Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Face Time: DFL Gubernatorial Candidate Communication Strategies in TV Ads

Bookmark and Share

Anderson Kelliher delivers more face time in ads than other candidates; Dayton utilizes more voice-over artists and does not deliver a single message speaking directly into the camera

This is the first in a series of Smart Politics reports on campaign advertising in the 2010 Minnesota gubernatorial election.

More than a dozen television ads have been released through mid-July by the leading trio of DFL candidates, and while there has been some consistency in the content of their messages, there have been decidedly different communication strategies in their delivery.

A Smart Politics content analysis of six ads run by former State Representative Matt Entenza, five ads by former U.S. Senator Mark Dayton, and two ads by House Speaker and DFL-endorsed Margaret Anderson Kelliher finds that Anderson Kelliher has personally narrated a larger percentage of her ads than her rivals as well as delivered the largest percentage of on-camera face time.

In her two 30 second ads to date, the DFL endorsee delivers her campaign messages in her own voice for a total of 47 seconds, or 78.3 percent of the ads.

By contrast, Entenza voices 90 seconds of the three minutes in his six ads (50.0 percent), while Dayton speaks for just 37 seconds of the three minutes in his five ads (20.6 percent).

For example, in her debut ad "Minnesota Story," Anderson Kelliher narrates over the entire 30 second spot - giving a brief account of her family's back story in the Gopher State.

In her second ad, "Serve," she voices 17 seconds as bookends of the 30 second spot which utilizes actors in between in a comedic attack on Governor Tim Pawlenty's alleged political ambitions and his administration's history of serving corporate special interests.

Matt Entenza, meanwhile, has taken a middle ground in his campaign advertising, alternating ads with his own personal voice with those of a voice-over artist.

In the former Representative's first two ads ("Vision" and "Me") Entenza narrates each of the 30 second spots in their entirety.

In two of his most recent ads ("New Direction" and "Clean Up") the narration on education and energy policy is conducted entirely by a voice-over artist.

In his two other ads ("Plan" and "Disappearing") Entenza personally voices 16 and 14 seconds of the two 30 second spots respectively, alternating commentary with his running mate Robyne Robinson in the former and a voice-over artist in the latter.

Perhaps because he is the most well-known DFLer in next month's primary, with a surname that has a long history in the Gopher State, Mark Dayton does not personally narrate a single frame in three of his five campaign ads: "9,000 miles" (a 60-second personal narrative), "Forged" (on education), and "So Much" (on seniors).

In his two other spots ("Fair Share" and "A Government as Good as Our People"), Dayton speaks for 18 and 19 seconds respectively on tax increases for the wealthiest of Minnesotans.

However, even when candidates narrated their own ads there was a distinct difference in how they spoke to their audience.

Smart Politics examined how much screen time each DFLer devoted to speaking on-camera, looking Minnesotans in the eye whilst delivering their campaign messages.

Margaret Anderson Kelliher utilized more than a quarter of her time in the ads speaking directly to Minnesotans, with Entenza doing so for just a shade over one-seventh of his spots, and Dayton not spending a single second looking and speaking directly into the camera.

For the 16 seconds the House Speaker appears talking on-screen in her ads, every moment is spent delivering her lines while looking directly into the camera, talking about how to "put Minnesota back to work" ("Minnesota Story") and how she took on Governor Pawlenty to "fix our bridges and stop cuts to health care and schools" ("Serve").

Entenza spends 27 seconds of his three minutes of television advertising speaking directly to the viewers (15.0 percent). In his first two ads, the former Representative introduces himself by name and talks for 16 seconds collectively about the need to "make Minnesota great again" (in "Vision" and "Me").

In his ad on education ("Plan") Entenza (with his running mate Robyne Robinson) speaks directly into the camera for 11 seconds about how his achievements came from Minnesota teachers who pushed him and concludes with a variation of his campaign tagline, "Making Minnesota great again starts right here."

Mark Dayton, meanwhile, does not spend even one frame of his 180 seconds in his five television ads speaking eye-to-eye with the television audience.

The only ads in which Dayton speaks on camera at all revolve around his promise to "close tax loopholes" and "make the rich pay their fair share of taxes" to raise revenue to help pay for programs like education.

However, those statements are presented with the former Senator looking away from the camera lens in on-screen 'discussions' with ordinary Minnesotans - around a table with townsfolk ("Fair Share") and out in the countryside ("A Government as Good as Our People").

Dayton never looks directly into the camera to tell voters he will raise taxes on a segment of the population.

Perhaps because Entenza and Anderson Kelliher are not quite the fixtures in Minnesota politics as Dayton, they feel a greater need to introduce themselves to voters by incorporating more of themselves into their ads than does Dayton.

A follow-up report on the content of DFL campaign advertising will be posted later this week.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Redistricting Historically Fails to Make Minnesota U.S. Representatives Vulnerable
Next post: Is Tim Pawlenty Running for a 3rd Term?

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

No Free Passes: States With 2 Major Party Candidates in Every US House Race

Indiana has now placed candidates from both major parties on the ballot in a nation-best 189 consecutive U.S. House races, with New Hampshire, Minnesota, Idaho, and Montana also north of 100 in a row.

Political Crumbs

Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


An Idaho Six Pack

Two-term Idaho Republican Governor Butch Otter only polled at 39 percent in a recent PPP survey of the state's 2014 race - just four points ahead of Democratic businessman A.J. Balukoff. Otter's low numbers reflect his own struggles as a candidate (witness his weak primary win against State Senator Russ Fulcher) combined with the opportunity for disgruntled Idahoans to cast their votes for one of four third party and independent candidates, who collectively received the support of 12 percent of likely voters: Libertarian John Bujak, the Constitution Party's Steve Pankey, and independents Jill Humble and Pro-Life (aka Marvin Richardson). The six candidate options in a gubernatorial race sets an all-time record in the Gem State across the 46 elections conducted since statehood. The previous high water mark of five candidates was reached in seven previous cycles: 1902, 1904, 1908, 1912, 1914, 1966, and 2010.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting