 13.1 percent, falling from 8.4 percent last June to 7.3 percent in January 2010.

Due to Pawlenty's probable national ambitions, the Governor has been under siege from the local media for months in light of his aggressive travel schedule and out-of-state appearances.

While a majority of Minnesotans believe Pawlenty's out of state travels have either had no impact on his ability to govern (40 percent) or has made him a more effective governor (16 percent), Gopher State residents have not yet warmed up to the idea of their Governor running for the presidency in 2012.

A vast majority of those polled by SurveyUSA last week stated they did not think Pawlenty should run for president - by a 63 percent to 28 percent margin.

Moreover, Pawlenty has been hammered by a DFL-dominated legislature that is frequently at odds with the Governor as to how to handle the state's budget crisis, as well as the large flock of DFL gubernatorial hopefuls who seek to succeed Pawlenty next year.

House Speaker and DFL gubernatorial candidate Margaret Anderson Kelliher took a shot at Pawlenty's tenure in office at a media availability just last Friday: "The Governor has not produced a balanced budget for a long time and his legacy, in fact, is going to be a legacy of the $6 to $8 billion deficit."

But with all the traction the GOP is gaining nationwide, and the majority of Gopher State residents seemingly having no problem with his travel schedule, why is Pawlenty struggling to get good marks from his constituents?

The answer to that might lie in a statistical curiosity in the new SurveyUSA poll that suggests there has been a reversal of fortune for the GOP in Minnesota.

Only 23 percent of those 500 Minnesotans polled by SurveyUSA in early March identified themselves as Republicans - the lowest mark in the more than 50 polls conducted by the organization in Minnesota since May 2005.

Meanwhile, 38 percent of respondents identified as independents - the highest mark since December 2005. Thirty-four percent identified as Democrats - tied for the lowest mark they have notched in the Gopher State across 10 polls since December 2008.

These Republican numbers seem a bit strange, considering both the national momentum towards the Republican Party, as well as the fact that the GOP had gained ground on the Democrats in Minnesota last year. Back in July, more Gopher State residents identified as Republicans than at any point in more than four years, at 34 percent.

Republicans approved of Pawlenty's job performance by an 80 to 14 percent margin in the new SurveyUSA poll, with independents approving by a narrower 48 to 46 percent margin.

However, with nearly 50 percent more Democrats than Republicans in the survey sample, and just 10 percent of those Democrats giving the Governor good marks, Pawlenty's overall approval numbers hit their lowest level to date.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: 2009 Voting Record of Female Republicans in U.S. House Most Conservative in History
Next post: Will the DFL Cancel Minnesota's Membership to the 'Lonely Republican Governors Club' in 2010?

1 Comment


  • What the governor has done is roll deficits over into the next year for his entire two terms. For years we've been practicing avoidance. How can we avoid the hard decisions. Call it a shift, a deferral, or call it borrowing. All those deferrals are delayed tax increases. Endless postponement and then he's hoping that those tax increases will happen on someone else's watch.

    What we've got is a governor who focuses on how can he run for president and face up to the real financial challenges of Minnesota. So he'll defer those decisions until he's out of office. Governor Pawlenty illustrates how political ambition becomes a substitute for good governance. I hope that we reward accomplishment and not avoidance.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Gender Equality in the US House: A State-by State Quarter-Century Report Card (1989-2014)

    A study of 5,325 congressional elections finds the number of female U.S. Representatives has more than tripled over the last 25 years, but the rate at which women are elected to the chamber still varies greatly between the states.

    Political Crumbs

    Final Four Has Presidential Approval

    By edging Michigan in the final seconds Sunday, the University of Kentucky guaranteed that one school in the Final Four this year would be located in a state that was not carried by President Barack Obama in 2012. (Connecticut, Florida, and Wisconsin had previously earned Final Four slots over the weekend). Across the 76 Final Fours since 1939, an average of 3.1 schools have been located in states won by the president's ticket during the previous election cycle. All four schools have come from states won by the president 29 times, with the most recent being the 2009 Final Four featuring Connecticut, Michigan State, North Carolina, and Villanova. On 30 occasions three Final Four schools have been located in states won by the president, with two schools 11 times and only one school six times (the most recent being 2012 with Kansas, Kentucky, Louisville, and Ohio State). There has never been a Men's NCAA Division I Final Four in which no schools were located in states carried by the president's ticket.


    Three for the Road

    A new Rasmussen Poll shows Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker in a dead heat with likely 2014 Democratic nominee Mary Burke. Walker is seeking to win his third consecutive election after prevailing in 2012's recall contest. Eight of his predecessors accomplished this feat: Republicans Lucius Fairchild (in 1869), Jeremiah Rusk (1886), Robert La Follette (1904), Emanuel Philipp (1918), John Blaine (1924), Walter Kohler (1954), Warren Knowles (1968), and Tommy Thompson (1994). Three others Badger State governors lost on their third campaign: Democrat George Peck (1894), Progressive Philip La Follette (1938), and Republican Julius Heil (1942). One died in office before having the opportunity to win a third contest (GOPer Walter Goodland in 1947) while another resigned beforehand (Democrat Patrick Lucey in 1977 to become Ambassador to Mexico). Overall Wisconsin gubernatorial incumbents have won 35 of 47 general election contests, or 74.5 percent of the time.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting