Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


U.S. Military Service in the U.S. House of Representatives

Bookmark and Share

GOP caucus has 60 percent higher rate of service than Democratic caucus; 17 state delegations have no members with military background

As the nation pauses this Memorial Day weekend to commemorate those members of the U.S. armed forces who died in in military service, there is particular poignancy because America is still involved in wars on two fronts in the Middle East.

With 4,400 military fatalities since 2003 in the war in Iraq and nearly 1,100 since 2001 in Afghanistan, and the cost of each war in the hundreds of billions of dollars, it is particularly important that the perspective of those who have served in the armed forces be represented in Congress.

While the percentage of U.S. Representatives with military experience has declined from past generations, more than 1 in 5 members of the U.S. House are veterans in the 111th Congress (93 of the 432 non-vacant voting districts).

What is the profile of the average Representative who has served in the U.S. military?

That Representative is more likely to be a Republican than a Democrat, and the Republican caucus has an overall 60 percent higher rate of military service than the Democratic caucus.

After Republican Charles Djou (who reached the rank of Captain in the U.S. Army Reserve) won Hawaii's special election for its 1st CD earlier this month, 49 of the 177 GOP seats in the House are held by veterans, or 27.7 percent of its caucus.

By contrast, just 44 of the 255 Democratic seats in the U.S. House are held by veterans, or 17.3 percent of its caucus.

A member of the U.S. House who has served in military also has on average two more full terms under his belt in the House than his colleagues who are not veterans.

U.S. Representatives with military service have served an average of 14.8 years in the lower chamber compared to an average of 10.6 years for those who have not. John Dingell (MI-15), 54.6 years), John Conyers (MI-14, 45.4 years), Bill Young (FL-10, 39.4 years) and Charlie Rangel (NY-15, 39.4 years) lead the way.

A Representative who is a veteran is also more likely to hail from the South compared to the other three regions of the country.

The South has elected a disproportionately higher percentage of candidates with military experience, accounting for nearly half of those with a military background in the entire U.S. House (44 of 93, 47.3 percent).

Overall, 28.8 percent of the 153 Representatives from the 17 southern states have military service, compared to 18.3 percent in the Northeast (15 of 82), 18.2 percent in the Midwest (18 of 99), and 16.5 percent in the West (16 of 97).

Led by Texas, whose 32-member delegation has 10 members with military service, the West South Central division of the country has the highest percentage of veterans in the House, at 27.1 percent (13 of 48).

Representatives from the six states in the New England division (Massachusetts, Connecticut, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont) have the lowest rate of military service with just 2 veterans out of 22 seats, or 9.1 percent (the two being Massachusetts' Ed Markey (MA-07) and Bill Delahunt (MA-10)).

Overall, 17 states currently have U.S. House delegations without any members having served in the U.S. armed forces: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

After Alaska, whose at-large representative Don Young served in the Army from 1955-1957, the states with the highest percentage of members who have served in the military are Kentucky (4 of 6, 66.7 percent) and South Carolina (4 of 6, 66.7 percent).

Two other states, both with two-member delegations, have half of its members with a background in the military - Idaho (Democrat Walt Minnick) and Hawaii (the newly elected GOPer Djou).

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Out with the Old and In with the Older: Ex-Governors Have Historically Good Odds in Comeback Bids
Next post: Veterans in U.S. House Voted 55-37 Against Repeal of Ban on Gays in Military

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting