Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Republicans Outnumber Democrats in Minnesota for First Time Since 2005

Bookmark and Share

Study of nearly 70 SurveyUSA polls finds GOP holding first party ID advantage since October 2005; percentage of Minnesotans identifying as Republicans at highest level ever recorded by polling organization

The first SurveyUSA poll of the Minnesota gubernatorial horserace in 2010 turned heads this weekend with Republican Party endorsee Tom Emmer jumping out of the gate with eight-point leads over DFL- endorsed Margaret Anderson Kelliher and former DFL U.S. Senator Mark Dayton, and an 11-point lead over former DFL legislator Matt Entenza.

Beneath the headline, however, is perhaps an even more telling story - Republicans have now eclipsed Democrats in party identification for the first time in the Gopher State since 2005.

A Smart Politics analysis of 68 SurveyUSA polls conducted since May 2005 finds that the 36 to 35 percent advantage Republicans hold over Democrats in the new poll (conducted May 3-5 of 588 likely voters) is the first time the GOP has held such an advantage in SurveyUSA polling since October 2005 (when the GOP held a 29 to 28 percent advantage and 41 percent identifying as independents).

No other polling firm has surveyed Minnesotans more than SurveyUSA during this span.

The 36 percent level reached by Minnesota Republicans is also the largest ever notched by the GOP in the Gopher State across the nearly 70 polls conducted by SurveyUSA during these five years (polls which have alternately sampled adults, registered voters, and likely voters).

The previous high recorded for the Republican Party by SurveyUSA in Minnesota was 35 percent in the organization's inaugural monthly tracking poll in May 2005.

The GOP had previously eclipsed the 30 percent mark in party ID only 12 times during this five-year stretch and just 5 times out of the 48 polls conducted in Minnesota since 2007.

Republican Party ID had slipped to 23 percent in early March of this year - three weeks before the high profile health care vote in Washington D.C.

The record highs reached by the Republican Party in the new SurveyUSA poll give pause to one of the themes running through the media this election season - that the politically disgruntled American public is equally disgusted with both major parties.

If this were to be true, it would surely be a boon to newly endorsed Independence Party candidate Tom Horner. Horner polled at 9 and 10 percent in the horserace matchups against Emmer and the three DFL hopefuls.

However, the new SurveyUSA poll finds only 24 percent of Minnesotans identifying as a political independents.

The percentage of Minnesotans identifying as independents has gradually been on the decline, according to a Smart Politics analysis of SurveyUSA data.

Independents comprised a plurality of 36.3 percent of Minnesotans across eight polls in 2005, dropping to 28.5 percent across 12 polls in 2006, 28.0 percent across 16 polls in 2007, 25.7 percent across 20 polls in 2008, and 25.7 percent across 10 polls in 2009.

Note: The margin of error of the new SurveyUSA poll is +/- 4.1 points. Although the one-point advantage for the GOP is statistically insignificant, the larger point of this report is that the Republican Party has rarely seen numbers even within the margin of error of the Democratic Party's lead during the past half-decade in the Gopher State.

The Democratic Party has enjoyed yearly average advantages over the GOP in Minnesota of 6.3 points in 2006, 10.0 points in 2007, 9.4 points in 2008, and 10.4 points in 2009.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: David Obey's Exit and the Badger State Congressmen Who Left Before Him
Next post: Is the 'S' Word Scaring People Away from the 'L' Word? (The Vanishing Liberal in Minnesota)

4 Comments


  • That you would use Survey USA's polling (which has a fairly poor record at forcasting MN elections) to make such a statement really stands out as a laughable "study". Other analysis done by your site has been much more valid in the past, I'd try to stick to that.

  • > That you would use Survey USA's polling (which has a fairly
    > poor record at forcasting MN elections) to make such a
    > statement really stands out as a laughable "study".

    Actually SurveyUSA's track record is very good in MN.

    Look at their final polls shortly conducted shortly before Election Day for US House contests:

    * Kline 54, Rowley 36 in 2006 (Result: Kline 56, Rowley 40)
    * Bachmann 49, Wetterling 42 in 2006 (Result: Bachmann 50, Wetterling 42)
    * Ellison 49, Fine 24, Lee 22 in 2006 (Result: Ellison 55, Fine 21, Lee 21)
    * Bachmann 46, Tinklenberg 45 in 2008 (Result: Bachmann 46, Tinklenberg 43)
    * Paulsen 46, Madia 41 in 2008 (Result: Paulsen 48, Madia 41)

    For Governor:
    * Pawlenty 45, Hatch 45 in 2006 (Result: Pawlenty 47, Hatch 46)

    For US Senate:
    * Klobuchar 56, Kennedy 40 in 2006 (Result: Klobuchar 58, Kennedy 38)
    * Coleman 44, Franken 39, Barkley 16 in 2008 (Result: Franken 42, Coleman 42, Barkley 15)

    So, only the US Senate 2008 was a bit off.

  • Forced Party ID-

    Hey Eric, on the independent id did you take into account that pollsters are once again more aggressively forcing leaning (and they don't always report the leaning splits)?Just curious. I don't doubt that the survey is accurate at this point in time...but you are making longitudinal observations and I wonder if they are comparable.

    Peter

  • > on the independent id did you take into account that pollsters
    > are once again more aggressively forcing leaning

    I agree that pollsters frequently try to force 'leaners' into one of the two major party camps. However, the question here is whether or not SurveyUSA has changed its methodology -- and I have not seen any evidence that they have.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting