Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


City Pages Errs in Latest Pawlenty Snark

Bookmark and Share

Tennessee not quite as Republican-friendly as article suggests

In a recent City Pages article published last Friday ("Tim Pawlenty takes not-a-candidate road show to Tennessee"), Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty received a soft jab for delivering a keynote speech in the Volunteer State's GOP 2010 Statesmen's Dinner to be held later that evening.

The Minnesota media has not been shy in taking Pawlenty to task for his aggressive out-of-state travel schedule during the last few years as he ostensibly attempts to build national support for a potential 2012 presidential run.

Such criticism, however, has not stilted Pawlenty's travels, some of which he says are missions geared to drum up business investments to create job opportunities in the Gopher State.

The media frame used by City Pages in this particular piece was to make Pawlenty's appearance seem particularly strategic for this 2012 bid: that he was delivering a keynote address in a state that is a bastion of Republicanism.

But the glue meant to hold this media frame together cannot support the picture City Pages paints.

Reporter Hart Van Denburg writes:

"T-Paw's on the road again to support his I'm-not-saying-if-I'm-running-for-president gambit. Tonight: Tennessee, keynoting the state's GOP 2010 "Statesmen's Dinner." Should be friendly territory. Tennessee hasn't voted for a Democratic U.S. president since Harry S. Truman in 1948." (emphasis added)

There's just one problem.

Tennessee has actually voted for the Democratic presidential candidate several times since Harry Truman in 1948.

· In 1964, Lyndon Johnson defeated Barry Goldwater in Tennessee by 11 points, 55.5 to 44.5 percent.

· In 1976, Jimmy Carter, a fellow Southern neighbor from Georgia, defeated Gerald Ford by 13 points, 55.9 to 42.9 percent.

· In 1992, Bill Clinton, from neighboring Arkansas, defeated George H.W. Bush by 4.7 points, 47.1 to 42.4 percent.

· In 1996, Tennessee voters helped to reelect the Clinton/Al Gore ticket with a 2.4-point victory over Bob Dole, 48.0 to 45.6 percent.

Of course, Tennessee is viewed to have taken a bit of a turn to the right in recent years, such as when Democrat Al Gore failed to carry his home state in the 2000 presidential election - a state which had elected him to the U.S. Senate in both 1984 and 1990 (and as Vice-President in 1992 and 1996).

Gore lost that contest by 3.9 points to George W. Bush - 51.2 to 47.3 percent.

But the 2000 contest was not the only election in which the Democratic presidential candidate only narrowly lost the Volunteer State since 1948:

· In 1952, Dwight Eisenhower defeated Adlai Stevenson by just 0.3 points - 50.0 to 49.7 percent.

· In the 1956 rematch, Eisenhower escaped with a 0.6-point victory, 49.2 to 48.6 percent.

· In 1980, Ronald Reagan nipped Jimmy Carter by only 0.3 points, 48.7 to 48.4 percent.

In state politics, Democrats also frequently rule the day in Tennessee, winning 11 out of 16 gubernatorial elections since 1948, including Phil Bresden in 2002 and 2006 (by 38.9 points).

Tennessee is certainly trending Republican (e.g. Barack Obama's 15.1-point loss to John McCain in 2008; Republican takeovers of the state senate and state house in the 2000s).

However, the Volunteer State is one good Democratic candidate away from being a battleground state again in federal elections, as evidenced by Harold Ford's 2.7-point defeat to Bob Corker in the state's 2006 U.S. Senate race.

The truth is, no U.S. State has voted straight-Republican since the 1948 presidential election.

City Pages attempted to cast Tennessee in a role much more well-suited for states such as Alaska, Idaho, Kansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Utah, or Wyoming - nine states which have only voted for a Democratic presidential nominee one time since 1948 (all in 1964).

Tennessee, a southern state that still maintains a sizable Democratic Party presence, does not quite pass this audition.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Which States Produce the Most Governors?
Next post: Should Kagan's Partisan Past and Policy Work Derail Her Confirmation?

1 Comment


  • I wonder if this is a case of CityPages overreaching, or a case of poor fact-checking by their editors. Of course, had the article been fact-checked, the narrative they ran with would have fallen apart.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting