Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


How Competitive Are U.S. House Special Elections?

Bookmark and Share

Special elections are 17.4 points more competitive than general election contests; special election seats are also 4 times more likely to switch parties

Since the 2008 general election there have already been seven special elections to the U.S. House with three slated for the month of May including Tuesday evening's contest in the 9th CD of Georgia.

Special elections are frequently marred by low voter turnout, and, with the exception of the special election contest in New York's 23rd CD last November, most seem to fly under the national radar.

However, a Smart Politics analysis of the nearly three-dozen special election contests that have been conducted since new district lines went into effect in 2002 finds that special elections are nearly 20 points more competitive than general election contests for those districts, provide a much higher percentage of 'nail-biter' finishes, and are four times more likely to see a change in party control of the district than general election contests.

Smart Politics examined the margin of victories for the 32 special elections that have been conducted from 2002 through the special election in Florida's 19th CD last month and compared them to the average margin of victory for those respective districts in general election contests since 2002.

The average margin of victory in general election races for these 32 districts was 43.3 points since redistricting in 2002. The average margin of victory in special election races, however, was 25.9 points, or 17.4 points more competitive.

For example, the average victory margin in general elections for New York's 20th CD since 2002 has been 27.8 points. The March 31, 2009 contest won by Democrat Scott Murphy to replace Kirsten Gillibrand, however, was decided by just 0.5 points, or 27.3 points more competitive.

Or take California's 10th CD, overshadowed by the drama surrounding New York's 23rd CD last November. California CD-10 has had an average victory margin of 37.5 points across the last four general elections, but Democrat John Garamendi won by just 10.0 points in the recent special election, or a 27.5-point more competitive decision.

Of course, one of the reasons why special election races are more competitive than general election races is that, by definition, they are open seat contests.

Smart Politics therefore also examined the difference between the margin of victory for the nearly 160 open seat general election races since 2002, and the margin of victory for those districts with incumbents on the ballot.

Districts with open seats in general election races had an average victory margin of 21.5 points. The average margin of victory for these same U.S. House districts with incumbents on the ballot since 2002 has been 36.5 points, or a 15.0-point differential.

Special election races have therefore seen a greater move towards competitive races (with a 17.4-point narrower average margin of victory) than open seat general election contests (with a 15.0-point narrower average margin of victory).

Special elections have also provided much more dramatic races upon examining the percentage of contests decided by less than 10 points:

· Since 2002, 3 in 8 special elections to the U.S. House (12 of 32, 37.5 percent) have been decided by less than 10 points.
· Less than 3 in 10 open general election contests (46 of 157, 29.2 percent) have been decided by less than 10 points.
· And less than 1 in 10 of all general election races (169 of 1,740, 9.7 percent) have been won by less than 10 points.

U.S. House Races Decided by Less than 10 Points Since 2002 by Type of Election

Election type
< 10 points
Percent
Special
12 of 32
37.5
Open general
46 of 157
29.2
All general
169 of 1,740
9.7
Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Special elections are also much more likely to shake up the composition of the U.S. House.

Since 2002, U.S. House seats on the ballot in special election contests are four times more likely to see the seat switch parties (18.8 percent, 6 of 32) than seats on the ballot in general election contests (4.7 percent, 82 of 1,740).

Open seat general election contests have been even more likely to switch parties (40 of 146 races since 2002, or 27.4 percent). However, this is partially explained by the fact that these districts have begun with a baseline that is seven points more competitive than those districts in which special elections have happened to occur.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Is the 'S' Word Scaring People Away from the 'L' Word? (The Vanishing Liberal in Minnesota)
Next post: History Suggests Kagan Confirmation Process Will Be Rockier than Sotomayor's

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Kevin McCarthy Becomes Least Tenured Floor Leader in US House History

At less than four terms, McCarthy has served 423 fewer days in the chamber than any floor leader in U.S. House history and almost 10 years less than the average leader.

Political Crumbs

The Second Time Around

Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


How Are the Plurality Winners Doing?

Nearly 40 percent of plurality winners of U.S. Senate elections lose their seat in the next election cycle. Will that happen to any of the three such incumbents on the ballot in 2014? Recent polling suggests Democrats Al Franken of Minnesota, Mark Begich of Alaska, and Jeff Merkley of Oregon all currently have an advantage over their nominated/frontrunning GOP opponents, but each is flirting with plurality support once again. Franken led endorsed GOPer Mike McFadden 48 to 42 percent in a new SurveyUSA poll while the polling group showed Merkley with a 50 to 32 percent advantage over Monica Wehby. Begich led each of the three major GOP candidates in last month's PPP survey: 42 to 37 percent over Daniel Sullivan, 41 to 33 percent over Mead Treadwell, and 43 to 27 percent over Joe Miller.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting