Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Republicans Outnumber Democrats in Minnesota for First Time Since 2005

Bookmark and Share

Study of nearly 70 SurveyUSA polls finds GOP holding first party ID advantage since October 2005; percentage of Minnesotans identifying as Republicans at highest level ever recorded by polling organization

The first SurveyUSA poll of the Minnesota gubernatorial horserace in 2010 turned heads this weekend with Republican Party endorsee Tom Emmer jumping out of the gate with eight-point leads over DFL- endorsed Margaret Anderson Kelliher and former DFL U.S. Senator Mark Dayton, and an 11-point lead over former DFL legislator Matt Entenza.

Beneath the headline, however, is perhaps an even more telling story - Republicans have now eclipsed Democrats in party identification for the first time in the Gopher State since 2005.

A Smart Politics analysis of 68 SurveyUSA polls conducted since May 2005 finds that the 36 to 35 percent advantage Republicans hold over Democrats in the new poll (conducted May 3-5 of 588 likely voters) is the first time the GOP has held such an advantage in SurveyUSA polling since October 2005 (when the GOP held a 29 to 28 percent advantage and 41 percent identifying as independents).

No other polling firm has surveyed Minnesotans more than SurveyUSA during this span.

The 36 percent level reached by Minnesota Republicans is also the largest ever notched by the GOP in the Gopher State across the nearly 70 polls conducted by SurveyUSA during these five years (polls which have alternately sampled adults, registered voters, and likely voters).

The previous high recorded for the Republican Party by SurveyUSA in Minnesota was 35 percent in the organization's inaugural monthly tracking poll in May 2005.

The GOP had previously eclipsed the 30 percent mark in party ID only 12 times during this five-year stretch and just 5 times out of the 48 polls conducted in Minnesota since 2007.

Republican Party ID had slipped to 23 percent in early March of this year - three weeks before the high profile health care vote in Washington D.C.

The record highs reached by the Republican Party in the new SurveyUSA poll give pause to one of the themes running through the media this election season - that the politically disgruntled American public is equally disgusted with both major parties.

If this were to be true, it would surely be a boon to newly endorsed Independence Party candidate Tom Horner. Horner polled at 9 and 10 percent in the horserace matchups against Emmer and the three DFL hopefuls.

However, the new SurveyUSA poll finds only 24 percent of Minnesotans identifying as a political independents.

The percentage of Minnesotans identifying as independents has gradually been on the decline, according to a Smart Politics analysis of SurveyUSA data.

Independents comprised a plurality of 36.3 percent of Minnesotans across eight polls in 2005, dropping to 28.5 percent across 12 polls in 2006, 28.0 percent across 16 polls in 2007, 25.7 percent across 20 polls in 2008, and 25.7 percent across 10 polls in 2009.

Note: The margin of error of the new SurveyUSA poll is +/- 4.1 points. Although the one-point advantage for the GOP is statistically insignificant, the larger point of this report is that the Republican Party has rarely seen numbers even within the margin of error of the Democratic Party's lead during the past half-decade in the Gopher State.

The Democratic Party has enjoyed yearly average advantages over the GOP in Minnesota of 6.3 points in 2006, 10.0 points in 2007, 9.4 points in 2008, and 10.4 points in 2009.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: David Obey's Exit and the Badger State Congressmen Who Left Before Him
Next post: Is the 'S' Word Scaring People Away from the 'L' Word? (The Vanishing Liberal in Minnesota)

4 Comments


  • That you would use Survey USA's polling (which has a fairly poor record at forcasting MN elections) to make such a statement really stands out as a laughable "study". Other analysis done by your site has been much more valid in the past, I'd try to stick to that.

  • > That you would use Survey USA's polling (which has a fairly
    > poor record at forcasting MN elections) to make such a
    > statement really stands out as a laughable "study".

    Actually SurveyUSA's track record is very good in MN.

    Look at their final polls shortly conducted shortly before Election Day for US House contests:

    * Kline 54, Rowley 36 in 2006 (Result: Kline 56, Rowley 40)
    * Bachmann 49, Wetterling 42 in 2006 (Result: Bachmann 50, Wetterling 42)
    * Ellison 49, Fine 24, Lee 22 in 2006 (Result: Ellison 55, Fine 21, Lee 21)
    * Bachmann 46, Tinklenberg 45 in 2008 (Result: Bachmann 46, Tinklenberg 43)
    * Paulsen 46, Madia 41 in 2008 (Result: Paulsen 48, Madia 41)

    For Governor:
    * Pawlenty 45, Hatch 45 in 2006 (Result: Pawlenty 47, Hatch 46)

    For US Senate:
    * Klobuchar 56, Kennedy 40 in 2006 (Result: Klobuchar 58, Kennedy 38)
    * Coleman 44, Franken 39, Barkley 16 in 2008 (Result: Franken 42, Coleman 42, Barkley 15)

    So, only the US Senate 2008 was a bit off.

  • Forced Party ID-

    Hey Eric, on the independent id did you take into account that pollsters are once again more aggressively forcing leaning (and they don't always report the leaning splits)?Just curious. I don't doubt that the survey is accurate at this point in time...but you are making longitudinal observations and I wonder if they are comparable.

    Peter

  • > on the independent id did you take into account that pollsters
    > are once again more aggressively forcing leaning

    I agree that pollsters frequently try to force 'leaners' into one of the two major party camps. However, the question here is whether or not SurveyUSA has changed its methodology -- and I have not seen any evidence that they have.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Kevin McCarthy Becomes Least Tenured Floor Leader in US House History

    At less than four terms, McCarthy has served 423 fewer days in the chamber than any floor leader in U.S. House history and almost 10 years less than the average leader.

    Political Crumbs

    The Second Time Around

    Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


    How Are the Plurality Winners Doing?

    Nearly 40 percent of plurality winners of U.S. Senate elections lose their seat in the next election cycle. Will that happen to any of the three such incumbents on the ballot in 2014? Recent polling suggests Democrats Al Franken of Minnesota, Mark Begich of Alaska, and Jeff Merkley of Oregon all currently have an advantage over their nominated/frontrunning GOP opponents, but each is flirting with plurality support once again. Franken led endorsed GOPer Mike McFadden 48 to 42 percent in a new SurveyUSA poll while the polling group showed Merkley with a 50 to 32 percent advantage over Monica Wehby. Begich led each of the three major GOP candidates in last month's PPP survey: 42 to 37 percent over Daniel Sullivan, 41 to 33 percent over Mead Treadwell, and 43 to 27 percent over Joe Miller.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting