Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


The Great Divide: Birth States of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

Bookmark and Share

Only 11 of 111 justices have been born in the 24 states west of the Mississippi River; just 25 percent over the last 50 years

When Elena Kagan was nominated to the Supreme Court by Barack Obama earlier this year, it was observed by many journalists that - should she be confirmed - every current member of the Court would have received their law degree from either Harvard (John Roberts, Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Kagan) or Yale (Sonia Sotomayor, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas).

But Kagan's confirmation would continue another trend that has persisted throughout the 19th and 20th Centuries and into the 2000s - a trend related to the geographic origin of the justices.

Kagan is a New Yorker, and would mark the fourth of the last six justices who were born in the Empire State (Sotomayor, Ginsburg, and Roberts).

Taking a wider view, Kagan would join six other justices born east of the Mississippi River: her fellow New Yorkers plus Alito (New Jersey), Scalia (New Jersey), and Thomas (Georgia). Only Breyer and Kennedy were born west of the river (both in California).

All told, a Smart Politics analysis finds only 11 of the 111 justices who have served on the Court were born in the 24 states west of the Mississippi River, with 94 justices born in the eastern half of the country and 6 born in foreign nations.

There is one obvious factor that explains why the the Court would be naturally tilted towards easterners across history, at least through the first few generations of the country - statehood was generally achieved from east to west across the nation over time.

As such, a majority of the nation's population has always resided on the east side of the river (although most of the fastest growing states are currently out west).

But this does not completely account for the ongoing imbalance in the geographic origins of the justices today.

The 2008 U.S. Census population estimates find that the 26 states east of the Mississippi comprise approximately 59 percent of the nation's population, with the 24 states to the west totaling approximately 41 percent.

And what states have given birth to the most justices over the past 221 years?

New York leads the way, with 13, including luminaries such as Benjamin Cardozo (pictured) and John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the Court.

The string of three New Yorkers to reach the bench (with Kagan pending) over the past generation ends a bit of a drought for the Empire State.

Prior to Ruth Bader Ginsburg's confirmation in 1933, it had been 61 years since a native New Yorker was confirmed to the bench (Cardozo, in 1932).

In second place is the Commonwealth of Virginia, which has given birth to 10 justices, although nine of these were among the first 35 confirmed to the bench (including Chief Justice John Marshall).

Since Noah Swayne's confirmation in 1862, only one of the last 76 justices has been a Virginian (Lewis Powell, the 99th Justice, confirmed in 1971).

Other states generating a fair number of justices include Massachusetts (with 9), Kentucky (8), Pennsylvania (6), Maryland (6), Ohio (5), New Jersey (5), Connecticut (5), Georgia (5), Illinois (4), and New Hampshire (4).

The only states west of the Mississippi that crack the Top 15 are California and Minnesota, with three justices each (tied for #13).

The first justice born west of the river was Edward White, the Court's 55th justice, who was born in Lafourche, Louisiana in 1845 and confirmed in March 1894.

But it would be another 26 years and 16 justices before the next such nominee came from a state across this great divide (the Court's 71st Justice, Pierce Butler, from Minnesota in 1922).

It would then be another 17 years and 8 justices before the third such nominee ascended to the bench - William Douglas, also born in Minnesota, confirmed in April 1939.

Even since the end of World War II, 20 of the 28 justices confirmed to the court were born in states east of the Mississippi, or 71.4 percent.

In addition to Californians Kennedy and Breyer, the list includes Sandra Day O'Connor (Texas), Warren Burger (Minnesota), Byron White (Colorado), Charles Whittaker (Kansas), Earl Warren (California), and Tom Campbell Clark (Texas).

And the trend is not waning.

If Kagan is confirmed, 15 of the last 19 justices will have been born in states east of the Mississippi (79 percent).

Of course, given the increased mobility of modern society, if there is a geographical bias in play today, it may not be so much in what state one is born but rather in what state one lives when one makes his or her professional mark.

A Smart Politics analysis of where justices first settled into their careers after their education finds the numbers are still heavily tilted towards the eastern half of the country.

In total, 92 justices made their professional mark east of the Mississippi, or 83 percent, compared to just 19 in the western half of the country.

New York again tops the list, with 14 justices spending a significant portion of their professional development in the Empire State.

Non-native New Yorkers who came to the Empire State include Austrian-born Felix Frankfurter (Justice #78, pictured) and Illinois-born John Harlan (Justice #89), both of whom became Assistant United States Attorneys for the Southern District of New York.

Ohio has been the next most common state in which future jurists have developed professionally with 11 justices, the most recent being Michigan-born Potter Stewart (confirmed in 1959).

Ohio was followed by Massachusetts (8), Virginia (6), Pennsylvania (6), New Jersey (6), Kentucky (5), Maryland (5), and Tennessee (5).

California (4) and Minnesota (3) are again the only states west of the Mississippi to land just outside the Top 10.

Overall, 24 states have not given birth to a Supreme Court justice to date including Delaware, Rhode Island, and Vermont - each of which achieved statehood in the 1700s.

Birth States of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

Rank
State
#
Percent
1
New York
13
11.7
2
Virginia
10
9.0
3
Massachusetts
9
8.1
4
Kentucky
8
7.2
5
Maryland
6
5.4
5
Pennsylvania
6
5.4
7
Connecticut
5
4.5
7
Georgia
5
4.5
7
New Jersey
5
4.5
7
Ohio
5
4.5
11
Illinois
4
3.6
11
New Hampshire
4
3.6
13
California
3
2.7
13
Minnesota
3
2.7
13
South Carolina
3
2.7
13
Tennessee
3
2.7
17
Indiana
2
1.8
17
Michigan
2
1.8
17
Texas
2
1.8
20
Alabama
1
0.9
20
Colorado
1
0.9
20
Kansas
1
0.9
20
Louisiana
1
0.9
20
Maine
1
0.9
20
North Carolina
1
0.9
20
Wisconsin
1
0.9
---
Alaska
0
0.0
---
Arizona
0
0.0
---
Arkansas
0
0.0
---
Delaware
0
0.0
---
Florida
0
0.0
---
Hawaii
0
0.0
---
Idaho
0
0.0
---
Iowa
0
0.0
---
Mississippi
0
0.0
---
Missouri
0
0.0
---
Montana
0
0.0
---
Nebraska
0
0.0
---
Nevada
0
0.0
---
New Mexico
0
0.0
---
North Dakota
0
0.0
---
Oklahoma
0
0.0
---
Oregon
0
0.0
---
Rhode Island
0
0.0
---
South Dakota
0
0.0
---
Utah
0
0.0
---
Vermont
0
0.0
---
Washington
0
0.0
---
West Virginia
0
0.0
---
Wyoming
0
0.0
 
Foreign nations
6
5.4
 
Total
111
100.0
Table compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Breeding Brilliant Legal Minds: Minnesotans on the U.S. Supreme Court
Next post: Independence Day in the United States and Beyond

1 Comment


  • There is the fact, mentioned in the article, that for the first half or so of the nation's existence, there weren't many people west of the Mississippi. In addition, those that did live there by and large weren't too interested in the type of education that would lead to becoming a Supreme Court justice. This tradition is with us today as is abundantly exemplified by the Texas State Board of Education, by the candidacy of Sarah Palin, and by the preponderance of teabaggers found west of the Mississippi. It just isn't a place that you are likely to find many people qualified to be on the bench (except park benches) let alone the SC bench.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting