Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Pawlenty Still Shedding Support for Presidential Candidacy in Home State

Bookmark and Share

Statewide support for 'President Pawlenty' in Minnesota reaches all-time low of 35 percent while his gubernatorial approval rating remains solid

A new Rasmussen poll of 500 likely voters in Minnesota delivers good news and bad news to outgoing Republican Governor Tim Pawlenty.

On the plus side, Pawlenty emerged from another bloody legislative session, a state Supreme Court decision that overturned his controversial 2009 unallotment, criticism by political opponents and the media for his frequent out-of-state trips, and a looming budget deficit of several billion dollars in the next biennium with good approval ratings.

With 52 percent of Minnesotans believing Pawlenty is doing an 'excellent' or 'good' job, Pawlenty has sustained a 50+ percent approval rating for each of the three Rasmussen polls conducted this year (coming in at 50 percent in March and 53 percent in April).

In fact, the Governor's Rasmussen approval ratings across 2009 and the first half of 2010 have been consistently higher than in 2008 - with his 'excellent' and 'good' marks averaging 52.8 percent over the last year and a half, compared to just 47.3 percent in 2008.

However, with nearly a year gone by since Pawlenty's announcement that he would not seek a third term in office, Gopher State residents still have not warmed up to the idea of their governor running for president.

The new Rasmussen poll finds that only 35 percent of Minnesotans would vote for Pawlenty if he won the Republican nomination for president - the lowest level across the four polls Rasmussen has conducted on this issue since last fall.

Back in November 2009, 42 percent of Gopher State residents stated they would vote for Pawlenty under such a scenario. That number dropped to 37 and 38 percent in January and March respectively, and then to 35 percent in May.

Forty-nine percent of Minnesotans said they would not vote for him.

The faltering support for a Pawlenty presidential campaign in his home state is curious in light of the governor's reasonable approval ratings and the fact that Republican party identification is currently at a five-year high in Minnesota, with Republicans outnumbering Democrats for the first time since October of 2005.

This lack of enthusiasm for a potential presidential run should raise at least a yellow flag for Pawlenty, as history has demonstrated that carrying a home state is a necessary condition, though obviously not a sufficient condition, to winning the presidency.

A Smart Politics analysis of the 56 presidential elections since 1789 found that all but two presidents carried their home state en route to victory.

The only two elected presidents who did not win their home states were James Polk (1844, Tennessee) and Woodrow Wilson (1916, New Jersey).

Perhaps Pawlenty is counting on a stronger base of support for his presidential campaign somewhere south of the border - such as in Iowa.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: DFL Goal to Defeat Bachmann Faces Significant Historical Challenges
Next post: Out with the Old and In with the Older: Ex-Governors Have Historically Good Odds in Comeback Bids

1 Comment


  • The governor is a political opportunist of the highest order.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting