Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Will the GOP Sweep North and South Dakota's U.S. House Seats?

Bookmark and Share

Republicans have never carried both single-member at-large districts in the same election cycle; Democrats have won 25 of 29 U.S. House contests in the Dakotas since 1982

For more than a generation, the Democratic Party has dominated Congressional elections in North and South Dakota, despite the Republican Party having a stronghold over the Democrats in state politics and presidential contests.

Since 1982, Democrats have won 41 of 49 general and special election U.S. Senate and U.S. House contests in the Dakotas.

Democrats have won 16 of 20 general and special U.S. Senate contests in North Dakota (10 of 11) and South Dakota (6 of 9). Democrats have also won 25 of 29 general and special elections for each state's at-large House seats since 1982: 14 of 14 in North Dakota and 11 of 15 in South Dakota.

However, as the current election cycle inches closer toward November 2nd, the outlook is looking more and more grim for Upper Midwestern Democrats.

In the U.S. Senate, the North Dakota Democratic Non Partisan League effectively conceded their Class III seat held by Byron Dorgan once he announced his retirement in January of this year. Popular Republican Governor John Hoeven is outpolling Democratic State Senator Tracy Potter by a 2:1 margin.

Meanwhile, South Dakota Democrats literally rose the white flag, surrendering any hope of taking back Tom Daschle's Senate seat, when they failed to field a candidate against John Thune for the first time in state history.

And now, with new rounds of polling by Rasmussen released on Monday, Democrats have more reason to believe that their two at-large U.S. House seats held by Stephanie Herseth Sandlin and Earl Pomeroy might be in jeopardy in 2010 as well.

Rasmussen's poll of 500 likely voters in North Dakota on April 20th finds former Republican State House Majority Leader Rick Berg holding a four-point advantage over 9-term incumbent Pomeroy at 49 to 45 percent - the third consecutive month with Berg on top.

In South Dakota, a Rasmussen survey of 500 likely voters on April 21st finds Herseth Sandlin leading one of her likely GOP opponents, Secretary of State Chris Nelson, by just a 45 to 41 percent margin.

Should both of these once very popular Democratic incumbents lose this November, it would be the first time the Republican Party will have held each single-member at-large U.S. House seat from the Dakotas at the same time.

(South Dakota's U.S. House delegation was reduced to one at-large member in 1982 while North Dakota has been represented by a single at-large member since 1972).

Since 1982, Democrats have thoroughly dominated the GOP in U.S. House contests, winning 10 of 14 general election contests (plus a 2002 special election) in South Dakota. Herseth Sandlin, and her Democratic predecessors Tim Johnson and Tom Daschle, have won these 10 general election at-large contests by an average of 26.3 points.

Democrats have also won 15 consecutive at-large races in North Dakota dating back to 1980 - the last nine by Pomeroy and the preceding six by Dorgan. Pomeroy and Dorgan won these contests by an average of 23.6 points (a 12.6-point average MoV for Pomeroy and 40.1 points for Dorgan).

The good news for Dakota Democrats, however, is the fundraising advantage Pomeroy and Herseth Sandlin currently hold over their GOP hopefuls at this early stage in their respective campaigns.

Through the first quarter of 2010, Herseth Sandlin has raised $702,227 for the cycle to date and had nearly $450,000 cash on hand - over $100,000 more cash on hand than the cumulative total for her three GOP challengers: Blake Curd ($185,976), Kristi Noem ($92,322), and Chris Nelson ($43,986).

Pomeroy, meanwhile, has over $1.6 million cash on hand through March, or nearly five times the amount of GOPer Rick Berg ($344,437).

Whether or not their Blue Dog Democratic credentials will provide enough armor to protect Pomeroy and Herseth Sandlin in 2010 from the onslaught of GOP arrows targeting them as part of the liberal Democratic machine in D.C. remains to be seen.

However, a pullback toward the Republican Party in Congressional races to some degree is almost assured in this pair of conservative Upper Midwestern states.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Will Margaret Anderson Kelliher Break the Upper Midwestern Glass Ceiling?
Next post: Reapportionment Winners and Losers Through the Years

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

No Free Passes: States With 2 Major Party Candidates in Every US House Race

Indiana has now placed candidates from both major parties on the ballot in a nation-best 189 consecutive U.S. House races, with New Hampshire, Minnesota, Idaho, and Montana also north of 100 in a row.

Political Crumbs

Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


An Idaho Six Pack

Two-term Idaho Republican Governor Butch Otter only polled at 39 percent in a recent PPP survey of the state's 2014 race - just four points ahead of Democratic businessman A.J. Balukoff. Otter's low numbers reflect his own struggles as a candidate (witness his weak primary win against State Senator Russ Fulcher) combined with the opportunity for disgruntled Idahoans to cast their votes for one of four third party and independent candidates, who collectively received the support of 12 percent of likely voters: Libertarian John Bujak, the Constitution Party's Steve Pankey, and independents Jill Humble and Pro-Life (aka Marvin Richardson). The six candidate options in a gubernatorial race sets an all-time record in the Gem State across the 46 elections conducted since statehood. The previous high water mark of five candidates was reached in seven previous cycles: 1902, 1904, 1908, 1912, 1914, 1966, and 2010.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting