Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Unfamiliar Faces: 2010 Likely to Set Mark for Fewest U.S. House Incumbents on the Ballot this Decade

Bookmark and Share

Seats without incumbents on the ballot are 56 percent more likely to be Republican than Democratic since 2002

When 14-term Democratic Congressman Alan Mollohan (WV-01) was defeated by primary challenger Mike Oliverio last Tuesday, his district was added to an increasingly long list of districts in which the incumbent will not be on the ballot in November's general election.

Mollohan's ousting means there will be at least 38 congressional districts without incumbents in the general election - already the second highest number since new district lines and reapportionment took effect in 2002 (39) with more incumbents still likely to fall (more than 40 states have not yet had their primaries as of this writing).

A Smart Politics analysis of congressional elections over the past decade finds that incumbents have been left off the general election ballot due to retirement from their seats (171), defeat in the primary (11), or expulsion (1) in an average of 8.4 percent of U.S. House districts since 2002 (183 out of 2,175 contests).

Overall, 39 districts were incumbent-free in 2002 (excluding 12 newly created districts after reapportionment), with 37 in 2004, 33 in 2006, 36 in 2008, and 38 to date in 2010.

Republican incumbents have been much more likely to fade away - with 10.5 percent of GOP districts (111 of 1,059 contests) running without an incumbent since 2002. Only 6.4 percent of Democratic incumbents (71 of 1,110) have done so during the last five election cycles.

Overall, seats without incumbents on the ballot have therefore been 56 percent more likely to be Republican than Democratic since 2002.

Republicans have also not sought their U.S. House seat due to retirement (or seeking higher office) in much higher numbers than Democrats.

Of the 171 instances in which a seat was open (or vacant) on Election Day due to the incumbent's decision to step aside from his or her seat, 108 districts (63.2 percent) were held by Republicans, with just 62 (36.3 percent) by Democrats and 1 independent.

And although many D.C. analysts are projecting a Republican tsunami in 2010, one distinguishing feature of this year's congressional elections is that Democrats are not running for the hills quite like the GOP did when the Democratic tsunamis hit in 2006 and 2008.

In 2006 and 2008, 10.7 percent of Republican incumbents (46 of 431 seats) did not seek reelection. However, only 6.6 percent of Democratic incumbents (17 of 257) have voluntarily stepped aside from their seats during the 2010 cycle.

Number of Districts by Year and Party in Which Incumbents Voluntarily Did Not Seek Reelection, 2002-2010

Party
2002*
2004**
2006
2008
2010
Total
Republican
22
19
21
26
20
105
Democrat
13
17
9
6
17
62
Independent
0
0
1
0
0
1
Total
35
36
31
32
37
168
* Excludes 12 new districts that were created after reapportionment. ** Includes districts in which (Democratic) incumbents were drawn into different districts after the Texas redistricting plan of 2003. Data compiled by Smart Politics.

And while the instances of intra-party ouster are extremely rare in Congressional elections, Democratic incumbents have been defeated in primaries eight times since 2002 (including Mollohan's last week), compared to just three for the GOP.

And where are these districts located in which incumbents are retiring or getting defeated in primaries?

An examination as to where these incumbent-free districts have popped up over the past decade reveals that some states have had a much higher exodus rate than others.

· New Mexico leads the way with incumbents not appearing on the general election ballot in 26.7 percent of U.S. House races since 2002 (4 of 15, including all three in 2008).

· Tied for second, incumbents have failed to appear on the ballot in Delaware, Maine, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, and Wyoming in 20 percent of U.S. House contests.

· Three states with seven seats in Congress - Alabama, Colorado, and Louisiana - have also shed incumbents at more than twice the rate of the national average (17.1 percent).

· Four states, meanwhile, have had incumbents on the ballot in each general election since 2002: Connecticut and three states with at-large Representatives (Alaska, Montana, and North Dakota).

· Florida, which has the fourth most congressional districts in the nation with 25, has had the largest number of districts in general election contests without incumbents with 14, followed by Texas (11), Tennessee (9), Ohio (9), California (9), Georgia (8), and New York (8).

Of course, these numbers are subject to change if more incumbents - Democratic or Republican - share the same fate as Alan Mollohan in the coming months.

Number of Districts in Which Incumbents Did Not Appear on the General Election Ballot by State, 2002-2010

State
’02
’04
’06
’08
’10
Total
%
New Mexico
1
0
0
3
0
4
26.7
Delaware
0
0
0
0
1
1
20.0
Maine
1
0
0
1
0
2
20.0
New Hampshire
1
0
0
0
1
2
20.0
Oklahoma
2
1
1
0
1
5
20.0
South Dakota
1
0
0
0
0
1
20.0
Tennessee
3
0
2
1
3
9
20.0
Vermont
0
0
1
0
0
1
20.0
Wyoming
0
0
0
1
0
1
20.0
Alabama
3
0
0
2
1
6
17.1
Colorado
1
1
2
2
0
6
17.1
Louisiana
1
3
0
1
1
6
17.1
Arkansas
0
0
0
0
3
3
15.0
Kansas
0
0
0
0
3
3
15.0
Nebraska
0
1
1
0
0
2
13.3
South Carolina
1
1
0
0
2
4
13.3
Utah
1
0
0
1
0
2
13.3
Georgia
3
3
1
0
1
8
12.3
Florida
2
2
4
1
5
14
11.2
Arizona
1
0
1
1
1
4
10.0
Hawaii
0
0
1
0
0
1
10.0
Idaho
0
0
1
0
0
1
10.0
Maryland
1
0
1
2
0
4
10.0
Mississippi
1
0
0
1
0
2
10.0
Ohio
2
0
4
3
0
9
10.0
Rhode Island
0
0
0
0
1
1
10.0
Michigan
2
1
1
0
3
7
9.3
Missouri
0
2
0
1
1
4
8.9
Iowa
1
0
1
0
0
2
8.0
Minnesota
0
0
2
1
0
3
7.5
Illinois
1
1
2
2
1
7
7.4
Pennsylvania
2
3
0
1
1
7
7.4
Texas
2
8
1
0
0
11
6.9
Indiana
1
0
0
0
2
3
6.7
Kentucky
0
1
0
1
0
2
6.7
Nevada
0
0
1
0
0
1
6.7
Washington
0
2
0
0
1
3
6.7
West Virginia
0
0
0
0
1
1
6.7
New Jersey
1
0
1
2
0
4
6.2
New York
0
2
2
4
0
8
5.5
Wisconsin
0
0
1
0
1
2
5.0
North Carolina
1
2
0
0
0
3
4.6
Oregon
0
0
0
1
0
1
4.0
Virginia
0
1
0
1
0
2
3.6
California
2
2
1
2
2
9
3.4
Massachusetts
0
0
0
0
1
1
2.0
Alaska
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
Connecticut
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
Montana
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
North Dakota
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
Total
39
37
33
36
38
183
8.4
Through May 16th. Notes: Last column indicates the percentage of general election contests since 2002 in which incumbents did not appear on the ballot in that state. Excludes 12 new districts that were created after reapportionment in 2002. Includes districts in which (Democratic) incumbents were drawn into different districts after the Texas redistricting plan of 2003. Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Is Representative Ryan Winkler the DFL's New Attack Dog?
Next post: Retirements from Minnesota State House in 2010 Currently Down from '06 and '08

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting