Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


PAC Money Comprises Only 5 Percent of Bachmann's Q1 2010 Fundraising

Bookmark and Share

Special interest PAC contributions fall for 4th consecutive quarter as percentage of Bachmann's total fundraising

When it comes to raising money, no member of the Minnesota U.S. House delegation does it quite like Congresswoman Michele Bachmann.

Not only did Bachmann make history by shattering the state fundraising record for the 1st Quarter of an election year (by over 60 percent with $819,616), but she did so almost entirely from support by individual donors - with a scant 5.3 percent coming from special interest PAC money.

The 5.3 percent tally is the lowest percentage of PAC money received by Congresswoman Bachmann since she first received the endorsement by Republicans in the 6th Congressional District back in May 2006 - a percentage that has declined for the fourth consecutive quarter.

By contrast, 83.1 percent of DFLer Collin Peterson's Q1 2010 fundraising came from special interest PAC money, with 54.0 percent for Jim Oberstar, 52.0 percent for Betty McCollum, 39.7 percent for John Kline, 37.0 percent for Erik Paulsen, 27.9 percent for Tim Walz, and 22.5 percent for Keith Ellison.

In the first quarter of 2009, PAC money constituted 19.6 percent of Bachmann's total fundraising, falling to 18.6 percent in Q2 2009, 9.1 percent in Q3 2009, 7.3 percent in Q4 2009, and 5.3 percent in Q1 2010.

In Bachmann's reelection campaign two years ago, PAC money comprised 30.8 percent of Bachmann's total fundraising for the first quarter of 2008 - nearly 2.5 times her Q1 2010 tally in terms of total dollars ($106,624 in Q1 2008 vs. $43,490 in Q1 2010).

Percentage of PAC Contributions to Michele Bachmann's Campaign Since Receiving the GOP Endorsement in Q2 2006

Period
% Individuals
% PACs
Q2 2006
46.6
53.4
Q3 2006
52.7
44.2
Q4 2006
67.0
32.6
Q1 2007
54.7
45.3
Q2 2007
65.8
34.2
Q3 2007
72.7
27.3
Q4 2007
72.8
27.2
Q1 2008
69.2
30.8
Q2 2008
49.4
50.3
Q3 2008
66.1
33.7
Q4 2008
86.7
12.7
Q1 2009
80.4
19.6
Q2 2009
81.4
18.6
Q3 2009
90.9
9.1
Q4 2009
92.7
7.3
Q1 2010
94.7
5.3
FEC data compiled by Smart Politics.

Of course, so long as she continues to receive contributions from individuals at this record pace, Bachmann has little need for PAC money - and can continue to campaign against the 'special interests' in Washington, D.C. with (comparatively) cleaner hands than most members of Congress.

In fact, individual donations to Bachmann's campaign are now so strong that she nearly outraised every other member of the Minnesota U.S. House delegation combined.

The Congresswoman tallied $776,126 in itemized and unitemized funds from individuals compared to a combined $832,249 for Tim Walz, John Kline, Erik Paulsen, Betty McCollum, Keith Ellison, Collin Peterson, and Jim Oberstar (seven Representatives with 79 years of combined service in Congress).

By contrast, Bachmann ranked next to last among the Gopher State's eight U.S. Representatives in terms of PAC receipts received last quarter - ahead of only Keith Ellison. Bachmann also ranks next to last in PAC money contributions for the election cycle to date.

PAC Dollars to Minnesota's U.S. House Delegation, January 2009 - March 2010

Rank
Representative
PAC Dollars
Percent
1
Jim Oberstar
$576,386
19.5
2
Collin Peterson
$511,800
17.3
3
Erik Paulsen
$504,051
17.1
4
Tim Walz
$375,920
12.7
5
John Kline
$334,893
11.3
6
Betty McCollum
$243,182
8.2
7
Michele Bachmann
$232,275
7.9
8
Keith Ellison
$173,010
5.9
FEC data compiled by Smart Politics.

Bachmann's two DFL rivals - Maureen Reed and Party-endorsed Tarryl Clark - also both rely largely on non-PAC money in their fundraising campaigns. PAC contributions constituted 7.4 percent of Clark's Q1 2010 tally ($37,550) and just 1.5 percent of Reed's ($3,000).

However, since launching their campaigns last year, Clark has received more than 22 times as much money from PACs as her DFL primary opponent: PACs have contributed $138,700 to Clark (12.5 percent of her net receipts) compared to just $6,250 for Reed (0.8 percent).

At this point in her inaugural Congressional campaign in 2006, Bachmann had raised only $6,000 in PAC funds.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Is the Democratic Party 'Overrepresented' in the U.S. House?
Next post: Still thinking about running for the U.S. Senate? You're Too Late

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting