Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


How Competitive Are U.S. House Special Elections?

Bookmark and Share

Special elections are 17.4 points more competitive than general election contests; special election seats are also 4 times more likely to switch parties

Since the 2008 general election there have already been seven special elections to the U.S. House with three slated for the month of May including Tuesday evening's contest in the 9th CD of Georgia.

Special elections are frequently marred by low voter turnout, and, with the exception of the special election contest in New York's 23rd CD last November, most seem to fly under the national radar.

However, a Smart Politics analysis of the nearly three-dozen special election contests that have been conducted since new district lines went into effect in 2002 finds that special elections are nearly 20 points more competitive than general election contests for those districts, provide a much higher percentage of 'nail-biter' finishes, and are four times more likely to see a change in party control of the district than general election contests.

Smart Politics examined the margin of victories for the 32 special elections that have been conducted from 2002 through the special election in Florida's 19th CD last month and compared them to the average margin of victory for those respective districts in general election contests since 2002.

The average margin of victory in general election races for these 32 districts was 43.3 points since redistricting in 2002. The average margin of victory in special election races, however, was 25.9 points, or 17.4 points more competitive.

For example, the average victory margin in general elections for New York's 20th CD since 2002 has been 27.8 points. The March 31, 2009 contest won by Democrat Scott Murphy to replace Kirsten Gillibrand, however, was decided by just 0.5 points, or 27.3 points more competitive.

Or take California's 10th CD, overshadowed by the drama surrounding New York's 23rd CD last November. California CD-10 has had an average victory margin of 37.5 points across the last four general elections, but Democrat John Garamendi won by just 10.0 points in the recent special election, or a 27.5-point more competitive decision.

Of course, one of the reasons why special election races are more competitive than general election races is that, by definition, they are open seat contests.

Smart Politics therefore also examined the difference between the margin of victory for the nearly 160 open seat general election races since 2002, and the margin of victory for those districts with incumbents on the ballot.

Districts with open seats in general election races had an average victory margin of 21.5 points. The average margin of victory for these same U.S. House districts with incumbents on the ballot since 2002 has been 36.5 points, or a 15.0-point differential.

Special election races have therefore seen a greater move towards competitive races (with a 17.4-point narrower average margin of victory) than open seat general election contests (with a 15.0-point narrower average margin of victory).

Special elections have also provided much more dramatic races upon examining the percentage of contests decided by less than 10 points:

· Since 2002, 3 in 8 special elections to the U.S. House (12 of 32, 37.5 percent) have been decided by less than 10 points.
· Less than 3 in 10 open general election contests (46 of 157, 29.2 percent) have been decided by less than 10 points.
· And less than 1 in 10 of all general election races (169 of 1,740, 9.7 percent) have been won by less than 10 points.

U.S. House Races Decided by Less than 10 Points Since 2002 by Type of Election

Election type
< 10 points
Percent
Special
12 of 32
37.5
Open general
46 of 157
29.2
All general
169 of 1,740
9.7
Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Special elections are also much more likely to shake up the composition of the U.S. House.

Since 2002, U.S. House seats on the ballot in special election contests are four times more likely to see the seat switch parties (18.8 percent, 6 of 32) than seats on the ballot in general election contests (4.7 percent, 82 of 1,740).

Open seat general election contests have been even more likely to switch parties (40 of 146 races since 2002, or 27.4 percent). However, this is partially explained by the fact that these districts have begun with a baseline that is seven points more competitive than those districts in which special elections have happened to occur.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Is the 'S' Word Scaring People Away from the 'L' Word? (The Vanishing Liberal in Minnesota)
Next post: History Suggests Kagan Confirmation Process Will Be Rockier than Sotomayor's

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting